Juries and Justices of the Peace in the United States of America

• Autorzy: Paweł Króliczek

Warianty tytułu

Ławy przysięgłych i sędziowie pokoju w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Praca ukazuje amerykański model uczestnictwa społeczeństwa w sprawowaniu wymiaru sprawiedliwości. Jest on istotny dla polskiej dyskusji o zaangażowaniu w tej materii czynnika publicznego. Analizę podzielono między konstytucyjnym prawem do procesu przed ławą przysięgłych a instytucją sędziów pokoju, która jest unikatowa dla anglosaskiego systemu prawnego. Przeprowadzone tutaj badanie jest wynikiem szczegółowej analizy kazuistyki Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych oraz wybranych sądów stanowych, która ukształtowała poglądy amerykańskich badaczy na tę kwestię. Miejmy nadzieję, że niniejsze studium wspomoże reformę procesu sądowego w Polsce.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The paper shows an American model of the participation of the society in the administration of justice. It is crucial for the Polish discussion about the involvement of public factor in that manner. The analysis is divided between the constitutional right to trial by jury and the institution of justices of the peace, which is unique for the Anglo-Saxon legal system. Research conducted here is the result of a detailed analysis of the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States and selected state courts that shaped the views of the American academia on this issue. Hopefully, this brief study will help to reform the Polish judicial process.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Sądownictwo; Sądy międzynarodowe; Sprawiedliwość; Sprawiedliwość społeczna; Wymiar sprawiedliwości

EN

Judicature; International courts; Justice; Social justice; Judiciary

• Czasopismo: Krytyka Prawa
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: T. 12, Nr 4
• Strony: 87-104

Twórcy

autor

Paweł Króliczek

• Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Bibliografia

• Amar A.R., Reinventing Juries: Ten Suggested Reforms, "University of California DavisLaw Review" 1995, 28.
• An Analysis of Alternative Constructions of the Requirement That Federal Jurors Be CompetentUnder State Law, "Yale Law Journal" 1954-1955, 64.
• Barnett J.D., Courts: Justice of the Peace Courts (Recommendations), "Oregon Law Review"1942, 21.
• Carrington P.D., Trial by Jury, [in:] L.W. Levy, K.L. Karst (eds.), Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, Vol. 6, New York 2000.
• Chapman N.S., McConnell M.W., Due Process as Separation of Powers, "Yale Law Journal"2012, 121.
• Clark J., Boccaccini M.T., Caillouet B., Chaplin W.F., Five Factor Model Personality Traits,Jury Selection, and Case Outcomes in Criminal and Civil Cases, "Criminal Justice andBehavior" 2007, 34.
• Davis C.J., Elkins E.R., Kidd P.E., The Justice of the Peace in West Virginia, Morgantown,WV 1958.
• Diamond S.S., Rose M.R., Murphy B., Revisiting the Unanimity Requirement: The Behaviorof the Non-Unanimous Civil Jury, "Northwestern University Law Review" 2006, 100.
• Dolan R.J., Fenton W.B., The Justice of the Peace in Nebraska, "Nebraska Law Review" 1969, 48.
• Ewing A. Jr., Justice of the Peace: Bedrock of the Democracy, "Tennessee Law Review" 1950, 21.
• Farmer M.C., Jury Composition Challenges, "Law & Psychology Review" 1976, 2.
• Fassett J.D., New Deal Justice: The Life of Stanley Reed of Kentucky, New York 1994.
• Furr W.R., Justice of the Peace in Virginia: A Neglected Aspect of the Judiciary, "Virginia LawReview" 1966, 52.
• Gardner M.R., Punitive Juvenile Justice and Public Trials by Jury: Sixth Amendment Applicationsin a Post-McKeiver World, "Nebraska Law Review" 2012-2013, 91.
• Heller F.H., The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: A Study in ConstitutionalDevelopment, Lawrence 1951.
• Keebler R.S., Our Justice of the Peace Courts: A Problem in Justice, "Tennessee Law Review"1930, 9.
• Kershen D.L., Vicinage, "Oklahoma Law Review" 1976, 29.
• Ketcham O.W., McKeiver v. Pennsylvania: The Last Word on Juvenile Adjudications?, "CornellLaw Review" 1971-1972, 57.
• Landsman S., Appellate Courts and Civil Juries, "University of Cincinnati Law Review"2002, 70.
• Lerner Lettow R., The Failure of Originalism in Preserving Constitutional Rights to Civil JuryTrial, "William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal" 2014, 22.
• Levy L.W., The Medieval Origins of Trial by Jury, [in:] Winters R. (ed.), The Right to a Trialby Jury, Greenhaven 2005.
• McNeil N.H., Schmid A.C., Constitutionality of the Fee System in Justice of the Peace Courts,"Notre Dame Lawyer" 1954, 29.
• McKenna W.J., Justice in the Minor Courts, "Temple Law Quarterly" 1952, 25.
• McVicker J.R., The Seventeenth Century Justice of Peace in England, "Kentucky Law Journal"24 (1935-1936).
• Miller D.A.H., Text, History, and Tradition: What the Seventh Amendment Can Teach Us Aboutthe Second, "Yale Law Journal" 2012-2013, 122.
• Miller R.H., Six of One Is Not a Dozen of the Other: A Reexamination of Williams v. Florida andthe Size of State Criminal Juries, "University of Pennsylvania Law Review" 1997-1998, 146.
• Murfree W.L., The Justice of the Peace: A Compendium of the Law Relating to Justices of thePeace - Their Powers and Duties - The Procedures in Justices' Courts, With Forms of Processand Entries Used Therein, Saint Louis, MO 1886.
• Murray P.L., The Disappearing Massachusetts Civil Jury Trial, "Massachusetts Law Review"2004, 89.
• O'Connor S.D., Trends in the Relationship Between Federal And Stated Court in the Perspectiveof a State Court Judge, "William and Mary Law Review" 1981, 22(4).
• Orfield L.B., Trial by Jury in Federal Criminal Procedure, "Duke Law Journal" 1962, 29.
• Partain G.L., The Justice of the Peace: Constitutional Questions, "West Virginia Law Review"1967, 69.
• Pollock F., Maitland F., The History of English Law Before Time of Edward I, Vol. I (2nd ed.),Cambridge 1895.
• Potter L.F. Jr., Jury Trial of Crimes, "Washington and Lee Law Review" 1966, 23.
• Roots R., The Rise and Fall of the American Jury, "Seton Hall Circuit Review" 2011, 8.
• Schaffner J.E., The Seventh Amendment Right to Civil Jury Trial: The Supreme Court Givethand the Supreme Court Taketh Away, "Baltimore Law Review" 2002, 31.
• Schultz M.S., The Jury Redefined: A Review of Burger Court Decisions, "Law and ContemporaryProblems" 1980, 43.
• Shelfer L.F., Special Juries in the Supreme Court, "Yale Law Journal" 2016, 123.
• Sherr G., Brinton J., Business and Jury Trial: The Framers' Vision Versus Modern Reality,"Ohio State Law Journal" 2010, 70.
• Siegel S.A., The Constitution on Trial: Article III's Jury Trial Provision, Originalism, and theProblem of Motivated Reasoning, "Santa Clara Law Review" 2012, 52.
• Sixth Amendment: Right to a Jury Trial, "Supreme Court Review" 1979.
• Smith A., Saks M.J., The Case of Overturning Williams v. Florida and the Six-Person Jury:History, Law, and Empirical Evidence, "Florida Law Review" 2008, 60.
• Smith Ch.H., The Justice of the Peace in the United States, "California Law Review" 1927, 15(2).
• Smith D.G., The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform, "Hofstra Law Review"1996, 25.
• Sperlich P.W., Trial by Jury: It May Have a Future, "Supreme Court Review" 1978.
• Spooner L., An Essay on the Trial by Jury, Boston 1852.
• The Justice of the Peace (notes), "North Carolina Law Review" 1904, 1(4).
• Thomas S.A., Blackstone's Curse: The Fall of the Criminal, Civil, and Grand Juries and the Riseof the Vanlandingham K.E., The Decline of the Justice of the Peace, "University of Kansas LawReview" 1964, 12.
• Wolfram Ch.W., The Constitutional History of the Seventh Amendment, "Minnesota LawReview" 1963, 57.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7206/kp.2080-1084.411