Sustainable Packaging in Footwear Industry: Case Study of PUMA

• Autorzy: Lucie Sara Zavodna , Lucie Trejtnarova
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Modern companies are more focused on the life cycle of their products, so it comes also with sustainable packaging of products. Some companies do this on their own initiative, others because of customer's pressure. There are already several experiments, where companies introduced packaging that can be disposed of in an environmentally friendly way or reused. The main goal of the paper is to describe case study of sustainable packaging in the footwear industry. Main findings and implications. Even big producers of shoes are facing troubles with sustainable packaging solutions. The case study shows why PUMA abandoned the new sustainable packaging of shoes. After trying sustainable packaging, PUMA returned to the classic cardboard box in 2015. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Przemysł obuwniczy; Produkcja opakowań; Innowacje w opakowalnictwie; Opakowania ekologiczne; Rozwój zrównoważony; Ochrona środowiska

EN

Shoe industry; Production of packaging; Innovations in packaging; Ecological wrapping; Sustainable development; Environmental protection

• Czasopismo: Economics, Management and Sustainability
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 6
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 27-33

Twórcy

autor

Lucie Sara Zavodna

• College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic

autor

Lucie Trejtnarova

• Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
• Bramklev, C. (2009). On a proposal for a generic package development process. Packaging Technology and Science, 22(3), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.850
• Fuseproject. (2020, December 10). https://www.fuseproject.com/work/puma-clever-little-bag
• Garcia-Arca, J. & Prado-Prado (2008). Packaging design model from supply chain approach. Supply Chain Management, 13(5), 375-380.
• Graphic Information Design Blog. (2010). Sustainable Futures Exhibition: Design Museum. http://gdes2012tutor.blogspot.com/2010/04/sustainable-futures-exhibition-design.html
• Jonson, G. (2000). Packaging Technology for the Logistician. Lund University, Lund.
• Knobloch, K., Yoon, U., & Vogt, P. M. (2011). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 39(2), 91-92.
• Liu, Y. X., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Study on universal packaging design and its environmental utility based on the theory of "Make the Best Use of Everything". Packaging Engineering, 16 (003).
• Magnier, L., Schoormans, J.P.L., & Mugge, R. (2016). Judging a product by its cover: Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products. Food Quality and Preference, 53, 132-142.
• McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2013). The upcycle: Beyond sustainability, designing for abundance. New York: North Point Press.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
• Novak, B. (2016). UNIT 9 - Sustainable packaging for footwear. https://www.step2sustainability.eu/docs/Unit9.pdf
• PE Americas. (2010). Life Cycle Assessment of different shoe packaging design for PUMA.
• PUMA Sustainability Report 2012. (2020, December 12). https://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/reporting
• PUMA Sustainability Report 2014. (2020, December 14). https://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/reporting
• PUMA. (2010). Puma's new packaging and distribution system to save more than 60% of paper and water annually. https://about.puma.com/en/newsroom/corporate-news/2010/04-13-2010-pumas-new-packaging-and-distribution-system
• Robertson, G. L. (2012). Food packaging: Principles and practice (3rd ed.): CRC press.
• Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices-do consumers care?. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516-525.
• Siegle, L. (2010). Recycle: The essential guide. London: Black Dog.
• Sustainable Packaging Coalition. (2011). Definition of sustainable packaging. Virginia: GreenBlue.
• Sutanto, S.M. (2018). Clever Little Bag"Green Packaging Inovation from Puma. Visual Communication Design Journal, 3(1), 1-12.
• The Consumer Goods Forum. (2010). A Global Language for Packaging and Sustainability. Paris.
• The Economist (2007, 07.06.). The truth about recycling, 383, 24.
• Triads (2020, December 5). https://www.triads.co.uk/triads-mens-c1/footwear-c24/trainers-c211/puma-r698-green-box-pack-trainers-amazon-green-p70505
• Viupax (2020, December 1). http://viupax.com/sustainable-packaging/eco-friendly-shoe-box/
• Wang, L., & Yang, M. (2008). Green Packaging Design on the Principle of 3R. Packaging Engineering, 2(058).
• Welbel, J. (2011). Puma's "Clever Little Bag". Packaging strategies. https://www.packagingstrategies.com/articles/92042-puma-s-clever-little-bag
• Williams, H., Wikstrom, F. & Lofgren, M. (2008). A life cycle perspective on environmental effects of customer focused packaging development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7, 853-859.
• Winston, A. (2018). Puma and MIT Design Lab envision a future of self-adapting, performance-enhancing sportswear. Dezeen. https://www.dezeen.com/2018/05/24/mit-media-lab-puma-future-sportswear-design/
• Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green packaging management of logistics enterprises. Physics Procedia, 24, 900-905.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/jems.2021.6-1.2