Innovative Development of Countries in the Context of Global Economic Imbalances

• Autorzy: Mariia Shkurat , Alisa Temerbek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper emphasises the fact that innovation is a driver for development and a leading factor in economic growth and ensuring a high level of competitiveness. The impetus for further development is given to those countries that already have a sufficient innovation level of the economy. The aim of the research is to determine the role of innovative development of a country in its economic development and competitiveness of the national economy. The world's leading countries now face the challenge of building a competitive economy, so the dynamics of positioning countries in the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) and Global Innovation Index (GII) has been provided and the view that innovation plays an important role in the country's development and the formation of its competitiveness confirmed. The authors have distinguished groups of countries by systematising the places they occupy. Furthermore, they have identified features of innovation strategies of the countries in the proposed groups. The paper also suggests integrated assessment of innovation and economic deve-lopment of countries, which allows to determine their level, trace the dynamics and determine the relationship between innovation and economic development for every country. Additionally, the study has shown a relationship between the level of innovation and economic development for all countries under analysis. However, there is a difference in the degree of this relationship, which is higher for developing countries. Thus, it is expedient for these countries to pursue an active innovation policy to increase the level of economic development. Despite the fact that developed countries have more opportunities for active development of the innovative component in the national economy, their indicators in innovation and high-tech industries are declining and developing countries come to the fore. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Innowacje; Rozwój gospodarczy; Rozwój technologiczny; Nierównowaga konkurencyjna

EN

Innovations; Economic development; Technological development; Competitive imbalance

• Czasopismo: Research Papers in Economics and Finance
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 49-60

Twórcy

autor

Mariia Shkurat

• Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University, Vinnytsia, Ukrai

autor

Alisa Temerbek

• Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University, Vinnytsia, Ukrai

Bibliografia

• Baltserovych, L. (2000). Svoboda i rozvytok. Ekonomiia vilnoho rynku [Freedom and development. Free mar-ket economy]. Lviv : [b.v.], 332 (in Ukrainian).
• Bazhal I. (2019). Innovations as a Crucial Factor of the Catch-up Economic Growth. Scientific papers NAUK-MA. Economics. 4(1), 3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18523/2519-4739.20194.1.3-8.
• Bransky V. (1999). Sotsialna synerhetyka yak postmodernistska filosofiia istorii [Social synergetics as a postmodern philosophy of history]. Social sciences and modernity. 6, 117-127. URL: http://www.ecsoc-man.hse.ru/ons/msg/18427220.html (In Russian).
• Dutta S. (2007) World business: The power of innovation. INSEAD. URL: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/gii-2007-report.pdf.
• Dutta S., Lanvin B. (2020). The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation. Cornell Univer-sity, INSEAD, WIPO. URL: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2020-report.
• Dutta S., Lanvin B. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO. URL: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2018-report.
• Dyer-Witheford, Nick (2015). Cyber-Proletariat. Global Labour in the Digital Vortex, London: Pluto Press.
• Fedak M. (2018). Ohliad stratehii po 4.0 krain YeS vid Yevrokomisii [Review of strategies for 4.0 EU countries by the European Commission] URL: https://industry4-0-ukraine.com.ua/2018/08/27/review-national-strategies-4-0-in-eu/.
• Filipenko, A. (2002). Jekonomicheskoe razvitie: civilizacionnyj podhod [Economic development: a civilization-al approach]. Moscow: Jekonomika. p. 260 (in Russian).
• Frey C., Osborne M. (2016)Technology at work v 2.0 Oxford Martin School. University of Oxford. URL: https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/Citi_GPS_Technology_Work_2.pdf.
• Kuznetsova, N. P. (1996). Economic growth in a historical context. St. Petersburg, p. 106 (in Russian).
• Lukianenko D. H., Poruchnyk A. M., Kolot A. M., Stoliarchuk Ya. M. (2011) Resursy ta modeli hlobalnoho eko-nomichnoho rozvytku [Resources and models of global economic development]. K.: KNEU (in Ukrainian).
• Mulyavka V. (2016). Novi tekhnolohii i hlobalna nerivnist [New technologies and global inequality]. Spilne[Joint]. URL: https://commons.com.ua/uk/novi-tehnologiyi-i-globalna-nerivnist/.
• Nureev, R. M. (2018). Digital technologies: main directions of development. The Business and Management Review, 9(4), 523-533.
• OECD (2020). Research and Development Statistics. URL: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/resear-chanddevelopmentstatisticsrds.htm.
• Porter M., Cornelius P. (2000). The Global Competitiveness Report 1999. World Economic Forum. URL: http://web.mit.edu/15.018/attach/Global Competitiveness Report 2000, part 1.pdf.
• Porter M., Schwab K. (2009). The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009. World Economic Forum. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2008-09.pdf.
• Schumpeter, J. (1934). Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Schwab K. (2019) The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf.
• Shavans, B. (1999). Evolyutsionnyiy put ot sotsializma [An evolutionary path from socialism. Voprosyi ekono-miki]. Vol. 6, URL: http://www.r-reforms.ru/shavans.htm (in Russian).
• Shiryaev Yu. S. (1990). SEV: nauka - proizvodstvo - sotrudnichestvo. Puti k tekhnologicheskomu sotrudnich-estvu (tendentsii 80-kh godov) [CMEA: science - production - cooperation. Ways to technological coopera-tion (trends of the 80s)]. M.: Nauka, 1990. - p. 143. (in Russian).
• Stoliarchuk, Ya. M. (2009). Asymetriia hlobalnoho rozvytku: sotsialno-ekonomichnyi vymir [Asymmetry of global development: socio-economic dimension]. Kyiv; p. 34.
• Stoliarchuk, Ya. M. (2009). Hlobalni asymetrii ekonomichnoho rozvytku. [Global asymmetries of economic development]. Kyiv: KNEU; p. 302 (in Ukrainian).
• Syhyda L.O. (2018). Industriia 4.0 ta yii vplyv na krainy svitu [Industry 4.0 and its impact on countries around the world]. Economy and society, 17, 58-64 (in Ukrainian).
• World Bank Group (2016). World Development Report: Digital Dividends URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016.
• World Bank Group (2020). World development indicators. URL: (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/data-set/world-development-indicators).
• Zapukhliak V. Z., Herman L. T. (2014). Asymetrii hlobalnoho ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Asymmetries of global economic development]. Ekonomichnyi analiz [Economic analysis].Ternopil': Vydavnycho-polihra-fichnyi tsentr Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu «Ekonomichna dumka», 18(3), 16-25 (in Ukrainian).
• Zhylinska O., Chernyak O., Bazhenova O. (2019). The Role Of Innovations In Driving Economic Growth: Case Of Advanced Economies, Globalization And Business, 7, 11-15. https://doi.org/10.35945/gb.2019.07.001.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18559/ref.2020.4.5