The Use of the Risk Management Procedure in Hi Tech Project Management

• Autorzy: Israel Michael Nachzac
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

To start doing anything a man should have an impulse. The author's motivation to investigate the issue of "Risk Manage-ment Procedure in Hi Tech Project Management" derives from the commercial world of managing hi-tech projects. Such an impulse in the entrepreneurial world is called an entrepreneurial intention (B. Bird 1988). The 21st century techno-logy is characterised by development and implementation of sophisticated products, which are subjected to various risks and incredible market competitiveness. The management of conventional and traditional projects has objective difficulties to cover all management components dictated by risks and the competitive market. The paper's aim is to deal with the question of "whether risk factors receive enough attention by management?" and recommend expanding the awareness among all the management and use risk management which will help with improving the ability to cope with the manage-ment difficulties.Based on the author questionnaire results it was found that risk management should be part of project management, which fully meets the PMs' expectations and has been found to meet the hypothesis assumptions.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarządzanie; Zarządzanie ryzykiem; Metoda PMI (Project Management Institute); Metodyka prowadzenia projektu; Zarządzanie projektem

EN

Management; Risk management; Project Management Institute method; Methodology of the project management; Project management

• Czasopismo: Research Papers in Economics and Finance
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 31-38

Twórcy

autor

Israel Michael Nachzac

• Poznan University of Economics and Business

Bibliografia

• Association for Project Management, 2004. Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide (PRAM), APM Pub-lishing.
• Association for Project Management, 2006. APM Body of Knowledge, 5th edition, APM Publishing.
• Baccarini, D., Salm, G., Love, P.E.D., 2004. Management of risk in information technology projects. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 104(4), 286-295.
• Bannerman, P.L., 2008. Risk and Risk Management in Software Projects: A reassessment. The Journal of Sys-tems and Software, 81, 2118-2133.
• Bernoulli D., 1954, Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22(1), 23-36.
• Besner, C. and Hobbs, B., 2006. The Perceived Value and Potential Contribution of Project Management Prac-tices to Project Success. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 37-48.
• Bird, B., 1988. Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case of Intention, Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
• Chapman C.B., Cooper D.F., 1983. Parametric discounting. Omega, 11(3), 303-310.
• Del Caño Gochi, A., Pilar de la Cruz, M., 2002. Integrated Methodology for Project Risk Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(6), 473-485.
• Dvir, D., Sadeh, A., Malach-Pines, A., 2006. Projects and Project Managers: The Relationship between Project Managers' Personality, Project Types, and Project Success. Project Management Journal, 37(5), 36-48.
• Gemmer, A., 1997, Risk Management; Moving Beyond Process. Computer, 30(5), 33-43.
• Hillson, D., Simon, P. 2007, Practical Project Risk Management: The ATOM Methodology. Management Con-cepts Inc.
• ISO 31000, 2018, Risk Management Standard.
• ISO 9001, 2015, Risk Management Standard.
• Kutsch, E., Hall, M., 2005. Intervening conditions on the management of project risk: Dealing with uncertain-ty in information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management 23(8). 591-599.
• Mowbray A.M., Blanchard R.H., Williams C.A., 1979. View on the Concepts of Uncertainty and Risk, Insurance. Krieger Publishing Co.
• PMBOK® Guide - Fifth Edition, 2013. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Newtown Square, PA.
• Project Management Institute, 2008. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK®), New-town Square, PA.
• Raz, T., Shenhar and Aharon, Dvir, D., 2002. Risk management, project success, and technological uncertain-ty. R&D Management, 32(2), 101-109.
• Ropponen J., Lyytinen K., 1997. Can software risk management improve system development: an explorato-ry study, European Journal of Information, 6, 41-50.
• Tesch, D., Kloppenborg, T.J., Frolick, M.N., 2007. IT Project Risk Factors: The Project Management Profession-als Perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(4), 61-69.
• Williams, A., Heins, M. H., 1964. Risk Management and Insurance. New York: McGraw Hill Inc.
• Zafiropoulos, I., Metaxiotis and K., Askounis, D., 2005. Dynamic risk management system for the modelling, optimal adaptation and implementation of an ERP system. Information Management and Computer Secu-rity, 13(3), 212-223.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18559/ref.2020.4.3