Fostering Sustainable Development through the European Digital Single Market

• Autorzy: Ewa Latoszek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study is twofold. Firstly, it is believed to be the first study of its kind to explore the interconnectivity of the current stage of the EU's Digital Single Market (DSM)3 (European Commission, 2015c) and its development prospects within the framework of the EU and its Member States' SD approach. Secondly, it provides further evidence for the policy debate on the essential priorities of DSM deemed to be a stimulus to the future SD of the EU. It is an attempt to fill the existing gap in research conducted so far on SD and its correlation with the building process of the digital market in the EU. The task is to present by using the method of synthesis and deduction, the essence and milieu of the contemporary processes of building the DSM in the EU in the context of its potential influence for the SD of the EU and its Member States. Due to the interdisciplinary and complexity of the data analyses, mixed research methods were used to integrate quantitative and qualitative analyses and results.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Jednolity rynek cyfrowy; Wspieranie rozwoju regionalnego; Agenda 2030; Jednolity rynek wewnętrzny

EN

Sustainable development; Digital single market; Regional development support; Agenda 2030; European Single Market

• Czasopismo: Economics and Business Review
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 7 (21)
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 68-89

Twórcy

autor

Ewa Latoszek

• Politechnika Warszawska

Bibliografia

• Alves, E. E. C., & Biancarelli, A. M. (2020). Financial cooperation initiatives in Latin America: Conditions of origins, subsistence and eventual vanishing. Economics and Business Review, 20(4), 51-71. doi:10.18559/ebr.2020.4.4.
• Azmanova, A., & Pallemaerts, M. (Eds.) (2006). The European Union and sustainable development. Internal and external dimensions. Brussels: Brussels University Press.
• Bainbridge, W. S., & Roco, M. C. (2016). Science and technology convergence: With emphasis for nanotechnology-inspired convergence. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(7), 2-19. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3520-0.
• Barbier, E., Markandya, A., & Pearce, D. W. (1990). Environmental sustainability and cost-benefit analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 22(9), 1259-1266.
• Barlett, P. F., & Chase, G. W. (Eds.) (2013). Sustainability in higher education: Stories and strategies for transformation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Bayer, F., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, Ch., Itúrbide, A., Irribarren-Maestro, I., Reding, S. (2019). Investigating SSH research and publication practices in disciplinary and institutional contexts. A survey-based comparative approach in two universities. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 4, 1-18.
• Bexell, M., & Jönsson, K. (2017). Responsibility and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 13-29.
• Boas, I., Biermann, F., & Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 449-464.
• Bolcárová, P., & Kološta, S. (2015). Assessment of sustainable development in the EU 27 using aggregated SD Index. Ecological Indicators, 48, 699-705.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
• COM. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions European Data Strategy 66 final/10.03.2020. Brussels.
• Council of the European Union. (2020). Council Conclusions of 8 October 2020 on "Access to justice-harnessing the opportunities offered by digitalization". Brussels.
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advance mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Damioli, G., & Vértesy, D. (2020). The innovation output indicator 2019. JRC Technical Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• DEF. (2016). Digital empowerment foundation. Retrieved from http://defindia.org/.
• Diaconaşu, D. E., Crupenschi, V. M., & Pohoață, I. (2020). The sustainable development theory: A critical approach (vol. 1: The discourse of the founders). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
• Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast). Text with EEA relevance.
• Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/31/EC of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).
• Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2013). Growth still is good for the poor. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 6568). The Macroeconomics and Growth Team, Development Research Group. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.
• Domorenok, E. (2019). Governing sustainability in the EU. From political discourse to policy practices. Abington & New York: Routledge.
• Duch-Brown, N., & Martens, B. (2016). The economic impact of removing geo-blocking restrictions in the EU Digital Single Market. (Digital Economy Working Paper No.2016/02). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.
• Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.
• ENISA. (2017). Overview on the implementation and uptake of trust services: One year after the switch over. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security.
• European Commission. (2015a). Why we need a Digital Single Market. Retrieved June 20, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/dsm-factsheet_en.pdf.
• European Commission. (2015b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015D C0192&from=EN.
• European Commission. (2015c). Europe's Digital Single Market. Brussels, COM (2015), 192.
• European Commission. (2018a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme for the period 2021-2027. Explanatory memorandum 306 final. Brussels.
• European Commission. (2018b). Digital Single Market 2018, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/ en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligence.
• European Commission. (2020a). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Methodological Note. Retrieved June 6, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/desi.
• European Commission. (2020b). Shaping Europe's digital future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• European Parliament. (2017). Civil law rules on robotics. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa. eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.pdf.
• Giffi, C. (Ed.) (2019, July). Looking ahead. Staying ahead. Organizational transformation. Cyber. Future of mobility. Technology & Society, Deloitte Review, 25.
• Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433-448.
• Hák, T., Janousková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573.
• Hemmati, H., Dodds, F., & Enayati, J. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability. Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd London.
• Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 130-139.
• Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary General. (2019). Global sustainable development report: The future is now-Science for achieving sustainable development. New York: UN. Retrieved September 10, 2020 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf.
• Jejdling, F. (2019, June). Ericsson mobility report. Retrieved June 18, 2020 from https:// www.ericsson.com/assets/local/mobility-report/documents/2019/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2019.pdf.
• Komiyama, K. H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: Building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1.
• Krämer, J., Senellart, P., & de Streel, A. (2020). Making data portability more effective for the digital economy. Economic implications and regulatory challenges. Report. Brussels: CERRE.
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.
• Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
• Mărcuț, M. (2017). Crystalizing the EU digital policy. An exploration into the Digital Single Market. Cham: Springer.
• Mărcuț, M. (2019). Building a stronger Europe-Governing the Digital Single Market. In A. Adamczyk, M. Dziembała, A. Kłos & M. Pachocka (Eds.), EU facing current challenges, opportunities & conflicts (pp. 50-61). Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
• Matusiak, M., Stancova, K. C., Dosso, M., Daniels, C., & Miedzenski, M. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs roadmaps. Background paper: Overview of the existing STI for SDGs roadmapping methodologies. New York: UN.
• Miedzinski, M., Kanehira, N., Cervantes, M., Mealy, S., Kotani, R., & Bollati E. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs Roadmaps-Background Paper: International STI collaboration and investment for Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/269391_ BP_Roadmaps_IntlCollaberation_final_7_09_20.pdf.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Medicine, 3(3), 123-130. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.
• Mulder, P., & van Bergh, J. (2001, winter). Evolutionary economics theories of sustainable development. A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 32(1), 101-134.
• OECD. (2015). OECD DSTI/STP/MIN(2015)1, Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level: Creating our common future through science, technology and innovation. 20-21 October 2015, Daejeon. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/sti-ministerial-2015.html.
• Paris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-586.
• Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
• Redclift, M. (1993). Sustainable development: Needs, values, rights. Environmental Values, 2(1), 3-20. doi:10.3197/096327193776679981.
• Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G,, & Fuller, G. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).
• Scholte, J. A., & Söderbaum, F. (2017). A changing global development agenda?. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/08039410.2017.1275843.
• Scott, J. M., Petropoulos, G., & Yeung, T. (2019). Contribution to growth: The European Digital Single Market. Delivering economic benefits for citizens and businesses. Luxembourg: European Parliament.
• Stiglitz, J. (2019). People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. London: Penguin UK.
• Stone, A. (2017). These 17 goals have a triple bottom line. Retrieved October 14, 2020 from https:/ ecopreserve.net/sdg/.
• Streel de, A. (2019). The future of the digital market. Brussels: CERRE.
• The World in 2050. (2019). The digital revolution and sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
• Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. (2015). New York: United Nations. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
• UN. (2020). The sustainable development goals report 2019. New York: United Nations.
• UN Environment. (2020, March 3). Coronavirus outbreak highlights need to address threats to ecosystems and wildlife. Retrieved January 18, 2021 from https://www. unenvironment.org/news-andstories/story/coronavirusoutbreak-highlights-needaddress-threats-ecosystemsand-wildlife.
• Young, O. R. (1997). Global Governance: Drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Zanten van, J. A., & Tulder van, R. (2020). Towards nexus-based governance: Defining interactions between economic activities and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1-17. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1768452.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18559/ebr.2021.1.5