Innovation Activity in Industry and Business Support Organizations in Poland in 2013-2017

• Autorzy: Arkadiusz Świadek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: Business support organization's positive influence on innovation activity seems so obvious, but it is thought to find the systemic research that confirm such phenomenon form the one side. The author did not find papers with specific statistical interaction between them from the other one. Purpose: The main research goal is to assess the systemic importance of relationships between business environment institutions and the type of innovative activity in Poland. Research methodology: The survey was conducted in the years 2013-2017 on a group of 6,283 industrial companies in Poland (the primary database contained nearly eighty thousand active manufacturing enterprises with a 9% survey success rate). The author used multiregression logit models to describe the statistical significant relations between business support units and innovation activity in enterprises. Results: The positive feedback from the logit models show us homogeneity of the country system from the one side (the same direction influence) and heterogeneity from the other (differences between support units) that flows from these interactions. The impact of the BSO units were statistically significant, strong and positive in most cases, excluding some exceptions. Novelty: Appointment of systemic strength, direction and odds ratio of the impact the support units have on innovation activity in Poland. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Innowacje; Przemysł; Otoczenie biznesu

EN

Innovations; Industry; Business environment

• Czasopismo: Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: vol. 20, iss. 2
• Strony: 361-374

Twórcy

autor

Arkadiusz Świadek

• University of Zielona Gora, Poland

Bibliografia

• Ahmad, Z.A., Yekta, Z.A. (2010). Relationship between perceived organizational support, leadership behavior, and job satisfaction: An empirical study in Iran. Intangible Capital, 6 (2), 162-184. DOI: 10.3926/ic.2010.v6n2.p162-184.
• Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., Modrego, A. (2018). The influence of Science and Technology Park characteristics on firms' innovation results. Papers in Regional Science, 97 (2), 253-279. DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12253.
• Bakar, J.A., Mohamad, Z.Z., Sharmeela-Banu, S.A. (2015). Factors affecting female lecturer retention in private higher institution in Perak. Message From Utar President. 17. Retrieved from: www.researchgate.com (1.10.2018).
• Bartlett, W., Čučković, N. (2007, May). SME Policy and the Emerging Knowledge Economy in Croatia: Competitive Pressures and Employee Skills (pp. 111-113). In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on "Enterprise in Transition". Split-Bol.
• Borowiecki, R., Siuta-Tokarska, B. (2008). Problemy funkcjonowania i rozwoju małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Synteza badań i kierunki działania. Warszawa: Difin.
• Churski, P., Dominiak, J. (2012). Rola innowacji w kształtowaniu regionów rozwoju i stagnacji gospodarczej w Polsce. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 50 (4), 54-77.
• Díez-Vial, I., Montoro-Sánchez, Á. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park. Technovation, 50, 41-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001.
• Dominiak, J. (2013). Rola otoczenia biznesu w rozwoju regionalnym w Polsce. Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego, 22, 44-64.
• Ferguson, R., Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBFs - location, survival and growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (1), 5-17. DOI: 10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd.
• Goldberg, I. (2004). Polska a gospodarka oparta na wiedzy. W kierunku zwiększenia konkurencyjności Polski w Unii Europejskiej, Bank Światowy - Region Europy i Azji Centralnej. Washington DC: Departament Rozwoju Sektora Prywatnego.
• Hausknecht, J., Rodda, J.M., Howard, M.J. (2008). Targeted Employee Retention: Performance-Based and Job-Related Differences in Reported Reasons for Staying. CAHRS Working Paper Series.
• Huang, Y., Audretsch, D.B., Hewitt, M. (2013). Chinese technology transfer policy: The case of the national independent innovation demonstration zone of East Lake. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38 (6), 828-835. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9292-5.
• Kerr, W., Nanda, R. (2011). Financing constraints and entrepreneurship. In: D.B. Audretsch, O. Falck, S. Heblich (eds.), Handbook on research on innovation and entrepreneurship. London, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Komninos, N. (2013). Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. Routledge.
• Matusiak K.B. (2010). Uwarunkowania rozwoju infrastruktury wsparcia w Polsce. In: K.B. Matusiak (ed.), Ośrodki innowacji i przedsiębiorczości w Polsce. Raport 2010. Warszawa: PARP.
• Matusiak, K.B., Bąkowski, A. (2009). Centra transferu technologii. In: K.B. Matusiak (ed.), Ośrodki Innowacji i Przedsiębiorczości w Polsce. Raport 2009. PARP. Łódź-Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Organizatorów Ośrodków Innowacji i Przedsiębiorczości w Polsce.
• Mertl, J., Paprocka, A. (2003). Analiza istniejącej struktury wspierania przedsiębiorczości Ra-port 2003. Fundacja Inkubator. Retrieved from: www.rislodzkie.lodz.pl (3.09.2018).
• Murat Ar, I., Baki, B. (2011). Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation: Empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14 (2), 172-206.
• OECD, Eurostat (2005). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd Edition. Paris.
• Oh, D.S., Phillips, F., Park, S., Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004.
• Poznańska, K. (2001). Formy transferu technologii w krajach wysoko rozwiniętych i możliwości ich wykorzystania w gospodarce polskiej. In: K. Poznańska (ed.), Sfera badawczo-rozwojowa i przedsiębiorstwa w działalności innowacyjnej. Warszawa: Instytut Funkcjonowania Gospodarki Narodowej Szkoły Głównej Handlowej.
• Santarek, K. (ed.) (2008). Transfer technologii z uczelni do biznesu. Tworzenie mechanizmów transferu technologii. Warszawa: PARP.
• Vásquez-Urriago, Á.R., Barge-Gil, A., Rico, A.M. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45 (1), 137-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006.
• Wróblewski, M., Kwieciński, L. (2017). Technology Parks in Poland as an Element of Public Proinnovation Policy - Selected Results from Empirical Research. Central and Eastern European Review, 11 (1), 1-26. DOI: 10.1515/caeer-2018-0001.
• Yuan, C.H., Sun, H.J., Wang, T. (2012). Being dualism: government support, university knowledge creation and transfer efficiency. Studies in Science of Science, 9.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/foli-2020-0053