Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Research background: Innovation activities, especially the implementation of new products and processes are desirable phenomena in economic development. For this reason, phenomena that contribute to the implementation of new solutions in enterprises should be identified. These include sources of innovation activity. Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to identify those sources of innovation activity that significantly affect product and process innovation. Research methodology: The research of the impact of sources of ideas and information for innovation on the implementation of product and process innovations was conducted in 2018 for the period 2015-2017 in the West Pomerania Province. The study was representative. It was attended by 270 entrepreneurs whose business profile corresponds to section C PKD (Polish Business Classification) - manufacturing. Logit modeling was used in the study. Results: As a result of the analyses it was noticed that in the region the implementation of process innovations was significantly influenced by foreign R&D centres, suppliers (but only when entrepreneurs began to cooperate with them), as well as by conferences, fairs and exhibitions. In the case of product innovations, internal resources were included in this group. Novelty: In the analyzed region, no advanced econometric analysis of the impact of sources of innovative activity on product and process innovations that would be representative was carried out. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
168-182
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- University of Zielona Góra, Poland
Bibliografia
- Bai, W.S., Johanson, M., Martin, O.M. (2019). Dual Business Relationships, Opportunity Knowledge, and New Product Development: A Study on Returnee Young Ventures. Journal of international marketing, 27 (3), 26-42. DOI: 10.1177/1069031X19852961.
- Basit, S.A., Medase, K. (2019). The diversity of knowledge sources and its impact on firm level innovation Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22 (4), 681-714. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-10-2018-0232.
- Brinks, V. (2019). 'And Since I Knew About the Possibilities There horizontal ellipsis': The Role of Open Creative Labs in User Innovation Processes. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 110 (4), 381-394. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12353.
- Danieluk, B. (2010). Zastosowanie regresji logistycznej w badaniach eksperymentalnych, Psychologia społeczna, 5 (2-3 (14)), 199-216.
- Doloreux, D., Turkina, E., Van Assche, A. (2019). Innovation type and external knowledge search strategies in KIBS: evidence from Canada. Service Business, 13 (3), 509-530. DOI: 10.1007/s11628-018-00393-y.
- Hamdi-Kidar, L., Keinz, P., Le Nagard, E., Vernette, E. (2019). Comparing Lead Users to Emergent-Nature Consumers as Sources of Innovation at Early Stages of New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36 (5), 616-631. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12500.
- Homfeldt, F., Rese, A., Simon, F. (2019). Suppliers versus start-ups: Where do better innovation ideas come from? Research policy, 48 (7), 1738-1757. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.002.
- Jeong, S.W., Chung, J.E., Roh, J.S. (2019). Impact of External Knowledge Inflow on Product and Process Innovation of Korean SMEs: Absorptive Capacity as a Mediator. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 37 (4), 219-234. DOI: 10.1177/0887302X19860913.
- Medhi, P.K., Jain, P., Jain, T. (2019). Effects of information sources for new customers and suppliers on the immediate innovation output of firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22 (4), 660-680. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0202.
- Palma, F.C., Trimi, S., Hong, S.G. (2019). Motivation triggers for customer participation in value co-creation. Service Business, 13 (3), 557-580. DOI: 10.1007/s11628-018-00395-w.
- OECD, Eurostat (2005). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Third edition. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9789264013100-en.
- OECD, Eurostat (2018). Oslo Manual 2018. Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th Edition. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. DOI: 10.1787/9789264304604-en.
- Pieri, F., Vecchi, M., Venturini, F. (2018). Modelling the joint impact of R&D and ICT on productivity: A frontier analysis approach. Research Policy, 47 (9), 1842-1852. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.013.
- Scandura, A. (2019). The role of scientific and market knowledge in the inventive process: evidence from a survey of industrial inventors. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44 (4), 1029-1069. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-017-9643-3.
- Schot, J., Steinmueller, W.E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47 (9), 1554-1567. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
- Stanisz, A. (2007). Przystępny kurs statystyki. Tom 2. Modele liniowe i nieliniowe. Kraków: Statsoft.
- Świadek, A. (2011). Regionalne systemy innowacji w Polsce. Warszawa: Difin.
- Tojeiro-Rivero, D., Moreno, R., Badillo, E.R. (2019). Radical Innovations: The Role of Knowledge Acquisition from Abroad. Review of Industrial Organization, 55 (2), 173-207. DOI: 10.1007/s11151-018-9659-3.
- Yu, S.H., Chen, H.C. (2019). External knowledge, intraorganisational networks and exploratory innovation: an empirical examination. Innovation-Organization & Management, Early Access. DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2019.1642764
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171613847