I nvesting in Ministries of Foreign Affairs: Building Diplomatic Capacity to Increase Soft Power

• Autorzy: Patricio Garza-Giron , Jorge A. Schiavon
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

States' foreign policy strategies aimed at promoting their values, cultures, and policies (soft power), as well as at advancing their interests have intensified by over 100% in the last 25 years. This article seeks to explain the increasing level of soft power around the world and its variations among states. Using a quantitative model, it argues that states which invest more resources in their Ministries of Foreign Affairs, thus building diplomatic capacity, are the ones that exert higher levels of soft power in world affairs.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Polityka zagraniczna; Promocja; Kultura; Kompetencje miękkie; Polityka państwowa; Państwo; Polityka gospodarcza państwa; Wizerunek państwa; Miękka siła

EN

Foreign policy; Promotion; Culture; Soft competencies; State policy; State; State economic policy; Image of the country; Soft power

• Czasopismo: Stosunki Międzynarodowe
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 55
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 7-23

Twórcy

autor

Patricio Garza-Giron

autor

Jorge A. Schiavon

Bibliografia

• J. Nye, 'Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics', Public Affairs, 2004.
• J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy, Soft Power in International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
• M. Leonard, 'Public Diplomacy', The Foreign Policy Centre, 2002.
• S. Aghazadeh, 'Public Diplomacy for a Global World: The United States and Iran', Master's thesis: San Jose State University, 2015, http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4524.
• A. Rozental, A. Buenrostro, 'Bilateral Diplomacy', in: Andrew F. Cooper, Jorge Heine and Ramesh Thaku (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 229-246.
• A. Cooper, B. Hocking, W. Maley. Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart?, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
• Statista, 'Changes in the number of non-governmental organizations (NGO's) with consultative status with ECOSOC, 1948 to 2010', Statista, 2018, https://www.statista.com/statistics/268357/changes-in-the-number-of-ngos-worldwide-since-1948/ (accessed on 25 November 2018).
• Statista, 2018, https://www.statista.com/statistics/209096/share-of-internet-users-in-the-total-world-population-since-2006/ (accessed on 25 November 2018).
• S. Lee, Transforming Global Governance with Middle Power Diplomacy: South Korea's Role in the 21st Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
• I. Kalin, 'Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in Turkey', Perceptions, 2011, No. 16, pp. 5-23.
• D. Malone, 'Soft Power in Indian Foreign Policy', Economic and Political Weekly, 2011, No. 46, pp. 35-39.
• E. Gilboa, 'Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy', The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, No. 616(1), 2008, pp. 55-77.
• J.-R. Leguey- -Feilleux, The dynamics of diplomacy, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2009.
• A. Vulving, 'How Soft Power Works', SSRN, 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1466220.
• J. McClory, 'The Soft Power 30. A Global Ranking of Soft Power 2016', 2016, https://softpower30. com (accessed on 25 November 2018).
• Ernst & Young, 'Rapid-growth markets soft power index. Spring 2012', 2012, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Rapid-growth_markets:_Soft_power_index/$FILE/ Rapid-growth_markets-Soft_Power_Index-Spring_2012.pdf, (accessed on 25 November 2018).
• J. Trunkos, 'What is Soft Power capability and how does it impact Foreign Policy', Ph.D. Prospectus Proposal, University of South Carolina, 2013, http://culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/content/pdf/participant-papers/2013-acdusa/ What-Is-Soft-Power-Capability-And-How-Does-It-Impact-Foreign-Policy--Judit-Trunkos.pdf.
• P. Morriss, Power: A philosophical analysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.
• G. Wiseman, 'Public Diplomacy and Hostile Nations', The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, No. 14(1-2), 2019, pp. 134-153.
• R. Cohen, Theatre of power: the art of diplomatic signaling, London and New York: Longman, 1987.
• N. Cull, The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy, 1945-1989, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
• S. Bry, 'Brazil's Soft -Power Strategy: The Political Aspirations of South-South Development Cooperation', Foreign Policy Analysis, No. 13, 2007, pp. 297-316.
• L. Baños Rivas, 'Reflexiones sobre la diplomacia pública en México. Una mirada prospectiva', Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior, No. 85, 2008-09, pp. 137-165.
• Y. Wang, 'Public Diplomacy and the Rise of Chinese Soft Power', The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, No. 616, 2008, pp. 257-273.
• M. Li, Soft Power: China's Emerging Strategy in International Relations, Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2009.
• B. Hocking, 'Catalytic Diplomacy: Beyond "Newness" and "Decline"', in: Jan Melissen (ed.) Innovation in Diplomatic Practice, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999, pp. 19-42.
• D. Clarck, 'Neoliberalism and Public Service Reform: Canada in Comparative Perspective', Canadian Journal of Political Science, No. 35, 2002, pp. 771-793.
• A. Cooper, T. Shaw, The Diplomacies of Small States: Between Vulnerability and Resilience, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• A. Cooper, B. Hocking, W. Maley, Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart?, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
• C. Jérémie, V. Pouliot, 'Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda', Cooperation and Conflict, No. 50, 2015, pp. 297-315.
• J. Robertson, Diplomatic Style and Foreign Policy: A Case Study of South Korea, New York: Routledge, 2016.
• C. Lequesne, Ethnographie du Quai d'Orsay. Les pratiques des diplomates français, Paris: CNRS Editions, 2017.
• J. Schiavon, B. Figueroa, 'Brasil y México: Inversión y capacidades en política exterior', Foreign Policy Edición Mexicana, No. 3, 2014, pp. 12-15.
• K. Rana, The Contemporary Embassy: Paths to Excellence, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
• V. Naumescu, 'Diplomatic Services Today: Between Political Decisions and Administrative Criteria1, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, No. 44, 2015, pp. 161-179.
• J. Pamment, British Public Diplomacy and Soft Power: Diplomatic Influence and the Digital Revolution, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
• S. Murray, 'The Present and Future of Diplomacy and Diplomatic Studies', International Studies Review, No. 13, 2011, pp. 709-728.
• Elcano Royal Institute, 'Global Presence Index', 2017, http://www.globalpresence.realinstitutoelcano. org (accessed on 25 November 2018).
• N. Schenkkan, 'Nations in Transit 2018: Confronting Illiberalism', Freedom House, 2018, https:// freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nations-transit-2018, (accessed on 20 May 2018).
• World Bank, 'GDP Ranking', 2018, https://data.worldbank.org (accessed on 25 November 2018).
• Lowy Institute, 'Global Diplomacy Index 2016', 2016, https://globaldiplomacyindex.lowyinstitute. org (accessed on 25 November 2018).
• G. Maihold, Z. Villamar, 'El G20 y los países emergentes', Foro Internacional, No. 56(1), 2016, pp. 165-211.
• J. Schiavon, D. Domínguez, 'Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, and Australia (MIKTA): Middle, Regional, and Constructive Powers Providing Global Governance', Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies, No. 3(3), 2016, pp. 495-504.
• E. Jordaan, 'The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers', Politikon: South Africa Journal of Political Studies, No. 30, 2003, pp. 165-181.
• G. Berridge, A. James, A Dictionary of Diplomacy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
• B. Hocking, 'The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the National Diplomatic System', in: Pauline Kerr and Geoffrey Wiseman (eds.), Diplomacy in a Globalizing World: Theories and Practices, New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
• A. Cooper, J. Cornut, 'The changing practices of frontline diplomacy: New directions for inquiry', Review of International Studies, No. 45(2), 2019, pp. 300-319.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7366/020909611201901