Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The objective of the article is an analysis of the Epic of Gilgamesh from the perspective of political philosophy.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The main research problem undertaken in this article is the problem of human nature and its connection with political power in light of the Sumero-Akkadian Epic of Gilgamesh. The article is based on an analysis of the source text (the Epic of Gilgamesh) in the English version by Andrew George, with the secondary literature also taken into consideration.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The point of departure is a justification of the subject undertaken here, with a reference to Leo Strauss' political philosophy. Next, three key aspects of the subject matter are analyzed: the humanization of Enkidu, the search for immortality, and the conception of political power.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The main result of the scientific analysis is the indication of themes concerning the significance and understanding of human nature and their relationship to the concept of political power that formed in Mesopotamia.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: In the conclusions, the author indicates the unmistakable presence of a notion of human nature in Sumero-Akkadian reflection, as well as the connection between this notion of human nature and a paradigm of political power. The author also points to a religious aspect crucial for understanding these concepts. (original abstract)
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The main research problem undertaken in this article is the problem of human nature and its connection with political power in light of the Sumero-Akkadian Epic of Gilgamesh. The article is based on an analysis of the source text (the Epic of Gilgamesh) in the English version by Andrew George, with the secondary literature also taken into consideration.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The point of departure is a justification of the subject undertaken here, with a reference to Leo Strauss' political philosophy. Next, three key aspects of the subject matter are analyzed: the humanization of Enkidu, the search for immortality, and the conception of political power.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The main result of the scientific analysis is the indication of themes concerning the significance and understanding of human nature and their relationship to the concept of political power that formed in Mesopotamia.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: In the conclusions, the author indicates the unmistakable presence of a notion of human nature in Sumero-Akkadian reflection, as well as the connection between this notion of human nature and a paradigm of political power. The author also points to a religious aspect crucial for understanding these concepts. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
31-46
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow
Bibliografia
- Abusch, T. (2015). Male and Female in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Encounters, Literary History, and Interpretation. Eisenbrauns.
- Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2017). In the Garden of the Gods. Models of Kingship from the Sumerians to the Seleucids. Routledge.
- Bailey, J.A. (1970). Initiation and the Primal Woman in Gilgamesh and Genesis 2-3. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 89, No. 2, 137-150.
- Crawford, H. (1991). Sumer and the Sumerians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dalley, S. (2009). Myths from Mesopotomia. Creation, the Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gadotti, A. (2014). "Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld" and the Sumerian Gilgamesh Cycle. De Gruyter.
- George, A. (2000). The Epic of Gilgamesh. A New Translation. Penguin Classics.
- George, A. (2003). The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic. Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts. Vol. 1-2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- George, A.R. (2018). Enkidu and the Harlot: Another Fragment of Old Babylonian Gilgameš. Zeitschrift fűr Assyriologie, 108 (1), 10-21.
- Jacobsen, T. (1943). Primitive Democracy in Ancient Mesopotomia. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. II, No. 3, 159-172.
- Jacobsen, T. (1957). Early Political Development in Mesopotamia. Zeitschrift fűr Assyriologie, Vol. 52, No. 1, 91-140.
- Jacobsen, T. (1977). Mesopotamia. In: H. and H.A. Frankfort, J.A. Wilson, T. Jacobsen, & W.A. Irwin (eds.), The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man. An Essay on Speculative Thought in the Ancient Near East. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 125-219.
- Kramer, S.N. (1963). The Sumerians. Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Oppenheim, A.L. (1948). Mesopotamian Mythology II. Orientalia, 17, 17-58.
- Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via Nurture. Genes, Experience, and What Makes Us Human. Harper Collins Publishers.
- Rubio, G. (2014). Gilgamesh and the "ius primae noctis". In: M. Kozuh, W.F.M. Henkelman, C.E. Jones, & C. Woods (eds.), Extraction & Control. Studies in Honor of Matthew W. Stolper, Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, No. 68.
- Sandars, N.K. (1960). The Epic of Gilgamesh. Penguin Classics.
- Sapolsky, R.M. (2004). Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers: A Guide to Stress, Stress-Related Diseases, and Coping. 3rd edition. Henry Holt.
- Sapolsky, R.M. (2006). Monkeyluv. And Other Essays on Our Lives as Animals. Vintage Books.
- Strauss, L. (1981). Progress or Return? The Contemporary Crisis in Western Civilization. Modern Judaism, Vol. 1, 17-45.
- Tigay, J.H. (2002) The Evolution of the Gilgamesh Epic. Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171603553
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.