Sustainable Development of the Urban Agglomeration through the Creation of an Urban Network of Protected Areas: Case Study of Kyiv City Urban Ecosystem

• Autorzy: Margaryta Radomska , Larysa Cherniak , Innokentii Horobtsov , Oleksandra Kolotylo

Warianty tytułu

Zrównoważony rozwój aglomeracji miejskiej poprzez stworzenie sieci miejskiej obszarów chronionych. Studium przypadku miejskiego ekosystemu Kijowa

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Potrzeba poprawy jakości środowiska na terytorium miast wynika z jego wpływu na zdrowie ludzi. Jednak ludzie nie są jedynymi mieszkańcami ekosystemów miejskich, zamieszkują je także inne organizmy, wykorzystując miasto jako swoje siedlisko. Rozwój miast jest współcześnie stałym trendem i wchodzi w konflikt z dziką przyrodą i jakością środowiska. Zrównoważony rozwój miast jest niemożliwy bez ochrony środowiska, postępu gospodarczego i korzyści dla społeczności lokalnych, dlatego tworzenie obszarów chronionych w Kijowie może stanowić narzędzie wspierania różnorodności biologicznej i stabilizacji ekosystemów miejskich. W artykule przedstawiono najważniejsze wymagania dotyczące obiektów, które mają zostać włączone do systemu obszarów chronionych. Pierwsze dwa dotyczą małych jezior, które mogą służyć ochronie środowiska, rekreacji i przyrodzie. Korzyści wynikające z utworzenia miejskiej sieci obszarów chronionych zostały określone dla ekosystemu miejskiego oraz społeczno-gospodarczej sytuacji miasta. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The need for improvement of the environment quality at the territory of cities is directly conditioned by its impact on the health of humans. At the same time humans are not the only residents of urban ecosystems, but they are also inhabited by other organisms, using city as their habitat. The growth of cities is a stable trend of the modern times and it comes into conflict with wildlife living activity and quality of environment. Sustainable development of cities is impossible without environment protection, economic progress and benefits for local communities, therefore the creation of protected areas groups within the city of Kyiv is offered as an instrument for biodiversity support and urban ecosystem stabilization. The most important requirements to the sites to be included into the system of protected areas have been formulated. The first two cores are developed based on small lakes, which are characterized with environmental, recreational and wildlife support potential. The benefits from the creation of the urban network of protected areas have been defined for urban ecosystem and social and economic situation in the city. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Miasto; Rozwój miasta; Rozwój zrównoważony; Ekosystem; Obszary chronione

EN

City; City development; Sustainable development; Ecosystem; Protected area

• Czasopismo: Studia Periegetica
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 4(24) Tourism and Recreation in Cities and Regions Development
• Strony: 59-75

Twórcy

autor

Margaryta Radomska

• National Aviation University, Ukraine

autor

Larysa Cherniak

• National Aviation University, Ukraine

autor

Innokentii Horobtsov

• National Aviation University, Ukraine

autor

Oleksandra Kolotylo

• National Aviation University, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• Adams L.W., 1994, Urban wildlife habitats: a landscape perspective, Minneapolis: University Minnesota Press.
• Adams L.H., Dove L.E., 1989, Wildlife reserves and corridors in the urban environment: a guide to ecological landscape planning and resource conservation, Columbia: National Institute for Urban Wildlife.
• Anakhov P.V., Kucheryawa I.M., Sorokina N.L., 2018, Use of water resources of Kiev in the past and present, Hydropower of Ukraine, 3-4, 76-80.
• Batog S.V., 2017, Ecological and hydrological characteristics of Kyiv waters bodies: PhD Thesis, Geography.
• Blair R.B., 2001, Creating a homogeneous avifauna, in: Avian conservation and ecology in an urbanizing world, eds J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, R. Donnelly, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Clergeau P., Mennechez G., Sauvage A., Lemoine A., 2001, Human perception and appreciation of birds: A motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France, in: Avian ecology in an urbanizing world, eds J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, R. Donnelly, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Czech B., Krausman P.R., 1997, Distribution and causation of species endangerment in the United States, Science, 277, 1116-1117.
• Donnelly R., Marzluff J.M., 2004, Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation, Conservation Biology, 18, 733-745.
• Ecological passport of Kyiv, 2018, Kyiv: Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine.
• Edgar D.R., Kershaw G.P., 1994, The density and diversity of the bird populations in three residential communities in Edmonton, Alberta, Canadian Field-Naturalist, 108, 156-161.
• Emlen J.T., 1974, An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation, Condor, 76, 184-197.
• Girault C., 2017, Between naturalness and urbanity, how are protected areas integrated into cities? The case of Helsinki (Finland), Articulo. Journal of Urban Research, 16, 32-48; DOI: 10.4000/articulo.3270.
• Lancaster R.K., Rees W.E., 1979, Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57, 2358-2368.
• Leedy D.L., Adams L.W., 1984, A guide to urban wildlife management, Columbia: National Institute for Urban Wildlife.
• Lenzen M., Moran D., Kanemoto K., Foran B., Lobefaro L., A. Geschke, 2010, International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations, Nature, 486, 109-112.
• Marzluff J.M., Rodewald A.D., 2008, Conserving Biodiversity in Urbanizing Areas: Nontraditional Views from a Bird's Perspective, Cities and the Environment, 1(2), 1-27.
• McKinney M.L., 2002, Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation, BioScience, 52, 883-890.
• Melles S.J., 2005, Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia, Urban habitats, 3(1), 25-48.
• Miller J.R., Hobbs R.J., 2002, Conservation where people live and work, Conservation Biology, 16(2), 24-39.
• Pickett S.T.A., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., Nilon C.H., Pouyat R.V., Zipperer W.C., Costanza R., 2001, Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127-157.
• Rodary E., Bruno-Lézy L., Dellier J., Guyot S., Landy F., 2018, The Quest for Naturbanity, in Urban National Parks to Natured Cities in the Global South, Singapore: Springer; DOI: 1-31. 10.1007/978-981-10-8462-1_1.
• Rosenzweig M.L., 2003, Win-win ecology: How the earth's species can survive in the midst of human enterprise, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sanderson E.W., Huron A., 2011, Conservation in the City, Conservation Biology, 25(3), 421-423; DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01683.x.
• Shafer C.L., 1997, Terrestrial nature reserve design at the urban/rural interface, in: Conservation in highly fragmented landscapes, ed. M.W. Schwartz, New York: Chapman and Hall.
• Shochat E., Lerman S., Fernández-Juricic E., 2010, Birds in urban ecosystems: population dynamics, community structure, biodiversity, and conservation, Urban Ecosystem Ecology, 55, 75-86; DOI:10.2134/agronmonogr55.c4.
• Soulé M.E., 1991, Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape, APA Journal Summer, 3, 313-323.
• Turner W., Nakamura T., Dinetti M., 2004, Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature, Bioscience, 54(6), 585-590.
• Vasilyuk O., Kostiushin V., Norenko K., Plyga A., Beautiful E., Kolomytsev G., Faikova M., 2012, Nature reserve fund of Kyiv region, Kyiv: National Ecological Center of Ukraine.
• World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, 2018, New York: United Nations.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26349/st.per.0024.04