Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Objective: The objective of the article is to discuss the impact of conflicts in foreign business relationships on the performance of SMEs. Two possible ways in which conflicts influence the company's performance are considered: direct (conflicts → company's performance) and indirect (conflicts → business relationships → company's performance).
Research Design & Methods: The article uses the case study method and presents the results of a study of 13 SMEs operating in international markets.
Findings: The article proposes a model of the positive impact of conflicts in foreign business relationships on SME performance. A model links relational and operational sources of conflicts with their direct and indirect (through relationships) impact on SME performance and positive and negative outcomes.
Implications & Recommendations: The article provides information how to transform conflicts in foreign business relationships into positive outcomes. A crucial role in this respect is played by moderators: trust and informal relationship development, cultural awareness and formal action development.
Contribution & Value Added: The originality of the study is that it identifies the main operational and relational sources of conflict situations that impact (directly and indirectly) SMEs performance in their international activities. The identified 4 moderators, by positively impacting SMEs foreign relationship in conflict situations, help these companies to obtain positive conflict outcomes. (original abstract)
Research Design & Methods: The article uses the case study method and presents the results of a study of 13 SMEs operating in international markets.
Findings: The article proposes a model of the positive impact of conflicts in foreign business relationships on SME performance. A model links relational and operational sources of conflicts with their direct and indirect (through relationships) impact on SME performance and positive and negative outcomes.
Implications & Recommendations: The article provides information how to transform conflicts in foreign business relationships into positive outcomes. A crucial role in this respect is played by moderators: trust and informal relationship development, cultural awareness and formal action development.
Contribution & Value Added: The originality of the study is that it identifies the main operational and relational sources of conflict situations that impact (directly and indirectly) SMEs performance in their international activities. The identified 4 moderators, by positively impacting SMEs foreign relationship in conflict situations, help these companies to obtain positive conflict outcomes. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
171-183
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
autor
- Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
autor
- Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
Bibliografia
- Deszczyński, B., Fonfara, K., & Dymitrowski, A. (2017). The Role of Relationships in Initiating the Internationalisation Process in B2B Markets. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER. 2017.050404
- Duarte, M., & Davies, G. (2003). Testing the conflict-performance assumption in business-to-business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00223-7
- Easton, G. (1998). Case Research as a Methodology for Industrial Network: A Realist Approach. In P. Naudé & P.W. Turnbull (Eds.), Network Dynamics in Marketing (pp. 73-87). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10. 2307/20159839
- Ellis, P.D. (2011). Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 99-127. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.20
- Finch, J., Zhang, S., & Geiger, S. (2013). Managing in conflict: How actors distribute conflict in an industrial network. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), 1063-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.024
- Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Retrieved on May 26, 2018 from www.uncg.edu/hdf/facultystaff/Tudge/Guba%20&%20Lincoln%201994.pdf
- Lam, P.K., & Chin, K.S. (2005). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for conflict management in collaborative new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 761-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.12.006
- Leonidou, L.C., Barnes, B.R., & Talias, M.A. (2006). Exporter-importer relationship quality: The inhibiting role of uncertainty, distance, and conflict. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 576-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.012
- Lin, X., & Germain, R. (1998). Sustaining satisfactory joint venture relationships: The role of conflict resolution strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 179-196. https://doi.org /10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490031
- Lumineau, F., Eckerd, S., & Handley, S. (2015). Inter-organizational conflicts. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 1(1), 42-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055563614568493
- Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. (2004). Qualitative Research Methods in International Business: The State of the Art. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business (pp. 5-24). Northhampton: Edward Elgar.
- Mele, C. (2011). Conflicts and value co-creation in project networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1377-1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.033
- Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Datta, D.K. (2010). The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.12.003
- Nordin, F. (2006). Identifying intraorganisational and interorganisational alliance conflicts - A longitudinal study of an alliance pilot project in the high technology industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.12.010
- Ntayi, J.M. (2012). Emotional outcomes of Ugandan SME buyer-supplier contractual conflicts. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(1/2), 125-141. https://doi. org/10.1108/03068291211188901
- Pangarkar, N. (2008). Internationalization and performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jwb.2007.11.009
- Plank, R.E., & Newell, S.J. (2007). The effect of social conflict on relationship loyalty in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.03.012
- Rose, G.M., & Shoham, A. (2004). Interorganizational task and emotional conflict with international channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 942-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00490-3
- Skarmeas, D. (2006). The role of functional conflict in international buyer-seller relationships: Implications for industrial exporters. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 567-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.013
- Vaaland, T.I. (2004). Improving project collaboration: Start with the conflicts. International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2003.11.003
- Vaaland, T.I., & Håkansson, H. (2003). Exploring interorganizational conflict in complex projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0019-8501(02)00227-4
- Vaaland, T.I., Haugland, S.A., & Purchase, S. (2004). Why Do Business Partners Divorce? The Role of Cultural Distance in Inter-Firm Conflict Behavior. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 11(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v11n04_01
- Welch, C., & Wilkinson, I. (2005). Network perspectives on interfirm conflict: Reassessing a critical case in international business. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00495-2
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171522611