Influencing the commercialization of innovative research results in universities of economics and business

• Autorzy: Aleksandra Szulczewska-Remi
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The majority of knowledge and technology transfer models relate to universities of technology and natural sciences whose commercialization potential allows them easily to adapt their outcomes to market demands. This, however, is not the case for universities of economics and business. Therefore, the aim of this paper relied on systematic literature studies performed with the use of a snowball sampling method. It was followed by an empirical study comprising nearly 60 in-depth interviews, 20 innovation audits and seven intellectual property valuations in Special Purpose Entity of Poznan University of Economics and Business. The study attempts to fulfil a research gap concerning the role of business schools in the commercialization of scientific research in Poland and other CEE countries.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Ośrodki innowacji; Transfer wiedzy; Komercjalizacja wiedzy; Innowacje; Spółka celowa

EN

Innovation centre; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge commercialisation; Innovations; Special-purpose entity

• Czasopismo: Acta Innovations
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: nr 22
• Strony: 30-39

Twórcy

autor

Aleksandra Szulczewska-Remi

• Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland

Bibliografia

• M. Guerrero, D. Urbano, A. Fayolle, A., Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities, J Technol Transf, (2014) doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4.
• J.G. Wissema, Towards The Third Generation University, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
• F. Cesaroni, A. Piccaluga, The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: towards the third mission in Italy, J Technol Transf (2015) doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9401-3.
• H. Etzkowitz, The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation, New York: Routledge, 2008.
• L. Leydesdorff, The Triple Helix Model and the study of Knowledge Based Inovation Systems, Int. Journal of Contemporary Sociology 42(1) (2005) 12-27.
• E.G. Carayannis, D.F.J. Campbell, 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, Int J Technol Manag 46(3) (2009) 201-234.
• E.G. Carayannis, D.F.J. Campbell, Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation, and environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 1(1) (2010) 41-69.
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) 2007. Higher Education and Regions, Policy Brief, September 2007. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
• J. Korpysa, Schumpeterian entrepreneurship in academic spin off companies in Poland, Transformations in Business & Economics 13(3) (2014) 42-59.
• J. Bercovitz, M. Feldman, Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development, J Technol Transf 31(1) (2006) 175-188.
• M. Wright, E. Piva, S. Mosej, A. Lockett, Academic entrepreneurship and business schools, J Technol Transf 34 (2009) 560-587.
• Z. Gal, P. Ptacek, The Role of Mid-Range Universities in Knowledge Transfer in Non-Metropolitan Regions in Central Eastern Europe, European Planning Studies 19(9) (2011) 1669 - 1690.
• P. D'Este, P. Patel, University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?, Research Policy 36 (2007) 1295-1313.
• S.A. Shane, Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publiishing, 2004.
• B. Clarysse, M. Wright, A. Lockett, P. Mustar, M. Knockaert, Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising, Ind Corp Change 16(4) (2007) 609-640.
• R. Fini, R. Grimaldi, S. Santoni, M. Sobrero, Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs, Research Policy 40(8) (2011) 1113-1127.
• W.M. Cohen, R.R. Nelson, J.P. Walsh, Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D, Management Science 48 (1) (2002) 1-23.
• D. Schartinger, A. Schibany, H. Gassler, Interactive relations between university and firms: empirical evidence for Austria, J Technol Transf 26 (2001) 255-268.
• A. Arundel, A. Geuna, Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13 (6) (2004) 559-580.
• M. Perkmann, K. Walsh, University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda, IJMR 9(4) (2007) 259-280.
• A. Kochencova, R. Grimaldi, F. Munari, Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: a review of academic literature, J Technol Transf (2015) doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9416-9.
• E. Rasmussen, M.P. Rice, A framework for government support mechanisms aimed at enhancing university technology transfer: The Norwegian case, International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 11(1/2) (2012) 1-25.
• E. Carayannis, I. Dubina, Thinking Beyond The Box: Game-Theoretic and Living Lab Approaches to Innovation Policy and Practice Improvement, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5(3) (2014) 427-439.
• W.F. Boh, U. De-Haan, R. Strom, University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: faculty and students in spinoffs, J Technol Transf (2015) doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2125203.
• R. Suddaby, R. Greenwood, Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of juris- dictional expansion in professional service firms, Human Relations (54) (2001) 933-953.
• K. Starkey, P. Madan, Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research, British Journal of Management Special issue 1 (2001) S77-S81.
• M. Wright, S. Birley, S. Mosey, Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer, J Technol Transf 29 (2004) 235-246.
• R. Khurana, From higher aims to hired hands: the social transformation of American business schools and the unfullied promise of manadement as a profession, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2007.
• A. Mesny, Ch. Mailhot, The commercialization of academic outputs i the administrative sciences: A multiple-case study in a university-based business school, Can J Adm Sci (2015) doi: 10.1002/CJAS.1331.
• KPMG, Private Equity market in Poland: facts versus opinions, KPMG, 2014, http://www.kpmg.com/PL/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/2014/Private-Equity-Market- in-Poland-Facts-and-Opinions-2014.pdf.
• World Bank, Poland. Enterprise Innovation Support Review, Kapil, Natasha, Marcin Piatkowski, Ismail Radwan and Juan Julio Gutierrez, the World Bank, 2013, http://www- wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/02/14/000356161_20130214144748/ Rendered/PDF/753250WP0P09660ATION0SUPPORT0REVIEW.pdf.
• J. Lecy, K. Beatty, Structured Literature Reviews Using Constrained Snowball Sampling and Citation Network Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal, (2012) doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1992601.
• M. Lisiński, Metody naukowe w metodologii nauk o zarządzaniu (Scientific methods in management sciences' methodology), Przegląd Organizacji 4 (2016) 11-19.
• R. Barski, T. Cook, Metodyka identyfikacji projektów do komercjalizacji na wyższych uczelniach, PARP, Zielona Góra/Oxford, 2011, http://www.parp.gov.pl/files/74/81/469/12765.pdf.
• J. Osiadacz, Proces audytu technologicznego w przedsiębiorstwach (The technology audit in enterprises), PARP, Wrocław, 2011.
• E.R.J. Bell, D.R. Kingham, A. Powell, Technology Audit Methodology and Case Example, London, Technology Transfer and Implementation Conference (TTI 92), 6-8 July 1992.
• T.T. Aldridge, D. Audretsch, S. Desai, V. Nadella, Scientist entrepreneurship across scientific fields, J Technol Transf (2014) doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9339-x.
• M. Gonzalez-López, I. Dileo, F., Losurdo, University-Industry Collaboration in the European Regional Context: the Cases of Galicia and Apulia Region, Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation (JEMI) 10(3) (2014) 57-87.
• R. Locke, Management and higher education since 1940, University Press Cambridge, Cambridge, 1989.
• S. Shane, F. Delmar, Planning for the market: Business planning before marketing and the continuation of organizing efforts, Journal of Business Venturing 19(6) (2004) 767-786.
• S. Arvanitis, U. Kubli, M. Worter M., University-Industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer in Switzerland: What University Scientists Think about Co-operation with Private Enterprises, Research Policy 37(10) (2008) 1865-1883.
• D. Markiewicz, Komercjalizacja wyników badań naukowych - krok po kroku (Commercialization of research results - step by step), CTT Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków, 2009.
• C.M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilema, Harvard Business School Press, Boston-Massachusetts, 1997.
• T.H. Byers, R.C. Dorf, A.J. Nelson, Technology Ventures: From Idea To Enterprise, Mc Graw Hill Education, New York, 2014.
• D.B. Audretsch, E.E. Lehmann, S. Paleari, S., Vismara, Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer, J Technol Transf, (2014) doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9381-8.
• J. Olmos-Penuela, E. Castro-Martmes, P. D'Este, Knowledge transfer activities in social Sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents, Research Policy 43 (2014) 696-706.
• R. Grimaldi, M. Kenney, D.S. Siegel, M. Wright, 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship, Research Policy 40(8) (2011) 1045-1067.
• D. Kopycińska, T. Bernat, J. Korpysa, Researching Students' Entreprerenurship Skills in Post - Socialist Countries: A Multi-country Survey Part 1, Transformations in Business & Economics 8 (2009) 22-41.
• N.D. Tho, N.T.M. Trang, Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings, Journal of Business Research 68 (2015) 1332-1340.
• S. Paton, R. Chia, G. Burt, Relevance or 'relevate'? How university business schools can add value through reflexively learning from strategic partnerships with business, Management Learning 45(3) (2014) 267-288.