The Impact of Business Cycle on Input and Output of Innovation Activity in UE Countries

• Autorzy: Arkadiusz Kijek , Anna Szymańska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The effect of business cycle on innovation activity of economic entities is ambiguous. There are both studies confirming pro-cyclical and as well as counter-cyclical pattern of innovation activity input, while the output of innovation activity is mainly considered procyclical. This study aims to analyze the impact of business cycle phases on input and output of innovation activity of economic agents. It uses the data for 26 EU countries and Norway in 2002-2016. The research applies panel data models for input and output of innovation activity with the business cycle indicators as explanatory variables. The findings confirm the complex relationship between innovation performance and business cycles, and they mostly support the pro-cyclical nature of R&D expenditures and patent grants.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Innowacje; Badania i rozwój (B+R); Patenty

EN

Innovations; Research & Development (R+D); Patent

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: t. 19, z. 1, cz. 1 Financial, Accounting and Economic Aspects of Contemporary Management
• Strony: 109-118

Twórcy

autor

Arkadiusz Kijek

• Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland

autor

Anna Szymańska

• University of Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Aghion P., Askenazy P., Berman N., Cette G., Eymard L. (2012), Credit Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France, "Journal of the European Economic Association", 10, pp. 1001-1024.
• Aghion P., Saint-Paul G. (1998), Virtues of bad times: Interaction between productivity growth and economic fluctuations, "Macroeconomic Dynamics", 2(3), pp. 322-344.
• Baltagi B.H. (2013), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, West Sussex.
• Barlevy G. (2007), On the Cyclicality of Research and Development, "American Economic Review", 97, pp. 1131-1164.
• Bovha-Padilla S., Damijan J.P., Konings J. (2009), Financial Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D investment: Evidence from Slovenia, LICOS Discussion Paper 239.
• Cohen W.M. (2010), Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance [in:] B.A. Hall, N. Rosenberg (eds.), Handbook of Economics of Innovation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 129-213.
• Francois P., Lloyd-Ellis H. (2003), Animal Spirits Through Creative Destruction, "American Economic Review", 93, pp. 530-550.
• Gali J., Hammour M.L. (1991), Long run effects of business cycles, "Discussion Papers 1991_18", Columbia University, Department of Economics.
• Himmelberg C.P., Petersen B.C. (1994), R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries, "Review of Economics and Statistics", 76(1), pp. 38-51.
• Hingley P., Park W.G. (2017), Do business cycle affect patenting? Evidence from European Patent Office filings, "Technological Forecasting & Social Change", 116, pp. 76-86.
• Judd K.L. (1985), On the Performance of Patents, "Econometrica", 53(3), pp. 567-585.
• Lopez-Garcia P., Montero J.M., Moral-Benito E. (2012), Business cycles and investment in intangibles: evidence from Spanish firms, Banco De Espana Working Paper No. 1219.
• Ouyang M. (2011), On the cyclicality of R&D, "The Review of Economics and Statistics", 93(2), pp. 542-553.
• Peters B., Dachs B., Dünser M., Hud M., Köhler C., Rammer C. (2014), Firm Growth, Innovation and the Business Cycle. Background Report for the 2014 Competitiveness Report, Mannheim: ZEW.
• Rafferty M., Funk M. (2008), Asymmetric effects of the business cycle on firm-financed R&D, "Economics of Innovation and New Technology", 17 (5), pp. 497-510.
• Schumpeter J.A. (1911), Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 8th ed, Dunckner & Humbolt, Berlin.
• Schumpeter J.A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Stiglitz J. (1993), Endogenous Growth and Cycles, "NBER Working Paper", no. 4286.