Dynamic Capabilities and Network Benefits

• Autorzy: Helge Svare , Anne Haugen Gausdal
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Istnieje coraz większa jest liczba inicjatyw finansowanych ze środków publicznych w celu ustanowienia lub wzmocnienia sieci i klastrów dla zwiększenia innowacyjności. Zwroty dotyczące takich inwestycji różnią się, a celem tego artykułu jest zbadanie, w jakim stopniu różnice w korzyściach dla firm uczestniczących w sieciach lub klastrach mogą być wyjaśnione przez ich dynamiczne zdolności (DC). Na podstawie danych z pięciu sieci norweskich wynika, że firmy z wyższym DC są bardziej skuteczne w zbieraniu potencjalnych korzyści płynących z członkostwa w sieci. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The number of publicly funded initiatives to establish or strengthen networks and clusters, in order to enhance innovation, has been increasing. Returns on such investments vary, and the aim of this study is to explore to what extent the variation in benefits for firms participating in networks or clusters can be explained by their dynamic capabilities (DC). Based on survey data from five Norwegian networks, the results suggest that firms with higher DC are more successful in harvesting the potential benefits of being member of a network. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Innowacje; Zdolności dynamiczne; Współpraca sieciowa

EN

Innovations; Dynamic capabilities; Network cooperation

• Czasopismo: Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI)
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 13
• Numer: nr 1 Innovation Capabilities : Affirming an Oxymoron?
• Strony: 117-146

Twórcy

autor

Helge Svare

• Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Norway

autor

Anne Haugen Gausdal

• University College of Southeast Norway

Bibliografia

• Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64-77.
• Anderson, A., Steinerte, E., & Russell, E. O. (2010). The nature of trust in virtual entrepreneurial networks. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 1 (1), 1-21.
• Arundel, A., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B.-Ä., & Valeyre, A. (2007). How Europe's economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 1175- 1210.
• Asheim, B., Arne, I., Moodysson, J., & Markku, S. (2011). Knowledge bases, modes of innovation and regional innovation policy: A theoretical reexamination with illustrations from the Nordic countries. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. XVII, 291 s.: ill.). London: Routledge.
• Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64- 77.
• Anderson, A., Steinerte, E., & Russell, E. O. (2010). The nature of trust in virtual entrepreneurial networks. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 1(1), 1-21.
• Arundel, A., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B.-Ä., & Valeyre, A. (2007). How Europe's economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 1175-1210.
• Asheim, B., Arne, I., Moodysson, J., & Markku, S. (2011). Knowledge bases, modes of innovation and regional innovation policy: A theoretical reexamination with illustrations from the Nordic countries. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. XVII, 291 s.: ill.). London: Routledge.
• Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945-974.
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98.
• D'Annunzio, C., Carattoli, M., & Dupleix, D. (2015). Dynamic capabilities associated with a firm's growth in developing countries. A comparative study of Argentinean SMEs in the software and tourism industries. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 11(4), 25- 62.
• Dalziel, M., & Parjanen, S. (2012). Measuring the impact of innovation intermediaries: A case study of Tekes. In H. Melkas & V. Harmaakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications (pp. xiii, 452 s.). Lahti: Springer.
• Danneels, E. (2000). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
• Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 211229.
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources if interorganizational competivite advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
• D0ving, E., & Gooderham, P. N. (2008). Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: The case of small firm accountancy practices. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 841- 857.
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 555-574.
• Freeman, C. (1993). The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
• Gassmann, O., Daiber, M., & Enkel, E. (2011). The role of intermediaries in cross-industry innovation processes. R&D Management, 41(5), 457-469.
• Gausdal, A., & Nilsen, E. (2011). Orchestrating innovative SME metworks. The case of "HealthInnovation". Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(4), 586-600.
• Gausdal, A. H. (2012). Trust-building processes in the context of networks. Journal of Trust Research, 2(1), 7-30.
• Gausdal, A. H., Svare, H., & Möllering, G. (2016). Why don't all high-trust Networks achieve strong network benefits? A case-based Exploration of Cooperation in Norwegian SME networks. Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), 194-212.
• Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91.
• Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831- 850.
• Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715 -728.
• H0yrup Pedersen, S. (2012). Employee-driven Innovation: a New Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
• Iansiti, M., & Clark, K. B. (1994). Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 557-605.
• Janssen, M. J., Castaldi, C., & Alexiev, A. (2016). Dynamic capabilities for service innovation: Conceptualization and measurement. R&D Management, 46(4), 797-811.
• Johnsen, I. H. G. (2012). Social capital and regional innovation systems: Bridging approaches and broadening understanding of knowledge sharing and innovation (p. 43). Lund: Lund University, Department of Human Geography.
• Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter- organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71- 89.
• Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 25-35.
• Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B.- A., Valeyre, A., & Holm, J. (2010). Organisational learning and systems of labour market regulation in Europe. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1141-1173.
• Lundvall, B.-Ä. (2010). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Anthem.
• Majumdar, S. K. (2000). Sluggish giants, sticky cultures, and dynamic capability transformation. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 59-78.
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. London: Macmillan.
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709734.
• Mitra, J., & Formica, P. (1997). Innovation and Economic Development: University-Enterprise Partnerships in Action. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.
• Olsen, N. V., Elvekrok, I., Gausdal, A. H., Nilsen, E. R., & Scholderer, J. (2013). Vertical vs. horizontal food networks; the implications for innovation. Paper presented at the Igls-Forum 2013, System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria.
• Pai, F.-Y., Chang, H.-F., & City, H. (2013). The effects of knowledge sharing and absorption on organizational innovation performance - A dynamic capabilities perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 8, 83-97.
• Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
• Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evinence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5-6(3-4), 137-168.
• Porter, M. E. (1998a). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-90.
• Porter, M. E. (1998b). The Competitive Advantage of Nations: With a New Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan Business.
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
• Rutten, R., & Boekema, F. (2007). Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9), 1834-1846.
• Svare, H. (2016). User-producer dialogue, workplace innovation, and knowledge in a Regional Innovation System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(2), 565-586.
• Sydow, J., Schüßler, E., & Müller-Seitz, G. (2016). Managing Interorganizational Relations - Debates and Cases. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education.
• Teece, D., & Leih, S. (2016). Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic capabilities. California Management Review, 58(4), 5-12.
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
• Teece, D. J. (2011). Dynamic capabilities: A guide for managers. Ivey Business Journal, 75(2), 29-32.
• Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8-37.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509- 533.
• Toedtling, F., Asheim, B., & Boschma, R. (2013). Knowledge sourcing, innovation and constructing advantage in regions of Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 161 - 169.
• Underthun, A., & Svare, H. (2015). Innovation through deliberate and strategic networks? Exploring regional innovation networks (RINs) in Eastern Norway Paper presented at the RIP Conference, Karlsruhe.
• Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269- 296.
• Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991- 995.
• Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7341/20171315