Wpływ wielkości rady dyrektorów na wartość przedsiębiorstwa

• Autorzy: Dariusz Siudak

Warianty tytułu

The Influence of the Size of the Board of Directors on the Value of the Company

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem pracy jest ocena wpływu wielkości rady dyrektorów na wartość przedsiębiorstwa. Rada dyrektorów może być postrzegana jako istotny zasób przedsiębiorstwa [Rodriguez-Fernandez, Fernandez-Alonso, Rodriguez-Rodriguez 2014], szczególnie ze względu na relacje jej członków z zewnętrznym otoczeniem. Jak wskazują autorzy [Barroso, Villegas, Perez-Calero 2011], problematyka ta usadowiona jest w teorii zależności zasobowej przedsiębiorstwa (resource dependence theory), zaproponowanej przez [Pfeffer, Salancik 2003/1978; Pfeffer 1987]. Podstawą teoretyczną jest założenie, że autonomia przedsiębiorstwa jest ograniczona przez jego zależność od posiadanych przez inne organizacje zasobów i wynikającą z niej potrzebę współpracy [Kaczmarek, Kimino, Pye 2014]. Teoria uzależnienia zasobowego podkreśla rolę rad dyrektorów w postaci kontroli otoczenia zewnętrznego [Yang, Cai 2011], definiując dodatkową funkcję rady dyrektorów w zakresie redukcji niepewności w otoczeniu poprzez relacje z otoczeniem w postaci interlocking directorates [Sankowska, Siudak 2015]. (fragment tekstu)

EN

The article discusses the impact of the size of the board of directors on the value of companies on the Polish capital market. According to the resource-dependence theory, the board of directors is seen as an important instrument in reducing uncertainty in the business environment by providing key resources controlled by external entities. Regression analysis shown statistically significant positive impact of the size of the board of directors on enterprise value measured by Tobin's Q ratio and market capitalization. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarząd; Wartość przedsiębiorstwa

EN

Board of directors; Enterprise value

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: t. 17, z. 9, cz. 2 Finansowe i organizacyjne aspekty kooperacji nauki i lokalnej przedsiębiorczości - badania i analizy. Część II
• Strony: 263-281

Twórcy

autor

Dariusz Siudak

• Politechnika Łódzka

Bibliografia

• Adams R., Mehran H. (2012), Bank Board Structure and Performance: Evidence for Large Bank Holding Companies, "Journal of Financial Intermediation", 12, ss. 243-267.
• Allen M. (1974), The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking Corporate Directorates, "American Sociological Review", vol. 39, No. 3, ss. 393-406.
• Ammer R., Ramli F., Zakaria H. (2010), A New Perspective on Board Composition and Firm Performance in an Emerging Market, "Corporate Governance", 10, ss. 647-661.
• Barroso C., Villegas M., Perez-Calero L. (2011), Board Influence on a Firm's Internationalization, "Corporate Governance: An International Review", 19, ss. 249-283.
• Bonne A., Field L., Karpoff J. and others (2007), The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition: An Empirical Analysis, "Journal of Financial Economics", 85, ss. 66-101.
• Bouwman C. (2011), Corporate Governance Propagation through Overlapping Directors, "The Review of Financial Studies", 24, ss. 2358-2394.
• Brickley J., Zimmerman J. (2010), Corporate Governance Myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay and Weber, "Journal of Accounting and Economics", 50, ss. 235-245.
• Cheng S. (2008), Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance, "Journal of Financial Economics", 87, ss. 157-176.
• Chhaochharia V., Grinstein Y. (2007), The Changing Structure of US Corporate Boards: 1997-2003, "Corporate Governance", 15, ss. 1215-1223.
• Choi J., Park S., Yoo S. (2007), The Value of Outside Directors: Evidence from Corporate Governance Reform in Korea, "Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis", 42, ss. 941-962.
• Coles J., Daniel N., Naveen L. (2008), Boards: Does One Size Fit All, "Journal of Financing Economics", 87, ss. 329-356.
• Dahya J., Dimitrov O., McConnell J. (2008), Dominant Shareholders, Corporate Boards, and Corporate Value: A Cross-country analysis, "Journal of Financial Economics", 87, ss. 73-100.
• Dalton D., Daily C., Johnson J. and others (1999), Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, "The Academy of Management Journal", 42, ss. 674-686.
• De Andres P., Azofra V., Lopez F. (2005), Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness, "Corporate Governance: An International Review", 13, ss. 197-210.
• Devos E., Prevost A., Puthenpurackal J. (2009), Are Interlocked Directors Effective Monitors?, "Financial Management", 38, ss. 861-887.
• Dey D., Chauchen Y. (2009), Board Composition and Performance in Indian Firms: A Comparison, "IUP Journal of Corporate Governance", 8, ss. 7-19.
• Dooley P. (1969), The Interlocking Directorate, "The American Economic Review", 59, ss. 314-323.
• Drakos A., Bekiris F. (2010), Endogeneity and the Relationship Between Board Structure and Firm Performance: A Simultaneous Equation Analysis for the Athens Stock Exchange, "Managerial and Decision Economics", 31, ss. 387-401.
• Dwivedi N., Jain A. (2005), Corporate Governance and Performance of Indian Firms: The Effect of Board Size and Ownership, "Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal", 17, ss. 161-172.
• Ehikioya B. (2009), Corporate Governance Structure and Firm Performance in Developing Economies: Evidence from Nigeria, "Corporate Governance", 9, ss. 231-243.
• Eisenberg T., Sundgren S., Wells M. (1998), Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms, "Journal of Financial Economics", 48, ss. 35-54.
• El-Faitouri R. (2014), Bard of Directors and Tobin's Q: Evidence from U.K. Firms, "Journal of Finance and Accounting", 2, ss. 82-99.
• Erickson J., Park Y., Reising J. and others (2005), Board Composition and Firm Value Under Concentrated Ownership: The Canadian Evidence, "Pacific-Basin Finance Journal", 13, ss. 387-410.
• Evans C., Dion K. (1991), Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis, "Small Group Research", 22, ss. 175-186.
• Ferris S., Jagannathan M. (2001), The Incidence and Determinants of Multiple Corporate Directorships, "Applied Economics Letters", 8, ss. 31-35.
• Goilden B., Zając E. (2001), When will Boards Influence Strategy? Inclination x Power = Strategic change, "Strategic Management Journal", 22, ss. 1087-1117.
• Goodstein J., Gautam K., Boekar W. (1994), The Effect of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change, "Strategic Management Journal", 15, ss. 241-250.
• Guest P. (2009), The Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence From the UK, "The European Journal of Finance", 15, ss. 385-404.
• Hermalin B., Weisbach M. (2001), Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institutions: A Survey of Economic Literature, "Economic Policy Review", 9, ss. 7-27.
• Jackling B., Johl S. (2009), Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence form India's Top Companies, "Corporate Governance: An International Review", 17, ss. 492-509.
• Jensen M. (1993), The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and Failure of Internal Control Systems, "Journal of Finance", 48, ss. 831-880.
• Kaczmarek S., Kimino S., Pye A. (2014), Interlocking Directorship and Firm Performance in Highly Regulated Sectors: the Moderating Impact of Board Diversity, "Journal of Management & Governance", 18, ss. 347-372.
• Kiel, Nicholson (2003), Board Compositions and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance, "Corporate Governance - An International Review", 11, ss. 189-205.
• Kota H., Tomar S. (2010), Corporate Governance Practices in Indian Firms, "Journal of Management and Organization", 16, ss. 266-279.
• Kumar N., Singh J. (2013), Effect of Board Size and Promoter Ownership on Firm Value: Some Empirical Findings from India, "Corporate Governance", 13, ss. 88-98.
• Lehn K., Patro S., Zhao M. (2009), Determinants of the Size and Compositions of US Boards: 1935-2000, "Financial Management", 38, ss. 747-780.
• Linck J., Netter J., Yang T. (2008), The Determinants of Board Structure, "Journal of Financial Economics", 87, ss. 308-328.
• Lipton M., Lorsh J. (1992), A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance, "Business Lawyer", 48, ss. 58-77.
• Loderer C., Peyer U. (2002), Board Overlap, Seat Accumulation and Share Prices, "European Financial Management", 8(2), ss. 165-192.
• Mak Y., Kusnadi Y. (2005), Size Really Matters: Further Evidence on the Negative Relationship Between Board Size and Firm Value, "Pacific-Basin Finance Journal", 13, ss. 301-318.
• Mariolis P. (1975), Interlocking Directorates and Control of Corporations: The Theory of Bank Control, "Social Science Quarterly", 56, ss. 425-439.
• Masulis R., Wang C., Xie F. (2012), Globalizing the Boardroom - The Effects of Foreign Directors on Corporate Governance and Firm Performance, "Journal of Accounting and Economics", 53, ss. 527-554.
• McIntyre M., Murphy S., Mitchell P. (2007), The Top Team: Examining Board Composition and Firm Performance, "Corporate Governance", 7, ss. 547-561.
• Mehrotra S. (2016), The Nature of Corporate Board Structure and Its Impact on the Performance of USA Listed Firms, "IUP Journal of Corporate Governance", 15, ss. 30-45.
• Monem R. (2013), Determinants of Board Structure: Evidence from Australia, "Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics", 9, ss. 33-49.
• O'Connell V., Cramer N. (2010), The Relationship Between Firm Performance and Board Characteristics in Ireland, "European Management Journal", 28, ss. 387-399.
• O'Sullivan N. (2000), Managers as Monitors: An Analysis of the Non-Executive Role of Senior Executives Introduction in UK Companies, "British Journal of Management", 11, ss. 17-29.
• Ong C-H, Wan D., Ong K-S. (2003), An Exploratory Study on Interlocking Directorates in Listed Firms in Singapore, "Corporate Governance: An International Review", 11, ss. 322-334.
• Payne G., Benson G., Finegold D. (2009), Corporate Board Attributes, Team Effectiveness and Financial Performance, "Journal of Management Studies", 46, ss. 704-731.
• Pennings J.M. (1980), Interlocking directorates, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Limited.
• Pfeffer J. (1972), Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment, "Administrative Science Quarterly", 17, ss. 218-228.
• Pfeffer J. (1987), A Resource Dependence Perspective on Intercorporate Relations [w:] M.S. Mizruchi, M. Schwartz (red.), Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. (2003/1978), The External Control of Organizations: a Resources Dependence Perspective, Standford, Standford University Press.
• Raja J., Kumar A. (2008), SME Entrepreneurship, Firm Performance, and Corporate Governance Practices in India Service Firms, "Journal of Services Research", 7, ss. 99-113.
• Reddy K., Locke S., Scrimgeour F. (2010), The Efficacy of Principle-based Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Financial Performance: An Empirical Investigation, "International Journal of Managerial Finance", 6, ss. 190-219.
• Rodriguez-Fernandez M., Fernandez-Alonso S., Rodriguez-Rodriguez J. (2014), Board Characteristics and Firm Performance in Spain, "Corporate Governance", 14, ss. 485-503.
• Roy M., Fox M., Hamilton R. (1994), Board Size and Potential Corporate and Director Interlocks in Australasia 1984-1993, "Australian Journal of Management", 19, ss. 201-217.
• Sankowska A., Siudak D. (2015), Empiryczna weryfikacja teorii uzależnienia zasobowego w kontekście usieciowienia rady dyrektorów (interlocking directorates), "Finanse. Rynki Finansowe. Ubezpieczenia", nr 74, t. 1, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin, ss. 661-673.
• Santos R., Silveira A., Barros L. (2012), Board Interlocking in Brazil: Directors' Participation in Multiple Companies and Its Effect on Firm Value and Profitability, "Latin American Business Review", 13, ss. 1-28.
• Siudak D. (2016), Powiązania spółek finansowych z przedsiębiorstwami sfery realnej w sieci rad dyrektorów na polskim rynku kapitałowym, "Studia Ekonomiczne", 2.
• Siudak M. (2001), Zarządzanie wartością przedsiębiorstwa, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa.
• Stening B., Wan T. (1984), Interlocking Directorates Among Australia's Largest 250 Corporations, "Australia and New Zealand Journal of Sociology", 20, ss. 47-55.
• Windolf P. (2008), Corporate Networks in Europe and the United States, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Yang Y., Cai N. (2011), Interlocking Directorates and Firm's Diversification Strategy: Perspective of Strategy learning [in:] M. Dali (ed.), Innovative Computing and Information, Springer - Verlag, Berlin, ss. 87-94.
• Yermack D. (1996), Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors, "Journal of Financial Economics", 40, ss. 185-211.
• Zang X. (1999), Research Note: Personalism and Corporate Networks in Singapore, "Organization Studies", 20, ss. 861-877.