Action Learning in Enhancing the Student Engagement

• Autorzy: Katarzyna Rupik
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper we focus on individual and collective student engagement (at its micro level). We can note that student involvement and empowerment can create opportunities to foster student engagement both in those who take such opportunities up, and in the impact that these students and their work has on other students. Besides, in this paper we concentrate on HEIs activities in enhancing student engagement, so we focus on one of SE sphere: engaging students. Engaging students is about what the staff of HEIs and other parties offer in creating opportunities for students to engage in educationally purposeful ways. (fragment of text)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Edukacja; Szkolnictwo wyższe; Proces uczenia się

EN

Education; Higher education; Learning process

• Czasopismo: Scientific Publications / University of Economics in Katowice
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: New Media in Higher Education Market
• Strony: 73-84

Twórcy

autor

Katarzyna Rupik

• University of Economics in Katowice, Poland

Bibliografia

• Allio R.J. (2011): Henry Mintzberg: Still the zealous skeptic and scold. "Strategy & Leadership", Vol. 39, No. 2.
• Ardley B., Taylor N. (2010): The student practitioner. Developing skills through the marketing research consultancy project. "Marketing Intelligence & Planning", Vol. 28, No. 7.
• Brodie R., Hollebeek L., Jurić B., Ilić A. (2011): Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. "Journal of Service Research", Vol. 14, No. 3.
• Bryson C. (2014): Clarifying the concept of student engagement. In: Understanding and developing student engagement. C. Bryson (ed.). Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.
• Bryson C., Hand L. (2008): An introduction to student engagement. In: SEDA Special 22: Aspects of student engagement. L. Hand, C. Bryson (eds.). Staff and Educational Development Association, London.
• Chickering A.W., Gamson Z.F. (1987): Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. "Washington Center News" Fall.
• Chmielecka E., ed. (2010): Autonomia programowa uczelni. Ramy kwalifikacji dla szkolnictwa wyższego. MNiSW, Warszawa.
• Coates H. (2006): Student engagement in campus based and on-line education. University Connections. Routledge, London.
• European Commission (2012). http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-leaming-policy/ doc44_en.htm (access: 9.06.2012).
• Frank F.D., Finnegan R.P., Taylor C.R. (2004): The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century."Human Resource Planning", Vol. 27 No. 3.
• Healey M., Mason O'Conner K. and Broadfoot P. (2010): Reflections on engaging students in the process and product of strategy development for learning, teaching and assessment: An institutional case study. "International Journal of Academic Development", Vol. 15, No. 1.
• Hollebeek L. (2011): Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus. "Journal of Marketing Management", Vol. 27, No. 7-8.
• Jennings M.K., Stoker L. (2004): Social Trust and civic engagement across time and generations. "Acta Politica", Vol. 39, No. 4.
• Kolb D.A. (1984): Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentince-Hall, New Jersey.
• Krause K. (2005): Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities, Keynote paper presented at the James Cook University Symposium, James Cook University, Townsville, September.
• Kuh G. (2001): Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. "Change", Vol. 33, No. 3.
• London B., Downey G., Mace S. (2007): Psychological theories of educational engagement: A multi-method approach to studying individual engagement and institutional change. "Vanderbilt Law Review", Vol. 60, No. 2.
• Mann S. (2001): Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. "Studies in Higher Education", Vol. 26, No. 1.
• Marquardt M. (2011): Optimizing the power of action learning: Real-Time strategies for developing leaders, building teams and transforming organizations. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Boston-London.
• Marquardt M., Waddill D. (2004): The power of learning in action learning: A conceptual analysis of how the five schools of adult learning theories are incorporated within the practice of action learning. "Action Learning Research and Practice", Vol. 09, No. 1(2).
• Miettinenn R. (2000): The concept of experiential learning and John Deweys's theory of reflective thought and action. "International Journal of Lifelong Education", Vol. 19, No. 1.
• Morgan M. (2008): The importance of 'OUTduction' in the student lifecycle. Paper presented at the Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Association of University Administrators (AUA), 31 March - 2 April, University of York, Heslington, York.
• Morgan M. (2012): The student experience practitioner model, in: Improving the Student Experience. A practical guide for universities and colleges. M. Morgan (ed.). Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.
• Prince M. (2004): Does active learning work? A review of the research. "Journal of Engineering Education", Vol. 93, No. 3.
• Rae D., Wang C.L., eds. (2015): Entrepreneurial learning. New perspectives in research, education and practices. Routledge Abingdon, Oxon.
• Rupik K., Żyminkowski T., Januszewski F. (2013): Entrepreneurial universities in Poland. Searching for best practices. In: Entrepreneurial Universities Conference Proceedings. T. Baaken, M. Neuvonen-Rauhala, T. Davey, M. Lahdeniemi, T. Ahonen, A. Meerman (eds.). May 27-29, Amsterdam.
• Shah M.N., Janardhanan N.S. (2012): Student heterogeneity and leadership training: Designing project management pedagogy for maximum learning impact. "India Journal of Project, Program & Portfolio Management", Vol. 3, No. 2.
• Yeo R.K., Marquardt M.J. (2010): Problems as building blocks for organizational learning: A roadmap for experiential inquiry. "Group Organization Management", Vol. 35, No. 3.
• Zepke N., Leach L. (2010): Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. "Active Learning in Higher Education", Vol. 11, No. 3.