Przewaga konkurencyjna przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych nad ich odpowiednikami nierodzinnymi

• Autorzy: Wojciech Popczyk

Warianty tytułu

The Competitive Advantage of Family Businesses over Their Non-Family Counterparts

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

We współczesnym, niestabilnym, konkurencyjnym otoczeniu firmy rodzinne, które charakteryzuje niechęć do korzystania z dźwigni finansowej oraz do otwierania struktury własności dla inwestorów czy zatrudniania kompetentnych menedżerów spoza rodziny, jak można by przypuszczać, skazane są na marginalizację. Tymczasem firmy rodzinne istnieją, rozwijają się i, co potwierdzają cytowane badania empiryczne przeprowadzone w wielu krajach o różnym poziomie rozwoju gospodarczego i należących do różnych kręgów kulturowych, osiągają nie gorsze, a w większości przypadków lepsze wyniki od swoich odpowiedników nierodzinnych. Źródłem sukcesu firm rodzinnych jest kapitał rodzinny rozumiany jako specyficzna forma kapitału społecznego albo familizm - pokrewna kategoria nawiązująca do szkoły zasobowej. Autor koncentruje się na podejściu szkoły kapitału społecznego z uwagi na jej większe walory praktyczne i aplikacyjne. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

It seems that in the contemporary, unstable, competitive environment family businesses, which are characterized by reluctance to use gearing and to open the property structure to investors, or employing competent managers from outside the family, are doomed to be marginalized. Meanwhile, family companies are developing. As it has been confirmed by empirical research carried out in many countries, differing in the level of economic development and of different cultural spheres, the results they receive are not worse, and in most cases the results are better than the ones achieved by their non-family counterparts. The success source for family companies is the family capital, understood as a specific form of social capital or 'familism' - a cognate category, referring to the school of resources. The author focuses on the approach represented by the school of social capital, due to its greater practical and application values. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Przedsiębiorstwo rodzinne; Przewaga konkurencyjna; Przegląd literatury; Badania porównawcze

EN

Family-owned business; Competitive advantage; Literature review; Comparative examination

• Czasopismo: Problemy Zarządzania
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 8
• Numer: nr 4 (30) Przedsiębiorczość rodzinna
• Strony: 56-72

Twórcy

autor

Wojciech Popczyk

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

Bibliografia

• Ackoff, R.L. 1994. The democratic corporation: A radical prescription for recreating corporate America and rediscovering success, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Adler, P.S. і S.W. Kwon 2000. Social capital: The good, the bad and the ugly, w: E.L. Lesser (red.) Knowledge and social capital, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Adler, P.S. і S.W. Kwon 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, nr 27, s.17-40.
• Allouche, J., Amann, В., Jaussaud, J. і Т. Kurashina 2008. The impact of family control on the performance and financial characteristics of family versus nonfamily businesses in Japan: A matched-pair investigation. Family Business Review, nr 4 (21), s. 315-329.
• Anderson, R.C. і D.M. Reeb 2003. Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, nr 3 (58), s. 1301-1328.
• Aronoff, C.E. i J.L. Ward 1995. Family-owned businesses: A thing of the past or a model of the future? Family Business Review, nr 2 (8), s. 121-130.
• Bourdieu, P. 1985. The Forms of Capital, Wikipedia 2010.
• Business Week 2003. Family Inc. Business Week, November 10, s. 100-114.
• Daily C.M. і M.J. Dollinger 1992. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, nr 2 (5), s. 117-136.
• Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. i L. Donaldson 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, nr 1 (22), s. 20-47.
• Denison, D., Lief, C. i J. Ward 2004. Culture in family-owned enterprises: Recognizing and leveraging unique strengths. Family Business Review, nr 17, s. 61-70.
• Donckels, R. і E. Fröhlich 1991. Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, nr 2 (4), s. 149-160.
• Dyer, W.G. 1986. Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transactions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Frishkoff, P.A. 1995. What is a Family Business? Oregon State University, Austin Family Business Program.
• Gallo, M.A., Tapies, J. і К. Cappuyns 2004. Comparison of family and nonfamily business: Financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review, nr 4 (17), s. 303-318.
• Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M.L. і I.C. Macmillan 2003. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, nr 18, s. 451-465.
• Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M. i R. Sorenson 2006. Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family Business Review, nr 2 (19), s. 135-145.
• James, H. 1999. Owner as manager, extender horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, nr 6, s. 41-56.
• Jaśkiewicz, P. 2005. Family influence and performance: An empirical study for Germany and France, paper presented at the FBN-IFERA Conference, Portland.
• Jaśkiewicz, P. i S. Klein 2005. Family influence and performance - theoretical concepts and empirical results, paper presented at the FERC Conference, Portland.
• Kramer, R.M., Brewer, M.B. і B.A. Hanna 1996. Collective trust and collective action: the decision to trust as a social decision, w: R.M. Kramer і T.M. Tyler (red.) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, s. 357-389. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Lesser, E.L. 2000. Leveraging social capital in organizations, w: E.L. Lesser, Knowledge and social capital, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Levie, J. і M. Lerner 2009. Resource mobilization and performance in family and non- family businesses in the United Kingdom. Family Business Review, nr 1 (22), s. 25-38.
• Lewicki, R.J. і B.B. Bunker 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships, w: R.M. Kramer і T.M. Tyler (red.) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, s. 114-139. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Lumpkin, G.T. і G.G. Dess 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, nr 21, s. 135-172.
• Lyman, A.R. 1991. Customer service: Does family ownership make a difference? Family Business Review, nr 3 (4), s. 303-324.
• Martinez, J.I. 2003. Family business in Chile. Families in Business, nr 11, s. 20-23.
• Martinez, J.I., Stohr, B.S. i B.F. Quiroga 2007. Family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from public companies in Chile. Family Business Review, nr 2 (20), s. 83-94.
• McConaughy, D.L., Walker, M.C., Henderson, G.V. i C.S. Mishra 1995. Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value, paper presented at the European Financial Management Association Meeting.
• Menendez-Requejo, S. 2005. Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Spanish family firms, paper presented at the FBN-IFERA Conference, Brussels.
• Merton, R.K. 1984. Social theory and social structure, New York: Free Press.
• Mikuła, B. 2008. Zarządzanie ludźmi pracującymi dla organizacji opartych na wiedzy, w: J. Stankiewicz (red.) Wiedza - Innowacyjność - Zmiana, s. 41. Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski.
• Moscetello, L. 1990. The Pitcairns want you. Family Business Magazine, February.
• Nahapiet, J. i S. Ghoshal 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, nr 2 (23), s. 242-266.
• Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjoberg, K. і J. Wiklund 2007. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, nr 1 (20), s. 33-47.
• Nonaka, І. і H. Takeuchi 2000. Kreowanie wiedzy w organizacji. Jak spółki japońskie dynamizują procesy innowacyjne, Warszawa: Poltext.
• Pervin, A. 1997. A conversation with Henry Mintzberg. Family Business Review, nr 2 (10), s. 185-198.
• Probst, G., Raub, S. і К. Romhardt 2004. Zarządzanie wiedzą w organizacji, Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.
• Putnam, R.D. 1993. The prosperous community: Social capita! and public life. American Prospect, nr 13, s. 35-42.
• Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R. і R.Y. Nanetti 1995. Demokracja w działaniu : tradycje obywatelskie we współczesnych Włoszech, Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak.
• Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Freese, M. i G.T. Lumpkin 2004. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: Cumulative empirical evidence, paper presented at the 23rd Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Glasgow.
• Rosenblatt, P.C., deMik, L., Anderson, R.M. і P.A. Johnson 1985. The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenges entrepreneurial families face, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H. i R.N. Dino 2003. Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, nr 18, s. 473-491.
• Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N. і A.K. Buchholtz 2001. Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence. Organization Science, nr 2 (12), s. 85-105.
• Stewart, T.A. 1999. Intellectual Capital. The new wealth of organizations, New York: A Currency Book Published by Doubleday.
• Sztaudynger, J.J. 2009. Rodzinny kapitał społeczny a wzrost gospodarczy iv Polsce, Łódź: Katedra Ekonometrii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Tagiuri, R. i J.A. Davis 1996. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, nr 2 (9), s. 199-208.
• Visscher de, F.M., Aronoff, C.F. i J.L. Ward 1995. Financing transitions: Managing capital and liquidity in the family business. Family Business Leadership Series, Marietta: Business Owner Resources.
• Ward, J.L. 1988. The special role of strategic planning for family businesses. Family Business Review, nr 2 (1), s. 105-117.
• Ward, J.L. 1997. Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review, nr 4 (10), s. 323-337.
• Westhead, P. і С. Howorth 2006. Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, nr 4 (19), s. 301-316.
• Whiteside, M.F. i F.H. Brown 1991. Drawbacks of a dual systems approach to family firms: Can we expand our thinking? Family Business Review, nr 4, s. 383-395.
• Zahra, S.A. 2003. International expansion of US. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, nr 18, s. 495-512.
• Zahra, S.A., Hayton, J.C. і С. Salvato 2004. Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, nr 4 (28), s. 363-381.