Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2007 | z. 83 | 121-128
Tytuł artykułu

Privatization of State Enterprises in Russia - What Went Wrong and Why?

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
From the very beginning the way the privatization of Russian economy was carried out aroused huge controversies. Some maintain that it contributed to its criminalization and overtaking of the most important branches by oligarchs and representatives of economic underground. Blatant corruption when some transactions were made and a wide range of privileges that directors and other employees enjoyed when buying the shares of the companies they worked for were the most criticized aspects of the programme. The main social goal of the first privatization programme was distribution of state-owned property and it was based on the principle of social justice and creation of a large and powerful middle class on the basis of private ownership, which was considered a necessary condition for social and political stability. Taking into account the necessity of a thorough restructuring of these companies, the program which favoured giving the ownership rights to employees and prevented outside investors from taking over the companies did not seem to be the best solution. Another problem was that the new owners, still burdened with the experiences they had of the command-and-quota system, were unable to manage enterprises in the situation of emerging market economy. Besides, the Russian model of mass privatization only to a small extent took into account the issues of efficiency, budget revenues and future investments; at the same time it put too much emphasis on often illusory aim to establish the class of small owners. Mass privatization neither brought about the inflow of new investments nor stimulated accumulation of capital. Neither did we witness any considerable improvement in the fields of financial stabilization, economic effectiveness or creating competitive environment(original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
121-128
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie
  • Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie
Bibliografia
  • Black B., Kraakman R., Tarassova A., Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?, "Stanford Law Review", Vol. 52, July 2000.
  • Dolan E. G., When property is theft - market reform in Russia, Reason, Dec. 1998, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1568/is_1998_Dec/ai_53260536
  • Galbraith J. K., Kryzys globalizacji, Dissent, Summer 1999, Vol. 46, No. 3, http://www.uni.wroc.pl/~turowski/galbraith.htm
  • Glinkina S., Grigoriev A., Yakobidze V., Crime and Corruption, w: L. R. Klein, M. Pomer (eds.), The New Russia: Transition Gone Awry, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2001.
  • Jarosz M., Plusy i minusy transformacji, http://www.wspiz.edu.pl/resources/?rid=22992
  • Klebnikov P., Rosja - kradzież stulecia, Multinational Monitor, January 2002, http://www.lewica.pl/?dzial=teksty&id=172
  • Nesterov A., Russian oligarchs were recommended pay more for privatization, "Pravda", 19/04/2004, http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/89/356/12561_oligarch.html
  • Rutland P., Privatisation in Russia: one step forward, two steps back?, Europe - Asia Studies, Nov. 1st 1994, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3955/is_n6_v46/ai_16601751
  • Szul Ł., I etap denacjonalizacji - prywatyzacja czekowa, http://www.rosjapl.info/rosja/gospodarka/prywatyzacja_czekowa.php
  • Szul Ł., II etap prywatyzacji - od roku 1994, http://www.rosjapl.info/rosja/gospodarka/prywatyzacja_2etap.php
  • Vaknin S., Chubais - Russia's Last Oligarch, http://samvak.tripod.com/brief-chubais01.html
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171308667
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.