Hypercompetitive Trends as a Premise to Create Co-opetitive Relations

• Autorzy: Joanna Cygler
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

For a few dozensof years we have observed growing and unpredictable changes ,both, of the environment and rules of the competitors' market game which have created hypercompetition. It is stimulated along with globalisation of sectors and advances in technology, which intensifies competition not only internationally but also in home countries. Profound changes of the environment force companies to constantly redefine their competitive positions and strategies. R.A.D'Aveni indicates the necessity to change competition in four basic areas: price-quality , time and know-how, strongholds and deep-pockets strategies. In the price-cost area companies are forced to run price wars which, eventually, lead to destruction and extinction of the parties of the conflict. In case of time-based strategy speed and originality of the first mover are the key to success. Stronghold strategies are based on setting up barriers to entry in particular sectors and geographical markets. Deep-pockets strategies are founded on developing co-opetitive relationships to outperform bigger and stronger rivals. In the hypercompetitive environment competitive advantages are temporary. The existing concepts related to the development of competitive advantages (e.g.E.M.Porter) are losing their relevance and there is a need to come up with new ideas and instruments. .R.A.D'Aveni puts forward a concept of new 7S taking into account specific aspects of the hypercompetitive environment as a response to a decreasingly relevant McKinsey 7S. New instruments include superior stakeholder satisfaction, strategic soothsaying, speed, surprise, shifting competition rules, signalling strategic intent, and simultaneous and sequential thrusts. Their task is to disrupt the current rules of the game, take over the initiative and implement new rules. Rivalry in the hypercompetitive environment coerces corporations to meet very strict organzational requirements. More and more frequently they decide to cooperate with their rivals by establishing co-opetitive relationships. The latest survey by the EIU shows that the overwhelming majority of companies find such relationships an inevitable necessity of the development in hypercompetitive environments. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Konkurencja rynkowa

EN

Market competition

• Czasopismo: Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów / Szkoła Główna Handlowa
• Rocznik: 2007
• Numer: z. 83
• Strony: 35-48

Twórcy

autor

Joanna Cygler

• Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie

Bibliografia

• Cygler J., Alianse strategiczne, Difin, Warszawa 2002.
• D'Aveni R. A., Gunther R., Hypercompetitive Rivals. Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments, The Free Press, New York 1995.
• Freeman C., The Challenge of New Technologies, in OECD, Interdependence and Co-operation in Tomorrow's World, OECD, Paris 1987.
• Ohmae K., Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy, HarperCollins, New York 1999.
• Porter M. E., Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Press, New York 1985.
• Porter M. E., Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York 1990.
• Quinn J. B., Intelligent Enterprise. A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry, The Free Press, New York 1992.
• Quinn J. B., Minzberg H., Dealing with Structure and Systems, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall 1988.
• World Investment Report. Transnational Corporations and Internationalization of R&D, UNCTAD, New York and Geneva 2005.
• World Investment Report. FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development, UNCTAD, New York and Geneva 2006.
• Bogner W. C., Barr P. S., Making Sense in Hypercompetitive Environments: A Congnitive Explanation for the Persistence of High Velocity Competition, "Organization Science", Vol. 11, No. 2, March-April 2000.
• Cygler J., Kooperencja - nowy typ relacji między konkurentami, "Organizacja i Kierowanie", Nr 2/2007 (in press).
• D'Aveni R. A., Coping with hypercompetition: Utilizing the new 7S's framework, "Academy of Management Executive", Vol. 9, No. 9, 1995.
• D'Aveni R. A., Waking Up to the New Era of Hypercompetition, "The Washington Quarterly", Vol. 21, No. 1, Winter 1998.
• D'Aveni R. A., Strategic Supremacy through Disruption and Dominance, "Sloan Management Review", Vol. 40, No. 3, Spring 1999.
• Feinberg S. E., Gupta A. K., Knowlwdge Spillovers nad the Assigment of R&D Responsibilities to Foreign Subsidiaries, "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 25, 2004.
• Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H., Tang M.-J., Linking Hypercompetition and Strategic Group Theories: Strategic Maneuvering in the US Insurance Industry, "Management and Decision Economics", No. 22, 2001.
• Gummensson E., Collaborate or Compete. Conflicting Trends Plague Services Markets, "Marketing Management", Fall 1997.
• Hanssen-Bauer J., Snow Ch. C., Responding to Hypercompetition: the Structure and Process of Regional Learning Network Organization, "Organization Science", Vol. 7, No. 4, July-August 1996.
• Harvey M., Novicevic M. M., The hypercompetitive global marketplace: the importance of intuition and creativity in expatriate managers, "Journal of World Business", Vol. 37, 2002.
• Harvey M., Novicecic M. M., The impact of hypercompetitive "timescapes" on the development of global mindset, "Management Decision", Vol. 39/6, 2001.
• Harvey M., Novicevic M. M., Kiessling T., Hypercompetition and the Future of Global Management in the Twenty-first Century, "Thunderbird International Business Review", Vol. 43(5), 2001.
• Ilinitch A. Y., D'Aveni R. A., Lewin A. Y., New Organizational Forms and Strategies for Managing in Hypercompetitive Environments, "Organization Science", Vol. 7, No. 3, May-June 1996.
• Kapur V., Peters J., Berman S., High-tech 2005: the horizontal, hypercompetitive future, "Strategy & Leadership", Vol. 31, No. 2, 2003.
• Kummerle W., The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: an empirical investigation, "Journal of International Business Studies", Vol. 30, 1999.
• Makadok R., Can First-Mover and Early-Mover Advantages be Sustained in an Industry with Low Barriers to Entry/Imitation?, "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 19, 1998.
• Moore J. F., Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition, "Harvard Business Review", May-June 1993.
• Parayre R., Hurry D., Corporate Investment and Strategic Stability in Hypercompetition, "Management and Decision Economics", Vol. 22, 2001.
• Rühli E., The Concept of Hipercompetition - a New Approach to Strategic Management in Large Multinational Firms, "Strategic Change", Vol. 6, 1997.
• Thomas III L. G., The Two Faces of Competition, "Organization Science", Vol. 7, No. 3, 1996.
• Wiggins R., Ruefli T. W., Schumpeter's Ghost: is Hypercompetition Making the Best of Times Shorter?, "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 26, 2005.
• Volberda H. W., Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercom-petitive Environments, "Organization Science", Vol. 7, No. 4, July-August 1996.
• www.eiu.com