The Construction of Well-Being Indicators: from Definitions to Measures and to Interpretation

• Autorzy: Filomena Maggino

Warianty tytułu

Konstrukcja wskaźników dobrobytu: od definicji do pomiaru i interpretacji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Pomiar i monitorowanie postępu i dobrobytu krajowego wymaga przeprowadzenia ściśle określonych etapów: od definicji, przez pomiar, do interpretacji. Proces realizacji tych etapów polega głównie na konceptualizacji, czyli określeniu niezbędnych pojęć wraz z dziedzinami, których te pojęcia dotyczą. Ważna jest odpowiednia interpretacja wyników pomiaru, którą mogą wspomóc odpowiednie modele eksploracyjne. Celem tego artykułu jest całościowe omówienie zagadnienia wraz z wyjaśnieniem podstawowych pojęć, takich jak: jakość życia, sprawiedliwość, trwały rozwój.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

In order to measure and monitor a country's well-being and progress, a particular path has to be followed, leading from concept to measure, to interpretation. The process requires: (a) defining the concepts to measure and monitor and their conceptual dimensions, together with the ambits (domains) in which the concepts are observed and monitored; (b) developing/selecting indicators; this requires the identification also of the appropriate techniques aimed at their synthesis; (c) defining the perspectives through which the indicators should be observed and the consistent organization of the monitoring process; (d) defining the interpretative/explanatory models, which actually link the obtained results to the previously defined concept. The widely accepted main concepts defining the progress of a country (or community) are the well-being of individuals (quality of life), its fair distribution (equity), and sustainable promotion (sustainability). The paper aims at (a) clarifying different issues concerning the well-being of societies by providing a conceptual instrument allowing anyone to orient themselves among all the emerging proposals and to distinguish between serious and propagandistic ones; (b) unravelling the primary methodological aspects and issues that should be considered in constructing indicators. Keywords: measurement of national well-being, well-being concepts, indicators' definition and construction.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Jakość życia; Pomiary; Wskaźnik trwałego dobrobytu ekonomicznego; Dobrobyt; Dobrostan

EN

Quality of life; Measurement; Index od Sustatainable Economic Welfare (ISEW); Prosperity; Well-being

• Czasopismo: Śląski Przegląd Statystyczny
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: nr 11 (17)
• Strony: 95-122

Twórcy

autor

Filomena Maggino

• Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy

Bibliografia

• Berger-Schmitt R., Noll H.-H., Conceptual Framework and Structure of a European System of Social Indicators, EuReporting Working Paper No. 9, Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA) - Social Indicators Department, Mannheim 2000.
• Diener E., Suh E., Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators, "Social Indicators Research" 1997, Vol. 40, pp. 189-216.
• Eurostat, Definition of quality in statistics and Standard quality report, 2000.
• Felce D., Perry J., Quality of Life: Its Definition and Measurement, "Research in Developmental Disabilities" 1995, 16 (1), pp. 51-74.
• Horn R.V., Statistical Indicators, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.
• Johansson S., Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life for National Policy, "Social Indicators Research" 2002, 58, pp. 13-32.
• Maggino F., The State of the Art in Indicators Construction in the Perspective of a Comprehensive Approach in Measuring Well-Being of Societies, Firenze University Press, Archivio E-Prints, Firenze 2009.
• Maggino F., Ruviglioni E., Preaching to the Choir: Are the commission's recommendations already applied?, "Social Indicators Research" 2011, Vol. 102, Issue 1, pp. 131-156.
• Nuvolati G., Uno specifico settore di applicazione degli indicatori sociali: La qualità della vita, [in:] F. Zajczyk, Il mondo degli indicatori sociali, una guida alla ricerca sulla qualità della vita, La Nuova Italia Scientifica , Roma 1997, pp. 69-94.
• Patel S., Hiraga M., Wang L. (World Bank), D. Drew, a D. Lynd (UNESCO), A Framework for Assessing the Quality of Education Statistics, World Bank - Development Data Group and UNESCO - Institute for Statistics 2003.
• Sirgy M.J., Theoretical Perspectives Guiding QoL Indicators Project, "Social Indicators Research" 2011, Vol. 103, pp. 1-22.
• Sirgy M.J., A.C. Michalos, A.L. Ferriss, R.A. Easterlin, D. Patrick, W. Pavot, The Quality- of-Life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future, "Social Indicators Research" 2006, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 343-466.
• Śleszyński J., Prospects for synthetic sustainable development indicators, paper presented at the conference "Quality of Life and Sustainable Development", September 20-21, Wroclaw 2012.
• Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, J.E. Stiglitz, A. Sen, J.-P. Fitoussi (eds.), Paris 2009, http://www.stiglitzsen- fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm.
• Zapf W., Individuelle Wohlfahrt: Lebensbedingungen und Wahrgenommene Lebensqualität, [in:] Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik, W. Glatzere, W. Zapf (eds.), Frankfurt a. M. - New York, Campus 1984, pp. 13-26.
• Zapf W., Le système d'indicateurs sociaux: approches et problèmes, "Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales" 1975, Vol. XXVII, No. 3.