The efficiency of polycentric development strategies in the context of economic crisis. Case study - the development of Southwest Oltenia region - Romania

• Autorzy: Daniel Peptenatu , Radu Pintilii , Cristian Draghici , Alina Peptenatu
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Romania's polycentric development model was elaborated by the Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Researches on Territorial Dynamics within the University of Bucharest and by Urbanproiect SA. The elaboration of the polycentric development strategy is based on the human settlements' classification depending on their polarisation capacity and the designing of a polycentric network, able to ensure the territorial complexity necessary to the attenuation of negative impulses from the suprasystems' level. The world economic crisis may be considered the most powerful negative impulse after the Second World War, generating major disfunctionalities at the level of fragile territorial systems. The elaboration of some specific strategies, able to take into account the new challenges given by the global world, is an important preoccupation of the decision factors in order to increase territorial competitiveness.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Romania; polycentric development; economic crisis; territorial disparities; territorial cohesion; territorial dynamic; territorial management

• Wydawca: Sciendo
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 17
• Numer: 17
• Strony: 117-125

Daty

wydano

2012-01-01

online

2012-06-04

Twórcy

autor

Daniel Peptenatu

• The Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Researches on Territorial Dynamics, University of Bucharest, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Blvd, Sector 3, 030018 Bucharest, Romania

autor

Radu Pintilii

• The Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Researches on Territorial Dynamics, University of Bucharest, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Blvd, Sector 3, 030018 Bucharest, Romania

autor

Cristian Draghici

• The Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Researches on Territorial Dynamics, University of Bucharest, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Blvd, Sector 3, 030018 Bucharest, Romania

autor

Alina Peptenatu

• The Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Researches on Territorial Dynamics, University of Bucharest, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Blvd, Sector 3, 030018 Bucharest, Romania

Bibliografia

• Audretsch, D. B. and Keilbach, M. 2004: Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. In: Regional Studies, 38, 8, pp. 949-959.[Crossref]
• Batten, D. F. 1995: Network cities: creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. In: Urban Studies, 32, pp. 313-327.[Crossref]
• Braghină, C., Drăghici, C., Peptenatu, D. and Pintilii, R. 2008: Rural changes in restructuring mining areas within Gorj county. In: Analele Universitati Valahia din Targoviste, Seria Geografie, T. 8, pp. 151-158.
• Braghină, C., Peptenatu, D. and Drăghici, C. C. 2009: The reorganization of economic activities and the perspectives of the endogenos developement in the mining areas from Gorj county. In: Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 85-93.
• Braghină, C., Peptenatu, D., Constantinescu, Ş., Pintilii, R. D. and Drăghici, C. C. 2010: The pressure exerted on the natural environment in the open pit exploitation areas in Oltenia. In: Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 5, No. 1, pp. 33-40.
• Camagni, R. 1993: From city hierarchy to city networks: reflections about an emerging paradigm. In: Lakshmanan, T. R. and Nijkamp, P. editors, Structure and change in the Space Economy: Festschrift in honour of Martin Beckmann, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 66-87.
• Camagni, R. and Salone, C. 1993: Network urban structures in Northern Italy: elements for a theoretical framework. In: Urban Studies, 30, pp. 1053-1064.[Crossref]
• Capello, R. 2000: The city network paradigm: measuring urban network externalities. In: Urban Studies, 37, pp. 1925-1945.[Crossref]
• Carree, M. A. and Thurik, A. R. 2003: The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In: Audretsch, D. B. and Acs, Z. J. editors, Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 437-471.
• Evans, D. S. and Leighton, L. S. 1989: Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. In: American Economic Review, 79, 3, pp. 519-535.
• Grilo, I. and Thurik, A. R. 2008: Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the US. In: Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 6, pp. 1113-1145.[WoS][Crossref]
• Haindl, G. and Hirschler, P. 2008: Metropolitan development and strategic positioning-planning efforts in selected cities on different levels, REAL CORP 008 Proceedings/Tagungsband, Vienna, May 19-21, 2008.
• Hallgeir, A. 2004: Europa policéntrica: utopía o posibilidad? In: Romero, J. and Farinós, J. editors, Ordenación del territorio y desarrollo territorial: el gobierno del territorio en Europa: tradiciones, contextos, culturas y nuevas visiones, Gijón: Ediciones Trea, pp. 145-170.
• Hołowiecka, B. and Szymańska, D. 2008: The changes in the functional urban region in the new socio-economic conditions in Poland. The case of Toruń. In: Szymańska, D. and Grzelak-Kostulska, E. editors, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, No. 9, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, pp. 63-78.
• Ianoş, I., Peptenatu, D. and Zamfir, D. 2009: Respect for environment and sustainable development. In: Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 4, 1, pp. 81-93.
• Kloosterman, R. C. and Musterd, S. 2001: The polycentric urban region: towards a research agenda. In: Urban Studies, 38, pp. 623-633.[WoS][Crossref]
• Lambooy, J. G. 1969: City and city region in the perspective of hierarchy and complementarity. In: Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 60, pp.141-154.
• Meijers, E. 2005: Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts? In: Urban Studies, 42, pp. 765-781.[Crossref]
• Meijers, E. 2006: Polycentricity and the support for cultural, leisure and sports amenities, paper presented at the First Bi-annual EURA Conference ‘Cities in City Regions’, May 11-14, 2006, Warsaw.
• Parr, J. B. 2004: The polycentric urban region: a closer inspection. In: Regional Studies, 38, pp. 231-240.[Crossref]
• Peptenatu, D., Drăghici, C. C. and Pintilii, R. D. 2006: Considerations theoretiques regardant le management teritorial fonde sur la theorie des poles de croissance. In: Lucrările Seminarului International de Gestiune a Oraselor, M'Sila, Algeria.
• Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R. D., Cepoiu, L. and Drăghici, C. C. 2009a: Polycentric development strategy - an efficient instrument in administrative decentralization. In: Romanian Review on Political Geography, 2, 2, pp. 99-111.
• Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R., Drăghici, C. C. and Stoian, D. 2009b: Accentuarea disparitatilor teritoriale din Romania in conditiile crizei economice mondiale. In: GeoPolitica - Revista de Geografie Politica, GeoPolitica si GeoStrategie, Anul VII, Nr 29, 1, Edit. Top Form, pp.165-172.
• Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R. D., Drăghici, C. C. and Stoian, D. 2009c: Territorial disparities concerning the distribution of the tourist services quality in Romania. In: GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, Year 2, No. 2, Vol. 4, pp. 105-117.
• Reynolds, P. D. 1997: Who starts new firms? - Preliminary explorations of firms-in-gestation. In: Small Business Economics, 9, 5, pp. 449-462.[Crossref]
• Rotefoss, B. and Kolvereid, L. 2005: Aspiring, nascent and fledgling entrepreneurs: an investigation of the business start-up process. In: Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17, 2, pp. 109-127.
• Szymańska, D. 2000: The scale of impact exerted by Bydgoszcz and Toruń in the scope of pernament migration and its role in the suburbanization process. In: Szymańska, D., Frantczak, E. and Nowak, L. editors, Polish Population Review, No. 17, Warszawa: Polish Demographic Society - Central Statistical Office, pp. 128-136.
• Szymańska, D. and Biegańska, J. 2008: The Eastern and the Western Cuiavia - one region, two development lines. In: Szymańska, D. and Hołowiecka, B. editors, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, No. 10, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, pp. 75-83.
• Szymańska, D. and Matczak, A. 2002: Urbanisation in Poland: tendencies and transformation. In: European Urban and Regional Studies, 9, 1, London: Copyright SAGE Publications, CA and New Delhi: Thousand Oaks, pp. 39-46.
• Szymańska, D., Murawska-Środa, S. and Biegańska, J. 2008: Germany - two demographically different states? In: Szymańska, D. and Hołowiecka, B. editors, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, No. 10, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, pp. 85-91.
• Trullén, J. and Boix, R. 2005: Knowledge, networks of cities and growth in regional urban systems, Working Paper 05.04 Departament d'Economia Aplicada, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
• Ullman, E. L. 1956: The role of transportation and the bases for interaction. In: Thomas, W. L. editor, Man's role in changing the face of Earth, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 862-880.
• Zonneveld, W. and Verwest, F. 2005: Tussen droom en retoriek. De conceptualisering van ruimte in de Nederlandse planning, Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10089-012-0012-6