Pro Bono Work vs. Legal Aid: Approaches to Ensuring Access to Justice and the Social Responsibility of the Attorney

• Autorzy: Edita Gruodytė , Stefan Kirchner
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In many jurisdictions middle- and low-income individuals obtain only a relatively modest share of lawyers’ services. In a society ruled by law, every person should be able to expect key principles of justice to apply. Among the most important dimensions of a right to a fair trial is the right to equal access to an attorney. After all, the attorney is not merely a commercial actor but also represents the legal system. Access to an attorney is a key step in providing justice in practice. Many states have developed programs of legal aid which aim at providing those who are in need of legal assistance but cannot afford to pay for legal services with a way to receive legal services. Scientific literature distinguishes various forms and instruments of legal aid: the court appointment of lawyers, free or low cost legal aid provided by public agencies and charitable and fraternal organizations, sometimes mixed with legal expenses insurance, contingency fee and the free services of lawyers who are serving probono publico. From the perspective of practicing attorneys, this article presents and compares existing systems of legal assistance in Lithuania and Germany, and their availability and effectiveness, in order to answer the question whether the social responsibility of attorneys and access to justice is obtained.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Pro bono work; legal aid; attorney; social responsibility; justice

• Wydawca: Sciendo
• Czasopismo: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 5
• Numer: 2
• Strony: 43-64

Daty

wydano

2012-12-01

online

2013-02-08

Twórcy

autor

Edita Gruodytė

• Faculty of Law, Vytautas Magnus University, (Kaunas, Lithuania), Ozeskienės str. 18, Kaunas 44254, Lithuania,

autor

Stefan Kirchner

• Faculty of Law, Vytautas Magnus University, (Kaunas, Lithuania), Ozeskienės str. 18, Kaunas 44254, Lithuania,

Bibliografia

• 1. Ataskaita apie antrinės teisinės pagalbos organizavimą ir teikimą 2011 metais(Report about the Organization and Provision of Secondary Legal Aid in 2011). The Ministry of Justice (2012) // http://www.teisinepagalba.lt/dok/2011%20ANTRINES%20ataskaitafinal%202012-06.pdf.
• 2. Bartkus, Gediminas. “Advokatų pajamos: mitai ir realybė” (Attorneys’ Income: Myths and Reality) (January 12, 2012) // http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/law/gbartkus-advokatu-pajamos-mitai-irrealybe.d?id=53935043.
• 3. Beratungshilfegesetz (Legal Aid Law). Bundesgesetzblatt (Federal Gazette), 1980, Vol. I, pp. 689 et seq.
• 4. Beratungshilfestatistik 2002. Bundesministerium der Justiz (German Federal Ministry of Justice) (November 17, 2011) // http://www.bmj.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/pdfs/Beratungshilfestatistik2002.pdf.
• 5. BerufsordnungfürRechtsanwälte (Rules of Professional Practice for Attorneys) // http://www.brak.de/w/files/02_fuer_anwaelte/berufsrecht/bora_stand_01.11.11.pdf.
• 6. BerufsordnungfürRechtsanwälte (Rules of Professional Practice for Attorneys). English translation // http://www.brak.de/w/files/02_fuer_anwaelte/berufsrecht/bora_engl_stand_1_11_2011.pdf.
• 7. Boon, Andrew, and Robert Abbey. “Moral Agendas? Pro Bono Publico in Large Law Firms in the United Kingdom.” The Modern Law Review Limited (1997): 630-654.
• 8. Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung (Federal Attorneys Law). Bundesgesetzblatt (Federal Gazette), 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565 et seq. // http://www.gesetze-iminternet.de/bundesrecht/brao/gesamt.pdf.
• 9. Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1992, no. 33-1014.
• 10. De Vitto, Scott. “Justice and the Felonious Attorney.” Santa Clara Law Review 155 (2008): 155-179.
• 11. Krolienė, Ingrida. “Valstybės garantuojama teisinė pagalba kaip teisės į teisinę gynybą užtikrinimo priemonė. Teisė į teisminę gynybą civilinio proceso reformos kontekste” (State guaranteed legal aid as a mean of right to the judicial defense. The right to judicial protection in the context of the reform of civil procedure): 116-135. In: Collection of Scientific Articles. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universiteto Leidybos centras, 2010.
• 12. Law on State-Guaranteed Legal Aid of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 30-827.
• 13. Law on the Bar of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2004, no. 50-1632.
• 14. Order by the Minister of Justice No. 1R-105 “For Establishing StateGuaranteed Legal Aid Services and for Reorganization of Public InstitutionsVilnius Public Attorney and Šiauliai Public Attorney Offices.” Official Gazette, 2005, no. 47-1577.
• 15. Order by the Minister of Justice No. 1R-345 “For Publishing Lithuanian Code ofEthics for Advocates.” Official Gazette, 2005, no. 130-4681.
• 16. Order by the Minister of Justice No. 1R-347 “For the Establishment of theBoard structure and regulations of the State Guaranteed Legal Aid.” Official Gazette, 2008, no. 104-4005.
• 17. Order by the Minister of Justice No. 1R-99 “For the Establishment of theNumber of Attorneys Continuously Providing Secondary Legal Aid.” Official Gazette, 2006, no. 35-1265; 2007, no. 78- 3163.
• 18. “Profesija ta pati: darbas ir atlyginimas kitokie” (Profession the same: work and income different). Veidas (March 20, 2012) // http://www.veidas.lt/profesija-ta-pati-darbas-ir-atlyginimas-%E2%80%93-kitokie.
• 19. Regan, Francis. “The Swedish Legal Services Policy Remix: The Shift from Public Legal Aid to Private Legal Expense Insurance.” Journal of Law andSociety Vol. 30, No. 1 (March 2003): 49-65.
• 20. Samuolytė, Jolanta, Jolanta Aleknavičienė, and Regina Valutytė. Valstybėsgarantuojamos teisinės pagalbos prieinamumas: pirminė ir antrinė teisinėpagalba (Availability of state guaranteed legal aid: primary and secondarylegal aid). Vilnius: Human Rights Monitoring Institute, 2011 // http://www.hrmi.lt/uploaded/TYRIMAI/VGTP_tyrimas_20111216_FINAL.pdf.
• 21. Samuolytė, Jolanta. “Pro bono Lietuvoje: iššūkiai ir galimybės” (Pro bono in Lithuania: challenges and opportunities). Konferencija Teisingumas Lietuvoje:teisė ar privilegija? (Conference Justice in Lithuania: Right or Privilege?). Vilnius (December 16, 2011) // http://www.hrmi.lt/uploaded/PDF%20dokai/Pro%20bono%20Lietuvoje.pdf.
• 22. Sommerlad, Hilary. “Some Reflections on Relationship between Citizenship, Access to Justice and the Reform of Legal Aid.” Journal of Law and Society Vol. 31, No. 3 (September 2004): 345-68.
• 23. Šimašius, Remigijus. “Protinga teisinė pagalba neturtingam žmogui” (Prudent legal aid for a poor person) (June 1, 2012) // http://simasius.popo.lt/2012/06/01/protinga-teisine-pagalba-neturtingamzmogui.
• 24. The CCBE’s Code of Conduct for European Lawyers // http://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/NTCdocument/EN_Code_of_conductp1_1306748215.pdf.
• 25. Thiemann, Jason M. “The Past, The Present and the Future of Pro Bono: ProBono as a Tax Incentive for Lawyers, not a Tax on the Practice of Law.” Hamline Journal Public Law and Policy Vol. 26 (2004-2005): 331-384.
• 26. Velthoven, Ben C.J. von, and Carolien M. Klein Haarhuis. “Legal Aid and Legal Expenses Insurance, Complements or Substitutes? The Case of the Netherlands.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Vol. 8, No. 3 (2011): 587-612.
• 27. “Žmonėms reikia daugiau informacijos apie teisinė spagalbos gavimo galimybes” (People need more information about the possibility to obtain legal aid” (December 20, 2011) // http://www.tsajunga.lt/index.php/zmonems_reikia_daugiau_informacijos_apie_teisines_pagalbos_gavimo_galimybes/10050.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10076-012-0010-2