Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation

• Autorzy: Jesús Fernández-Domínguez
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Corpus linguistics; lexicalization; morphology; productivity

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 46
• Numer: 2
• Strony: 193-219

Daty

wydano

2010-06-01

online

2010-07-29

Twórcy

autor

Jesús Fernández-Domínguez

• University of Jaén

Bibliografia

• Allan, K. 2006. "Lexicon: Structure". In: Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier. Vol. 7, 148-151.
• Anshen, F. and M. Aronoff. 1981. "Morphological productivity and phonological transparency". Canadian Journal of Linguistics 26. 63-72.
• Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Aronoff, M. 1983. "Potential words, actual words, productivity and frequency". Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists, Tokyo. 163-171.
• Aronoff, M. and F. Anshen. 2001. "Morphology and the lexicon: Lexicalization and productivity". In: Spencer, A. and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 237-247.
• Baayen, R. H. 2005. "Morphological productivity". In: Köhler, R., G. Altmann and R. G. Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 243-255.
• Baayen, R. H. and R. Lieber. 1991. "Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study". Linguistics 29. 801-844.
• Bakken, K. 2006. "Lexicalization". In: Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier. Vol. 7, 106-108.
• Bauer, L. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bauer, L. 1998. "When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? " English Language and Linguistics 2. 65-86.
• Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bauer, L. 2004. "Adjectives, compounds and words". Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1). 7-22.
• Bauer, L. 2005. "Productivity: Theories". In: SKtekauer, P. and R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 64). Dordrecht: Springer. 315-334.
• Bauer, L. and R. Huddleston. 2002. "Lexical word-formation". In: Huddleston, R. and G. K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1621-1721.
• Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Brinton, L. J. and E. C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 1992. Current morphology. London: Routledge.
• Chomsky, N. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. Den Haag: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Copestake, A. 2001. "The semi-generative lexicon: Limits on lexical productivity". In: Bouillon, P. and K. Kanzaki (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, 15-24. <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~aac10/papers/glex2001.pdf> (Last accessed 12 November 2009.)
• Corbin, D. 1987. Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Dal, G. 2003. "Productivité morphologique: Définitions et notions connexes". Lange Frančaise 140. 3-23.
• De Jong, N. H., R. Schreuder and R. H. Baayen. 2000. "The morphological family size effect and morphology". Language and Cognitive Processes 15. 329-365.
• Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Dokulil, M. 1962. Tvoření slov v česKtině 1. Teorie odvozování slov. Praha: ČAV Praha.
• Downing, P. 1977. "On the creation and use of English compound nouns". Language 53(4). 810-842.[Crossref]
• Dressler, W. U. 2003. "Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology". Rivista di Lingüística 15(1). 31-62.
• Dressler, W. U. 2007. "Productivity in word-formation". In: Jarema, G. and G. Libben (eds.), The mental lexicon. Core perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 159-183.
• Fernández-Domínguez, J. 2008. Productivity measurement of English compounding based on a corpus of the nominal type. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Jaén.)
• Fernández-Domínguez, J. 2009. Productivity in word-formation. An approach to N+N compounding. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Fernández-Domínguez, J., A. Díaz-Negrillo and P. SKtekauer. 2007. "How is low morphological productivity measured?" Atlantis 29. 29-54.
• Giegerich, H. J. 2005. "Lexicalism and modular overlap in English". SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2). 571-591. <http://www.pulib.sk/skase/Volumes/JTL03/06.pdf> (Last accessed 3 September 2009.)
• Giegerich, H. J. 2009. "The English compound stress myth".
• Hay, J. 2003. Causes and consequences of word structure. London: Routledge.
• Hay, J. and R. H. Baayen. 2005. "Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology". Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(7). 342-348.
• Hohenhaus, P. 2005. "Lexicalization and institutionalization". In: SKtekauer, P. and R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 64). Dordrecht: Springer. 353-373.
• Jackendoff, R. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kastovsky, D. 1986. "The problem of productivity in word-formation". Linguistics 24. 585-600.
• Kuperman, V., R. Bertram and R. H. Baayen. 2008. "Morphological dynamics in compound processing". Language and Cognitive Processes 23. 1089-1132.
• Lees, R. B. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Levi, J. N. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.
• Li, C. 1971. Semantics and the structure of compounds in Chinese. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.)
• Lieber, R. 2009. "IE, Germanic: English". In: Lieber, R. and P. SKtekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 357-369.
• Lieber, R. and P. SKtekauer. 2009. "Introduction: Status and definition of compounding". In: Lieber, R. and P. SKtekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3-18.
• Lipka, L. 1977. "Lexikalisierung, Idiomatisierung und Hypostasierung als Probleme einer synchronischen Wortbildungslehre". In: Brekle, H. E. and D. Kastovsky (eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung. Bonn: Bouvier. 155-164.
• Lipka, L. 2002. English lexicology: Lexical structure, word semantics and word-formation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
• Marcus, G., M. Ullman, S. Pinker, M. Hollander, T. J. Rosen and F. Xu. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57.)
• Namer, F. 2003. "Productivité morphologique, représentativité et complexité de la base: Le Système MoQuěte". Langue Frančaise 140. 79-101.
• Neuhaus, H. J. 1973. "Zur Theorie der Produktivität von Wortbildungssystemen". In: Ten Cate, A. P. and P. Jordens (eds.), Linguistische Perspektiven: Referate des VII Linguistischen Kolloquiums. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 305-317.
• Nishiwaka, M. 2003. "Lexicon and cognition. A study of listed syntactic objects". The Humanities 52. 29-39.
• Pinker, S. 1991. "Rules of language". Science 253. 530-535.
• Pinker, S. and A. Prince. 1988. "On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition". Cognition 28. 73-193.
• Plag, I. 1999. Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Plag, I. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Plag, I. 2006. "Productivity". In: Aarts, B. and A. McMahon (eds.), Handbook of English linguistics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 537-556.
• Plag, I. and R. H. Baayen. 2009. "Suffix ordering and morphological processing". Language 85. 109-152.
• Plag, I., G. Kunter, S. Arndt-Lappe and M. Braun. 2006. "Modeling compound stress in English".
• Riehemann, S. Z. 1998. "Type-based derivational morphology". Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2. 49-77.
• Romaine, S. 1983. "On the productivity of word formation rules and limits of variability in the lexicon". Australian Journal of Linguistics 3. 177-200.
• Rose, J. H. 1973. "Principled limitations on productivity in denominal verbs". Foundations of Language 10. 509-526.
• Rumelhart, D. E. and J. L. McClelland. 1987. "Learning the past tenses of English verbs: Implicit rules of parallel distributed processing". In: MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 194-248.
• Sauer, H. 2004. "Lexicalization and demotivation". In: Booij, G. E.,C. Lehmann, J. Mudgan and S. Skopeteas (eds.), Morphologie. Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. An international handbook on inflection and word-formation. 2. Halbband. (Volume 2.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1625-1636.
• Schultink, H. 1961. "Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen". Forum der Letteren 2. 110-125.
• Scott, M. 2004. Oxford WordSmith Tools, version 4.0.0.376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Selkirk, E. O. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Simpson, J. A. (ed.). 2002. The Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM, version 3.1 (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• SKtekauer, P. 2000. English word-formation. A history of research (1960-1995). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
• SKtekauer, P. 2001. "Fundamental principles of an onomasiological theory of English word-formation". Onomasiology Online 2. 1-42. <http://www.ku-eichstaett.de/SLF/EngluVglSW/stekauer1011.pdf> (Last accessed 1 April 2010.)
• SKtekauer, P. 2005. Meaning predictability in word-formation: Novel, context-free naming units. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Stepanova, M. D. 1973. Methoden der synchronen Wortschatzanalyse. München: Max Hüber.
• van Marle, J. 1985. On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.
• Verspoor, C. M. 1998. "Predictivity vs. stipulativity in the lexicon". In: Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation, Singapore. 152-162.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x