Preduzetničko Okruženje i Konkurentnost u Bih i Srbiji / Business Environment and Competitiveness in Bih and Serbia

• Autorzy: Jelena Mićić , Marko Šarčević
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

HR

Bosna i Hercegovina zajedno sa Srbijom pokazuje lošije ekonomske performanse od susjednih zemalja, dok evropski prosjek ostaje daleka i umnogome nedostižna kategorija. Razlozi ovakvog nezadovoljavajućeg stanja su mnogi, i ovim radom se želi osvijetliti preduzetnički aspekt ekonomske dinamike ovih zemalja u poređenju sa svjetskim, evropskim i regionalnim prosjekom. Koristićemo komparativnu, statističku, dinamičku i kognitivnu analizu i sintezu u cilju jasnijeg sagledavanja uzroka situacije u kojoj se nalazimo, kao i uočavanja potencijalnih komparativnih prednosti. Kroz predstavljanje pozicija BiH i Srbije u izvještajima Svjetskog ekonomskog foruma u odnosu na ponderisane prosjeke svijeta, Evrope i regiona, preko analize osnovnih parametara konkurentnosti i detaljne analize indikatora preduzetništva doći ćemo do značajnih zaključaka o najvažnijim manjkavostima i mogućim prednostima preduzetništva u BiH i Srbiji. Ove rezultate bi trebalo imati na umu prilikom kreiranja budućih ekonomskih mjera uz značajnu upotrebnu vrijednost sadašnjim i budućim preduzetnicima.

EN

Bosnia and Herzegovina together with Serbia shows the poor economic performance compared to neighbor countries, while the European average remains a remote and largely unattainable category. The reasons for this unsatisfactory situation are many, and this paper aims to highlight the entrepreneurial aspect of the economic dynamics of these countries compared to the world, European and regional average. We will use comparative, statistical, dynamical and cognitive analysis and synthesis in order to get better insight into the causes of our current situation, as well as recognizing the potential comparative advantages. Through presentation of the BiH and Serbia position in the Reports of the World Economic Forum in relation to the weighted averages of the world, Europe and the region, and further through the analysis of the basic parameters of competitiveness and detailed analysis of business environment indicators we will reach important conclusions about the most important shortcomings and potential advantages of entrepreneurship in BiH and Serbia. These results should be kept in mind while creating future economic measures, and they have considerable usable value for current and future entrepreneurs.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

entrepreneurship; competitiveness; productivity; business environment; indicators of competitiveness

HR

preduzetništvo; konkurentnost; produktivnost; preduzetničko okruženje; indikatori konkurentnosti

• Wydawca: Sciendo
• Czasopismo: ECONOMICS
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 3
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 5-20

Daty

wydano

2015-06-01

online

2015-07-11

Twórcy

autor

Jelena Mićić

• Pale, Bosna i Hercegovina
• Pale, Bosnia and Herzegovina

autor

Marko Šarčević

• Univerzitet u Istočnom Sarajevu, Ekonomski fakultet Pale, Bosna i Hercegovina
• University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Economy Pale, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bibliografia

• Deakins, D. i Freel, M. (2012). Entrepreneurship and small firms. Beograd: Data status.
• Macura, R. (2008). Models of entrepreneurial organization. Univerzitet za poslovni inženjering i menadžment Banja Luka.
• Naučno društvo ekonomista Srbije. (2010). How to increase the competitiveness of the economy and exports Serbia. Ekonomski fakultet u Beogradu.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
• Porter, M. E. (2007). Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007. Oxford University Press New York.
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Scholl Press Boston.
• Todorović, J. i Đuranović, D. (2005). Identifying competitive ability as a component of the appraisal company. Finansijsko-računovodstvena profesija u reformi poreskog sistema, 2005, str. 243-256.
• Vukmirović, N. (2006). Modern enterprise. Ekonomski fakultet Banja Luka.
• World Economic Forum. (2014). Global Competitiveness Report 2013-14. Retrived September 30, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf
• World Economic Forum. (2013). Global Competitiveness Report 2013-14. Retrived January 14, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf
• World Economic Forum. (2012). Competitiveness Report 2012-13. Retrived January 14, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2012-13.pdf
• World Economic Forum. (2011). Competitiveness Report 2011-12. Retrived January 14, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdfpreuzeto (14.01.2013)
• World Economic Forum. (2010). Competitiveness Report 2010-11. Retrived September 18, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf
• World Economic Forum. (2009). Competitiveness Report 2009-10. Retrived September 18, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2009-10.pdf
• World Economic Forum. (2008). Competitiveness Report 2008-109. Retrived September 18, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2008-09.pdf
• World Economic Forum. (2007). Competitiveness Report 2007-08. Retrived September 18, 2013. from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2007-08.pdf

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/eoik-2015-0010