Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This paper presents a potential monetary assessment of natural habitats based on a method worked out in 2003 in the Czech Republic. The assessment was prepared for the reclaimed flooded mining pit in Suszec. The analysis was focused on three variants of real and potential habitats from the reclaimed land. Natural values of the flooded mining pit have undergone changes due to afforestation reclamation activities. It has been calculated that the value of natural habitats expressed in numbers will decrease by 70.7% in comparison to the area prior to reclamation, whereas the monetary value of the natural habitats will decrease by 10,319,519.00 PLN. An important element of the assessment includes recognition, diagnosis and evaluation of the actual state of natural habitats by preparing a detailed inventory and determining the most valuable species of plants and animals as well as landscape values. Unfortunately, at present in Poland there is no clear and explicit method of estimating the assessment of lost natural value that would allow approximating the monetary value of a given terrain and determine the most favourable direction of its management. Application of monetary assessment of natural habitats requires its adjustment to Polish conditions. Due to the similarity of climate and geomorphological conditions in Central Europe, it is possible to adopt elements of habitat assessments used in the Czech Republic and in Germany. Natural habitat assessment will provide a solid base for preventing conflicts caused by the needs of economic development at the expense of local protection of the natural environment. As a result, it will be easier to achieve an agreement between different parties in the investment process, and, moreover, the assessment method will prevent additional financial losses, generated during the process of achieving functionality by the habitats. Correct analysis of the values of natural habitats may significantly reduce losses in the natural environment and aid in the selection and choice of the most relevant reclamation method.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
47-55
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2014-09-01
online
2015-06-27
Twórcy
autor
- Institute of Environmental Protection – National Research Institute in Warsaw, Krucza Str.5/11d, 00-548 Warsaw, Poland, kwszendera@poczta.onet.pl
autor
- Comfreylab Waldemar Szendera, Kolonia Podlesie 5, 43-267 Suszec, Poland
autor
- Comfreylab Waldemar Szendera, Kolonia Podlesie 5, 43-267 Suszec, Poland
Bibliografia
- Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR:
- Chmielewski W. 2011. Studium uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego gminy Suszec, Część A – Uwarunkowania rozwoju, Prac. Urban. w Rybniku Sp. z o.o., Rybnik.
- Chytrý M., Kučera T., Kočí M., Grulich V. & Lustyk P. 2010. Katalog biotopů České republiky. Ed. 2. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha.
- Kasztelewicz Z., Sypniowski S. 2011. Kierunki rekultywacji w polskich kopalniach węgla brunatnego na wybranych przykładach. Górn. i Geoinż., 35, 3: 119–131.
- Matuszkiewicz W. 2007. Identification handbook for plant communities (in Polish: Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski). Ser. Vademecum geobotanicum. PWN, Warszawa.
- Miłkowski T. 2010. Prognoza oddziaływania na środowisko studium uwarunkowań i zagospodarowania przestrzennego gminy Suszec, II Edycja, Prac. Urban. w Rybniku Sp. z o.o., Rybnik.
- Ostręga A., Uberman R. 2010. Kierunki rekultywacji i zagospodarowania – sposób wyboru, klasyfikacja i przykłady. Górn. i Geoinż., 34, 4: 445–461.
- Pierzchała Ł. 2013. Ochrona przyrody a rozwój gospodarczy – konflikty i zbieżności (wycena siedlisk przyrodniczych), GIG, Katowice, dn. 15.02. 2013 r. [PowerPoint presentation], .
- Seják J., Dejmal I. & kol. 2003. Hodnocení a oceňování biotopů ČR. Český ekologický ústav, Praha.
- Trząski L., Mana V. 2008. Monetary value assessment of biotopes in the Borek river valley, Sosnowiec – a methodology proposal for Poland. Research reports mining and environ., 3: 79–90.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_environ-2015-0042