Ecosystem services for connecting actors – lessons from a symposium

• Autorzy: Paul Opdam , Christian Albert , Christine Fürst , Adrienne Grêt-Regamey , Janina Kleemann , Dawn Parker , Daniele La Rosa , Katja Schmidt , Grace B. Villamor , Ariane Walz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper is a communication from the corresponding symposium at the Global Land Project Open Science Meeting, Berlin, March 2014. We explored the assumption that the ecosystem services-(ES) concept has the potential to support communication and collaboration between actors in land use planning. If true, the concept could facilitate collaborative planning processes. We analyse how to evolve a planning context in which governance networks at the local landscape level gain importance in decision making, while the central government delegates power. From case studies presented during the symposium we learned that the ES-concept has been explored for application in local land use planning around the world. However, whether ES are recognized as a useful planning concept depends on individual actor preferences and cultural and contextual factors, such as the actual nature-human relationship and gender differences. Also, successful application requires the support of novel assessment, design and visualization tools, which are designed to foster collaboration and social learning. The potential of the concept to contribute to collaborative relationships needs further investigation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Local land use planning; community-basedlearning; governance networks; market mechanism; individual and cultural variation; perception of value

• Wydawca: Sciendo
• Czasopismo: Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 2
• Numer: 1

Daty

otrzymano

2014-05-08

zaakceptowano

2015-02-02

online

2015-06-01

Twórcy

autor

Paul Opdam

• Wageningen University
  Department of Land Use Planning, Alterra, Nature and Society
  Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands

autor

Christian Albert

• Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz
  Universität Hannover, Department Environmental Politics, Helmholtz
  Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

autor

Christine Fürst

• Center for Development Research (ZEF), Department
  of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, University of Bonn,
  Bonn, Germany

autor

Adrienne Grêt-Regamey

• ETH Zürich, Planning of Landscape and Urban
  Systems (PLUS), Institut für Raum- und Landschaftsentwicklung
  (IRL), Zürich, Switzerland

autor

Janina Kleemann

• Center for Development Research (ZEF), Department
  of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, University of
  Bonn, Bonn, Germany

autor

Dawn Parker

• School of Planning, University of Waterloo,
  Waterloo, Canada

autor

Daniele La Rosa

• University of Catania, Department of Architecture,
  Catania, Italy

autor

Katja Schmidt

• Universität Potsdam, Institut für Erd- und Umweltwissenschaften,
  Potsdam-Golm, Germany

autor

Grace B. Villamor

• Center for Development Research (ZEF), Department
  of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, University of
  Bonn, Germany

autor

Ariane Walz

• Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, Potsdam
  University, Potsdam, Germany

Bibliografia

• [1] Hauck J., Schweppe-Kraft B., Albert C., Görg C., Jax K., JensenR., et al., The Promise of the Ecosystem Services-concept forPlanning and Decision-Making, GAIA, 2013, 22, 232-236
• [2] Hermann A., Schleifer S., Wrbka T., The concept of ecosystemservices regarding landscape research: a review, Living Rev.Landscape Res., 2011, 5, 1-37[Crossref]
• [3] Termorshuizen J., Opdam P., Landscape services as a bridgebetween landscape ecology and sustainable development,Landsc. Ecol., 2009, 24, 1037-1052
• [4] Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A.,Pejchar L., et al., Ecosystem services in decision making: timeto deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, 7, 21-28[Crossref]
• [5] Opdam P., Using ecosystem services in community basedplanning: science is not ready to deliver, In: Fu B., Jones B. K.(Eds.), Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment andCulture, Springer Verlag, 2013
• [6] Ruckelshaus M., McKenzie E., Tallis H., Guerry. A., Daily G.,Kareiva P., et al., Notes from the field: Lessons learned fromusing ecosystem service approaches to inform real worlddecisions, Ecol. Econ., 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009[WoS][Crossref]
• [7] von Haaren C., Albert C., Integrating Ecosystem Servicesand Environmental Planning: Limitations and Synergies,International Journal of Biodiversity Science, EcosystemServices & Management, 2011, 7, 150-167
• [8] Portman M.E., Ecosystem services in practice: Challengesto real world implementation of ecosystem services acrossmultiple landscapes – A critical review, Appl. Geogr., 2013, 45,185-192[WoS][Crossref]
• [9] Fürst, C., Pietzsch, K., Frank, S., Witt, A., Koschke, L.,Makeschin F., How to better consider sectorial planninginformation in regional planning - example afforestationand conversion, Journal of Environmental Planning andManagement, 2012, 55, 1-29
• [10] Albert C., Hauck J., Buhr N., von Haaren C., What ecosystemservices information do users want? Investigating interestsand requirements among landscape and regional planners inGermany, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1301-1313
• [11] Cowell R., Lennon M., The utilisation of environmentalknowledge in land-use planning: drawing lessons for anecosystem services approach, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy,2014, 32, 263-282, DOI: 10.1068/c12289j[WoS][Crossref]
• [12] Opdam P., Incorporating multiple ecological scales into thegovernance of landscape services, In: Padt F., Opdam P.,Polman N., Termeer C., (Eds.), Scale-Sensitive Governance ofthe Environment, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK,2014
• [13] Frank S., Fürst C., Witt A., Koschke L., Makeschin F., Makinguse of the ecosystem services-concept in regional planning-trade-offs from reducing water erosion, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29,1377-1391, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-9992-3[Crossref]
• [14] Fürst C., Frank S., Witt A., Koschke L., Makeschin, F.,Assessment of the effects of forest land use strategies on theprovision of Ecosystem Services at regional scale, J. Environ.Manage., 2013, 127, 96-116[WoS][Crossref]
• [15] Seppelt R., Lautenbach S., Volk M., Identifying trade-offsbetween ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a pleafor combining scenario analysis and optimization on differentspatial scales, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2013, 5, 458-463[Crossref][WoS]
• [16] Armitage D.R., Plummer R., Berkes F., Arthur R.I., Charles A.T.,Davidson-Hunt I.J., et al., Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, 7, 95–102[Crossref]
• [17] Opdam P., Nassauer J., Wang Z., Albert C., Bentrup G., CastellaJ-C., et al., Science for action at the local landscape scale,Landsc. Ecol., 2013, 28, 1439-1445
• [18] Helming K., Diehl K., Geneletti D., Wiggering H., Mainstreamingecosystem services in European policy impact assessment,Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 2013, 40, 82-87
• [19] Waylen K.A., Young J., Expectations and experiences of diverseforms of knowledge use: the case of the UK National EcosystemAssessment, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 2014, 32, 229-246[Crossref][WoS]
• [20] Newell P., Pattberg P., Schroeder H., Multi-actor governanceand the environment, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 2012, 37,365-387[Crossref]
• [21] Newig J., Koontz T. M., Multi-level governance, policyimplementation and participation: the EU’s mandatedparticipatory planning approach to implementingenvironmental policy, Journal of European Public Policy, 2014,21, 248-267
• [22] Lane M. B., McDonald G., Community-based EnvironmentalPlanning: Operational Dilemmas, Planning Principles andPossible Remedies, Journal of Environmental Planning andManagement, 2005, 48, 709-731
• [23] Berkes F., Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledgegeneration, bridging organizations and social learning, J.Environ. Manage., 2009, 90, 1692-1702[WoS][Crossref]
• [24] Fürst C., Opdam P., Inostroza L., Luque S., A balance scorecard tool for assessing how successful the ecosystem servicesconcept is applied in participatory land use planning, SpecialIssue: Integrating Ecosystem Services in Land use planning andDecision-Making Practice, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1435-1446
• [25] Martinico F., La Rosa D., Privitera R., Green Oriented UrbanDevelopment for urban ecosystem services provision in amedium sized city in Southern Italy, iForest, 2014, 7, 385-395,http://dx.doi.org/10.3832/ifor1171-007[Crossref]
• [26] Villamor G.B., van Noordwijk M., Djanibekov U., Chiong-JavierM.E., Catacutan D., Gender differences in land-use decisions:shaping multifunctional landscapes?, Curr. Opin. Environ.Sustain., 2014, 6, 128-133[Crossref][WoS]
• [27] Albert C., Aronson J., Fürst C., Opdam P., Integrating ecosystemservices in landscape planning: requirements, approaches,and impacts, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1277-1285
• [28] von Haaren C., Albert C., Barkmann J., de Groot R.S.,Spangenberg J., Schröter-Schlaack C., et al., From Explanationto Application: Introducing a Practice-Oriented Ecosystem Services Evaluation (PRESET) Model Adapted to the Context ofLandscape Planning and Management, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29,1335-1346
• [29] Chan K. M. A., Guerry A. D., Balvanera P., Klain S., Satterfield T.,Basurto X., et al., Where are Cultural and Social in EcosystemServices? A Framework for Constructive Engagement,Bioscience, 2012, 62, 744-756[WoS][Crossref]
• [30] Daniel C.D., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W.,Chan K.M.A., et al., Contributions of cultural services to theecosystem service agenda, PNAS, 2012, 109, 8812-8819
• [31] Hernández-Morcillo M., Plieninger T., Bieling C., An empiricalreview of cultural ecosystem service indicators, Ecol. Indic.,2013, 29, 434-444[WoS][Crossref]
• [32] Liu J., Opdam P., Valuing ecosystem services in communitybasedlandscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-basedapproach. Special Issue Integrating Ecosystem Services in Landuse planning and Decision-Making Practice, Landsc. Ecol.,2014, 29, 1347-1360
• [33] Grêt-Regamey A., Burlando P., Girot Ch., Lin E. S., Shaad D.,Vollmer D., Digital methods and collaborative platforms forinforming design values with science, In: Wissen Hayek U.,Fricker P., Buhmann E. (Eds.), Peer Reviewed Proceedings ofDigital Landscape Architecture Conference 2014 at ETH Zurich,(21-23 May, 2014, Zurich, Switzerland), Herbert WichmannVerlag, VDE VERLAG GMBH, Berlin/Offenbach, 2014, 46-56
• [34] Star S.L., This is not a boundary object: reflections on theorigin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values,2010, 35, 601-617[WoS]
• [35] Abson D. J., von Wehrden H., Baumgärtner S., Fischer J.,Hanspach J., Härdtle W., et al., Ecosystem services as aboundary object for sustainability, Ecol. Econ., 2014, 103, 29-37
• [36] Opdam P., Westerik J., Vos C., De Vries B., The role andEvolution of Boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscapeplanning, Planning Theory and Practice, 2015, 16, 63-78
• [37] Grêt-Regamey A., Celio E., Klein T.M., Wissen Hayek U.,Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactiveprocedural modeling for sustainable urban planning, Landsc.Urban. Plan., 2013, 109, 107-116[WoS][Crossref]

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/cass-2015-0001