Chemical communication in large carnivores: urine-marking frequencies in captive tigers and lions

• Autorzy: Barja I. , Miguel F.J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Environmental and social pressures can result in interspecies differences in marking behaviours. There is a strong relationship between marking behaviour and the environment. Therefore, closely related species that show behavioural differences in the wild may have different scent marking strategies. We conducted a comparative study of the urine-marking behaviours of tigers and lions in captivity (Madrid Zoo, open enclosures of 514 m² and 730 m² respectively, observations of 8 animals for each species). These two closely related species have different natural habitats. We observed interspecific differences in the rates, seasonal variations, and durations of the urine-marking acts. The marking rate was higher in tigers, which also showed seasonal variations not observed in lions. The duration of urine marking was lower in tigers than in lions. These differences seem to correspond to differences between tigers and lions in terms of their natural habitats (forest areas vs open areas), social organizations (solitary vs social), and reproductive biology patterns (seasonal polyoestrous vs annual polyoestrous).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Madrid Zoological Garden; captivity; carnivore; chemical communication; environment; large carnivore; lion; marking behaviour; natural habitat; seasonal variation; tiger; urine marking

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 58
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.397-400,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Barja I.

• Departamento Biología, Unidad Zoología, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain

autor

Miguel F.J.

Bibliografia

• Andersen K.F., Vulpius T. 1999 – Urinary volatile constituents of the lion, Panthera leo – Chem. Senses. 24: 179–189.
• Barja I. 2001 – La señalización en el lobo ibérico (Canis lupus signatus). Comparación con dos especies de hienas (Crocuta crocuta y Hyaena hyaena) – Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 372 pp.
• Barja I., Miguel F.J. 2004 – Variation in stimulus, seasonal context and response to urine marks by captive Iberian wolves (Canis lupus signatus) – Acta Ethol. 7: 51–57.
• Barja I., Miguel F.J., Bárcena F. 2005 – Faecal marking behaviour of Iberian wolf in different zones of their territory – Folia Zool. 54: 21–29.
• Bekoff M. 1979 – Ground scraping by male domestic dogs: a composite signal – J. Mammal. 60: 847–848.
• Brahmachary R.L. 1979 – The scent-marking of tigers – Tiger Paper, 6: 19–20.
• Brahmachary R.L., Datta J., Poddar-Sarkar M. 1991 – The marking fluid of the tiger – Mammalia, 55: 150–152.
• Brahmachary R.L., Dutta J. 1987 – Chemical communication in the tiger and leopard (In: Tigers of the world, Eds: R.L. Tilson, U.S. Seal) – Noyes Publication, USA, pp 296–302.
• Brahmachary R.L., Singh M. 2000 – Behavioral and chemical aspects of scent marking in the Asiatic lion – Curr. Sci. India, 78: 680–682.
• Brahmachary R.L., Singh M., Rajput M. 1999 – Scent marking in the Asiatic lion – Curr. Sci. India, 76: 480–481.
• Brown R.E., Macdonald D.W. 1985 – Social odours of Mammals – Clarendon Press, Oxford, 386 pp.
• Burger B.V., Viviers M.Z., Bekker J.P.I., le Roux M., Fish N., Fourie W.B., Weibchen G. 2008 – Chemical characterization of territorial marking fluid of male Bengal tiger, Panthera tigris – J. Chem. Ecol. 34: 659–671.
• Eaton R.L. 1970 – Group interactions, spacing and territoriality in cheetahs – Z. Tierpsychol. 27: 481–491.
• Gorman M.L., Trowbridge B.J. 1989 – The role of odor in the social lives of carnivores (In: Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution, Ed: J.L. Gittleman) – Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 57–88.
• Kleiman D.G. 1966 – Scent marking in the Canidae – script Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 18: 167–177.
• Martin P., Bateson P. 1986 – Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 200 pp.
• Mellem J.D. 1999 – A Comparative analysis of scent-marking, social and reproductive behavior in 20 species of small cats (Felis) – Am. Zool. 33: 151–166.
• Ralls K. 1971 – Mammalian scent marking – Science, 171: 443–449.
• Rieger I. 1981 – Hyaena hyaena – Mammalian species, 150: 1–5.
• Schaller G.B. 1967 – The deer and the tiger – University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 384 pp.
• Schaller G.B. 1972 – The Serengeti lion: a study predator-prey relations – University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 494 pp.
• Smith J.L.D., McDougal C., Miquelle D. 1989 – Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris – Anim. Behav. 37: 1–10.
• Tilson R.L., Seal U.S. 1987 – Tigers of the world – Noyes Publication, USA, 502 pp.
• Wells M.C., Bekoff M. 1981 – An observational study of scent marking in coyotes, Canis latrans – Anim. Behav. 29: 332–350.
• Wemmer C., Scow K. 1977 – Communication in the Felidae with emphasis on scent marking and contact patterns (In: How Animals Communicate, Ed: T.A. Sebeok) – Indiana University Press, Bloomington (IN), pp. 749–766.
• Wielebnowsky N., Brown J.L. 1998 – Behavioral correlates of physiological estrus in cheetahs – Zoo Biol. 17: 193–209.