Recenzja książki Kamili Baranieckiej-Olszewskiej, Ukrzyżowani. Współczesne misteria męki Pańskiej w Polsce (Toruń 2013)

• Autorzy: Kencki Patryk

Warianty tytułu

EN

Review of Kamila Baraniecka-Olszewska's book Ukrzyżowani. Współczesne misteria męki Pańskiej w Polsce (Toruń 2013)

Abstrakty

EN

Kamila Baraniecka-Olszewska has written her book from the perspective of an ethnologist and anthropologist, and yet the work may be of great interest to theatre scholars as well. Ukrzyżowani (‘The Crucified’) is a monograph of Polish contemporary passion mysteries. It consists of four chapters; two of those introduce the reader to the issues concerning the study of passion mysteries and the category of performance in the study of religious culture. The other two analyse two dimensions of the mystery distinguished by the author, i.e., “participa-tum” (what is participated in) and “participans” (who participates). One shortcoming of the monograph is that the historical outline it contains is rather feeble (and some of the theses advanced there are disputable). Its strong point, on the other hand, is an excellent presentation of contemporary passion spectacles, understood as religious performances. The typology proposed by the author is interesting: parish passion mysteries, monastic passion mysteries, and municipal passion mysteries (perhaps including additionally: school passion mysteries, and theatre passion mysteries). Application of tools originating from performance studies has turned out to be very fruitful in relation to both the spectacle analysis and to the categories of experience. The au-thor utilised the conceptual instruments developed by Edward L. Schieffelin in an interesting way and harmonised research on the “participans” and “participatum” in an appealing fashion. Another merit of the monograph, obviously derived from ethnographic practice, is how it incorporates quotes from the participants. Such testimonies, due to their verbal authenticity, make the narrative much livelier. Additionally, the quotes introduce an innumerable number of perspectives (since each participant has a separate point of view). The author has contributed substantially to our knowledge of the passion mystery, ad-vanced the methodology and proved how interesting research bordering on ethnology and theatre studies can be.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

theatre studies; ritual; performance

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Sztuki PAN
• Czasopismo: Pamiętnik Teatralny
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 64
• Numer: 1(253)
• Strony: 161-167

Twórcy

autor

Kencki Patryk

• Instytut Sztuki Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Bibliografia

• R. Bauman, Performance, [w:] Folklore, Cultural Performance and Popular Entertainments. A Communication-centered Handbook, red. idem, Oxford 1992.
• J. Demel, „Misterium Męki Pańskiej” w Kalwarii Zebrzydowskiej. Opis widowiska z lat 1977, 1978, „Literatura Ludowa” 1986 nr 3.
• J. Eistaedt, Mówić o misterium – mówić o sobie, [w:] Religijność ludowa na pograniczach kulturowych i etnicznych, red. I. Bukowska-Floreńska, Katowice 1999.
• L. Howe, Risk, Ritual, Performance, “The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute” 2000 nr 1.
• J. Lewański, Dramat i teatr średniowiecza i renesansu w Polsce, Warszawa 1981.
• D. Parkin, The Power of the Bizarre, [w:] The Politics of Cultural Performance, red. D. Parkin, L. Caplan, H. Fischer, Oxford 1996.
• I. Rupikowa, Teatr religijny w diecezji katowickiej w latach 1978–1989, [w:] Wokół współczesnego dramatu i teatru religijnego w Polsce (1979–1989), red. I. Sławińska, W. Kaczmarek, Wrocław 1993.
• E. L. Schieffelin, On Failure and Performance. Throwing the Medium out the Séance, [w:] The Performance of Healing, red. C. Laderman, M. Roseman, London – New York 1996.
• idem, Performance and the Cultural Construction of Reality, “American Ethnologist” 1985 nr 4 .
• idem, Problematizing Performance, [w:] Ritual, Performance, Media, red. F. Hughes-Freeland, London – New York 1998.