Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 13 | 241-253
Tytuł artykułu

Współczesna debata telewizyjna a konflikt destruktywny

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
EN
Modern TV debate and destructive conflict
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
EN
The article proves the point that modern public debates on TV, such as Jan Pospieszalski’s Warto rozmawiać [It’s worth talking], aired since 2004 on channel 2 of Poland’s public broadcasting corporation TVP, are communicative events based on destructive conflict, i.e. the ones that, according to L. Kriesberg, do not actually aim at a resolution of a problem, but serve as the occasion for a manifestation of aggression, while the aim of the argument is not to overcome differences dividing the warring parties but to subdue the opponent. This results from the particular communicative situation of a TV debate and the adopted attitude to, first, attract attention and then to satisfy the needs of the secondary recipient – the viewer. To achieve that, such elements as the choice of the subject for a debate, its scenario, selection of the audience, and then the verbal and non-verbal behaviour of the audience, are all subordinated to the purpose. Ultimately, such a TV debate violates the rules and strategies typical for a constructive and rational debate, which are subsequently replaced with the types of behaviour representative for destructive conflict, i.e. lack of openness to the arguments of the opponent, the attitude of defeating the antagonist, reluctance to find other solutions than one’s own, acts of provoking or inciting, undermining credibility of opponents, shifting the focus of a debate from the essential matter to that of a personal critical remarks, introducing ad hominem abusive that involves insulting one’s opponent, a refusal to work out a common position, etc. It is this pattern for a TV debate, i.e. one that has become a hasty fruitless formation and presentation of opinions devoid of conclusion and designed primarily to offend the interlocutor and to provide the audience with excited and short-lived emotions, that enhances the common belief that dialogue and problem solving in public discourse are not possible and that antagonism is a dominant factor in it.
Rocznik
Numer
13
Strony
241-253
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Poznań
Bibliografia
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.desklight-ebbb506a-fa25-4a92-84d8-ad44137c372e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.