Aristotelian Politiké Philía as a Subject of Moral Education

• Autorzy: Rajský Andrej

Warianty tytułu

PL

Arystotelesowska politiké philía jako przedmiot wychowania moralnego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The concept of moral education in Slovakia is currently undergoing a curricular transformation which is connected with issues concerning the theoretical foundation and basic philosophical setting of ethical education. The conceptual framework of the scientific discussion on ethical education has been introduced; its culmination is the neo-Aristotelian thesis about the philiatic character, which needs to be developed and strengthened educationally. The issue of friendship (philía) completes the discussion on virtues in Nicomachean Ethics and highlights the positive quality of interpersonal relationships as areté, that is, a disposition that can be purposefully pursued, i.e. intentionally formed. Aristotle’s well-known theory of friendship (philía) distinguishes between two kinds of imperfect, false friendship (‘for pleasure’ or ‘for profit’) and true friendship; moral good is its goal. Besides the vertical gradation of this quality concerning its perfection (two kinds – imperfect, false friendship and true friendship), it also offers a horizontal differentiation of forms of social realisation of friendship in the context of community (favour, eunoia) and wider society (concord, politiké philía). ‘Political friendship’ is thus presented as a civic virtue, worthy of effort (cf. EN VIII.10; EE 1242b; Pol. III.5, IV.2). Character education, with a focus on the development of this quality, is manifested not only as the subject of cultivating the individual personality for the ‘happy life’ of man but also as a political requirement, reflecting the interests of the state.

PL

Pojęcie wychowania moralnego w programach szkolnych na Słowacji przechodzi aktualnie transformację; wiąże się to z problematyką teoretycznej podstawy i podstawowej filozoficznej obudowy etycznej wychowania. Artykuł wprowadza w ramy pojęciowe dyskusji naukowej o edukacji etycznej, której konkluzją jest neoarystotelesowska teza o przyjacielskim (philiatic) charakterze człowieka, który należy rozwijać i wzmacniać w ramach edukacji. Problematyka przyjaźni (philía) dopełnia rozważania na temat cnót w Etyce nikomachejskiej i podkreśla pozytywną właściwość relacji międzyludzkich jako areté, czyli dyspozycji, do której można celowo dążyć, tzn. intencjonalnie ją formować (kształtować). Znana Arystotelesowska teoria przyjaźni (philía) rozróżnia dwa rodzaje niedoskonałej, fałszywej przyjaźni (dla przyjemności i dla zysku) oraz przyjaźń prawdziwą, której celem jest dobro moralne. Poza wertykalnym jej stopniowaniem ze względu na doskonałość (dwa rodzaje niedoskonałej, fałszywej przyjaźni i przyjaźń prawdziwa) oferuje ona także horyzontalne zróżnicowanie form społecznej realizacji przyjaźni w kontekście wspólnoty (favour, eunoia) i szeroko pojętego społeczeństwa (concord, politiké philía). „Przyjaźń polityczna” jest zatem przedstawiana jako cnota obywatelska, warta wysiłku (por. EN [Etyka nikomachejska] VIII.10; EE [Etyka eudemejska] 1242b; Pol. [Polityka] III.5, IV.2). Kształcenie charakteru z akcentem na rozwijanie jakości, jaką jest przyjaźń, przejawia się nie tylko jako przedmiot kultywowania indywidualnej osobowości, ukierunkowanej na „szczęśliwe życie” człowieka, ale także jako wymóg polityczny, odzwierciedlający interes państwa.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

politiké philía; wychowanie moralne; etyka cnót; charakter; Słowacja

EN

politiké philía; moral education; virtue ethics; character; Slovakia

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo UMK
• Czasopismo: Paedagogia Christiana
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 1/51
• Strony: 41-64

Twórcy

autor

Rajský Andrej

• Trnava University,

Bibliografia

• Adkins, A. W. H. (2006). Amicizia e auto-sufficienza in Omero e Aristotele. In E. Spinelli (Ed.), Amicizia e concordia. Etica, fisica, politica in età preplatonica (pp. 11–42). Roma: Euroma.
• Anderson, A. R. & Fowers, B. J. (2020). An exploratory study of friendship characteristics and their relations with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 260–280.
• Aquinas, Thomas (1947). The Summa Theologica. Benziger Bros. Edition. Transl. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Retrieved June 12, 2022, from: https:// www.ccel.org/a/aquinas/summa/home.html.Aristotle. Eudemian Ethics. Perseus Digital Library Project. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0050%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D1214a.
• Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Perseus Digital Library Project. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0054.
• Aristotle. (2011). Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics. Transl. R. C. Bartlett & S. D. Collins. London: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd. Retrieved January 25, 2023, from: https://vdoc.pub/documents/aristotles-nicomachean-ethics-16c1478ckqg8.
• Aristotle. Politics. Perseus Digital Library Project. Retrieved June 25, 2022, from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0058.
• Aristotle. Rhetoric. Perseus Digital Library Project. Retrieved June 28, 2022, from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0060%3Abekker+page%3D1381a.
• Arthur, J. (2008). Traditional Approaches to Character Education in Britain and America. In L. P. Nucci & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education (pp. 80–98). New York: Routledge.
• Berkowitz, M. V. & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education? A research-driven guide for educators. Washington, D.C.: Character Education Partnership.
• Buber, M. (2002). Between Man and Man. London–New York: Routledge Classics. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/10616720/buber-between-man-and-man-in-bbpdf-polkfolk.
• Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S. & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134.
• Carr, D. (2002). Moral education and the perils of developmentalism. Journal of Moral Education, 31(1), 5–19.
• Carreras, A. (2012). Aristotle on other-selfhood and reciprocal shaping. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 29(4), 319–336.
• Chalierová, C. (1993). O filosofii Emmanuela Lévinase [About the philosophy of Emmanuel Lévinas]. Praha: Ježek.
• Cooper, J. M. (1977). Aristotle on the Forms of Friendship. The Review of Metaphysics, 30(4), 619–648.
• Copp, D. & Sobel, D. (2004). Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics. Ethics, 114(3), 514–554.
• Curren, R. (2000). Aristotle on the Necessity of Public Education. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• D’Avenia, M. (Ed.). (2009). La necessità dell’amicizia. Roma: Armando.De Caro, M. & Vaccarezza, M. S. (2020). Morality and Interpretation: the Principle of Phronetic Charity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 23, 295–307.
• Eisenberg, N. (Ed.). (1982). The development of prosocial behavior. New York: Academic Press.
• Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1979). Development of children’s prosocial moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 15, 128–137.
• Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B. & Van Court, P. (1995). Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 66, 1179–1197.
• Eisenberg, N. & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial Development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Social, Emotional and Personality Development (pp. 701–778). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Faure, M. (2012). Practical wisdom, virtue of character and friendship in Aristotle’s horizon of the human good. Phronimon, 13(1), 1–37.
• Fowers, B. J. & Anderson, A. R. (2018). Aristotelian philia, contemporary friendship, and some resources for studying close relationships. In T. Harrison & D. Walker (Eds.), The Theory and Practice of Virtue Education (pp. 184–196). New York: Routledge.
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Hoyos-Valdés, D. (2017). The notion of character friendship and the cultivation of virtue. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48, 66–82.
• Irrera, E. (2005). Between Advantage and Virtue: Aristotle’s Theory of Political Friendship. History of Political Thought, 26, 565–585.
• Jonas, M. E. (2016). Plato’s Anti-Kohlbergian Program for Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(2), 205–217.
• Jůva, V. (1983). Pojetí mravní výchovy v socialistické společnosti [The concept of moral education in a socialist society]. Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty Brněnské univerzity, 18, 11–40.
• Killen, M. & Smetana, J. (Eds). (2006). Handbook of moral development. New Jersey: Lawrwnce Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Kohlberg, L. (1981). The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice (Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 1). San Francisco: Harper & Row.
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages (Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper & Row.Kohlberg, L. & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42, 449–496.
• Kristjánsson, K. (2018). Ten un-Aristotelian reasons for the instability of Aristotelian character friendships. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49(1), 40–58.
• Kristjánsson, K. (2020a). Aristotelian Character Friendship as a ‘Method’ of Moral Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39, 349–364.
• Kristjansson, K. (2020b). Filtering friendship through phronesis: ‘One thought too many’? Philosophy, 95(1), 113–137.
• Kristjánsson, K. (2020c). Learning from friends and terminating friendships: Retrieving friendship as a moral educational concept. Educational Theory, 70(2), 129–149.
• Kristjánsson, K. (2021a). The moral value of Aristotelian friendships for utility, with an online example. Amity: The Journal of Friendship Studies, 7(1), 1–22.
• Kristjánsson, K. (2021b). Online Aristotelian Character Friendship as an Augmented Form of Penpalship. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 289–307.
• Kristjánsson, K. (2022). Friendship for virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lapsley, D. K. & Power, F. C. (2005). Character psychology and character education. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
• Leontsini, E. (2013). The Motive of Society: Aristotle on Civic Friendship, Justice, and Concord. Res Publica, 19, 21–35.
• Levinas, E. (2007). Totality and Infinity. An Essey on Exteriority. Transl. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from: https:// www.academia.edu/44228291/Totality_and_Infinity_An_Essay_on_Exteriority_Emmanuel_Levinas.
• López, J., Fernández, V. & Ortis de Montellano, S. (2022). Education in Virtues and Education in Competencies: The Case of Educating for Leadership. Unpublishedconference paper for the 10th Annual Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues conference at Oriel College, Oxford University, Thursday 8th – Saturday 10th September 2022.
• McCoy, M. (2013). Friendship and Moral Failure in Aristotle’s Ethics. In M. Mc-Coy, Wounded Heroes: Vulnerability as a Virtue in Ancient Greek Literature and Philosophy (pp. 140–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Natali, C. (2008). L’amicizia secondo Artotele. Bollettino della Società filosofica italiana, 195, 13–28.
• Nucci, L. P. & Narvaez, D. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of Moral and Character Education. New York: Routledge.
• Nussbaum, M. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness. Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved June 30, 2022,from: https://toleratedindividuality.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/the-fragility-of--goodness-luck-and-ethics-in-greek-tragedy-and-philosophy.pdf.
• Plato. Republic. Perseus Digital Library Project. Retrieved June 15, 2022, from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0168.
• Plato. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo. Perseus Digital Library Project. Retrieved June 22, 2022, from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0170.
• Plato. Laws. Perseus Digital Library Project. Retrieved June 22, 2022, from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0166.
• Podmanický, I. & Rajský, A. (et al.) (2014). Prosociálnosť a etická výchova. Skúsenosti a perspektívy [Prosociality and Ethical education. Experiences and perspectives]. Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis.
• Power, F. C., Nuzzi, R. J., Narvaez, D., Lapsley, D. K. & Hunt, T. C. (Eds.) (2008). Moral education: a handbook. Westpoint, Connecticut, London: Praeger.
• Premoli, P. (2006). Felicità, bene e amicizia. Dietrich von Hildebrand legge Aristotele. Convegno Thomas International: Quale felicità per l’Europa di oggi? Palermo 18 ottobre 2006.
• Premoli, P. (2007). Chi trova un amico che cosa trova? Osservazioni filosofiche sull’amicizia. Relazione presso l’associazione Nuove Onde, Milano 2 febbraio 2007.
• Rajský, A. & Podmanický, I. (et al.) (2016). Človek človeku: k prameňom etickej výchovy [Man to man: to the sources of ethical education]. Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis.
• Sherman, N. (1987). Aristotle on friendship and the shared life. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 47(4), 589–613.
• Schwarzenbach, S. A. (1996). On civic friendship. Ethics, 107, 97–128.
• Testa, I. (2011). Philía e azione sociale. Da Aristotele a Hegel. In L. Cortella, F. Mora & I. Testa (Eds.), La socialità della ragione (pp. 249–262). Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.
• The Holy Bible. Retrieved June 30, 2022, from: http://triggs.djvu.org/djvu-editions.com/BIBLES/DRV/Download.pdf.
• Valk, V. F. (2004). Political Friendship and the Second Self in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Innovations: A Journal of Politics, 5, 49–63.
• Viano, C. (2015). Amicizia, ostilità e passioni di rivalità nella Retorica di Aristotele. In B. Centrone (Ed.), La Retorica di Aristotele e la dottrina delle passioni (pp. 121–142). Pisa: Pisa University Press.
• Wiesenganger, M. & Katrincová, T. (2017). Mravná výchova v štátnom národnom školstve na Slovensku v rokoch 1918–1939 [Moral education in the state national education in Slovakia in the years 1918–1939]. Trnava: Trnavská univerzita.Zingano, M. (2015). The Conceptual Unity of Friendship in the Eudemian and the Nicomachean Ethics. Apeiron, 48(2), 195–219.
• Zucca, D. (2017). Le tre amicizie di Aristotele. Consecutio rerum, 2(3), 81–103. Acknowledgement: The article is an output of the VEGA project no. 1/0143/23.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/PCh.2023.002