Znaczenie kolejnych lokalizacji przystani promów na wyspie Hongkong na tle przemian społecznych i kształtowania się lokalnej tożsamości

• Autorzy: Osińska Małgorzata

Warianty tytułu

EN

The meaning of Piers’ locations at Hong Kong Island in the background of social change and the process of shaping of local identity

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this paper is to understand the meaning of the Star Ferry and Queen’s Pier locations for the process of shaping Hong Kong identity and why unlike in previous similar cases, the latest removal of the Star Ferry and Queen’s Pier met with resistance from Hong Kong citizens. Looking at Piers of the saga from the historical perspective, it is found that spatial practice of the pre‑Second World War (WWII) piers was a mirror of a colonial and racially segregated city. The public space in the commercial heart of Hong Kong that housed the previous generations of piers was not accessible to the Chinese community, thus denying them rights to the city. It was only after WWII when the Government carried out further reclamation to meet the needs of an industrialising economy that inclusive public spaces were conceived in the commercial heart, enabling the general public to enjoy the city. Therefore when the Government decided to remove this very first public space in the political and economic heart of the city to conceive further reclamation for restructuring the economy, the citizens were determined to defend it. Piers were a physical and mental border of the two worlds, the edge of the city. With the social changes after WWII they were transformed into symbolic centres with a crucial meaning for shaping of the Hong Kong identity.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

city; Hong Kong; identity; space

• Wydawca: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Czasopismo: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: 46
• Strony: 329-351

Twórcy

autor

Osińska Małgorzata

Bibliografia

• Abbas A., Hong Kong. Culture and the Politics of Disappearance, Minneapolis 1997, Public Worlds, 2.
• Agrest D.I., Architecture from Without. Theoretical Framings for a Critical Practice, Cambridge (Mass.) 1993.
• Bokszański Z., Tożsamości zbiorowe, Warszawa 2005.
• Castells M., Społeczeństwo sieci, przeł. M. Marody i in., red. nauk. tenże, Warszawa 2008, Wiek Informacji, 1.
• Chai K., Central Star Ferry Pier: Policy, Politics and Protest in the Making of Heritage in Hong Kong, Postgraduate Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, 2009, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b4758135.
• Chan P.S.S., A Survey Report of Historical Buildings and Structures within the Project Area of the Central Reclamation Phase III, The Antiquities and Museums Office, Leisure and Cultural Service Department, 2001, [online] http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/report/eiareport/eia_0552001/report/vol2/eia_0552001appendix_w.pdf.
• Development Bureau – Planning and Lands Branch – Publications and Press Releases, [online] http://archive.is/www.devb‑plb.gov.hk.
• Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organization of Culture Difference, ed. F. Barth, Illinois 1969.
• Hałas E., Symbole w interakcji, Warszawa 2001.
• Jałowiecki B., Społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni, Warszawa 1988.
• Jelonek A.W., Wielokulturowość, separatyzm i budowa państwa narodowego w Tajlandii, Kraków 2011.
• LegCo Paper no CB(1)1444/06‑07(01), Queen’s Pier Is Not Moving Anywhere! Statement of Artists, Cultural Practitioners and Academics in Support of the Preservation of Queen’s Pier In Situ, 17 IV 2007, [online] http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06‑07/english/panels/plw/papers/plw0423cb1‑1444‑1‑e.pdf.
• Legislative Council, Background brief on Central and Wanchai reclamation, LC Paper No. CB(1) 18/03‑04(01), [online] http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr03‑04/english/panels/plw/papers/eaplw1013cb1‑18‑1e.pdf.
• Lo A., Hong Kong Has a Golden Chance to Restore Queen’s Pier to its Former Glory, „South China Morning Post” 2016, 27 IV, [online] http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight‑opinion/article/1939403/hong‑kong‑has‑golden‑chance‑restore‑queens‑pier‑its‑former.
• McDonogh G., Wong C., Global Hong Kong, New York–London 2005.
• Ng M.K. i in., Spatial Practice, Conceived Space and Lived Space: Hong Kong’s „Piers Saga” through the Lefebvrian Lens, „Planning Perspectives” 2010, Vol. 25, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2010.505060.
• O Krakowie raz jeszcze. Szkice do portretu miasta, red. K. Frysztacki, Z. Mach, Kraków 2008.
• Shelton B., Karakiewicz J., Kvan T., The Making of Hong Kong from Vertical to Volumetric, London– New York 2011, Planning, History and Environment Series.
• Szczepański M., „Miasto socjalistyczne” i świat społeczny jego mieszkańców, Warszawa 1991, Rozwój Regionalny, Rozwój Lokalny, Samorząd Terytorialny, 32.
• Turner J.C., Oakes P.J., The Significance of the Social Identity Concept for Social Psychology with Reference to Individualism, Interactionism and Social Influence, „British Journal of Social Psychology” 1986 Vol. 25, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1986.tb00732.x.
• Turner M., 60s/90s, Hong Kong Sixties. Designing Identity, red. tenże, I. Ngan, Hong Kong 1996.
• Virilio P., Lost Dimension, New York 1991, Semiotext(e) Foreign Agents Series.
• Walker A., Hong Kong. The Contractors’ Experience, Hong Kong 1995.
• Wallis A., Socjologia wielkiego miasta, Warszawa 1967, Omega, 69.
• Welsh F., A History of Hong Kong, London 1993.
• Znaniecki F., Socjologiczne podstawy ekonomii ludzkiej, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 1938, nr 1.
• Zukin S., Postmodern Urban Landscapes: Mapping Culture and Power, [w:] Modernity and Identity, red. S. Lash, J. Friedman, Oxford 1992.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.46.14