Dyplomacja naukowa Unii Europejskiej w czasie pandemii COVID-19

• Autorzy: Szkarłat Monika

Warianty tytułu

EN

9

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Celem artykułu jest analiza istoty i specyfiki dyplomacji naukowej Unii Europejskiej (UE) w czasie pandemii COVID-19. W tym celu przeanalizowano podejścia w definiowaniu pojęcia dyplomacji naukowej oraz jej genezę; podjęto próbę określenia specyfiki dyplomacji naukowej UE oraz dokonano analizy działań UE w czasie pandemii COVID-19, które mieszczą się w zakresie definicyjnym dyplomacji naukowej. W artykule odwołano się do koncepcji autonomii strategicznej UE jako szerszej formuły politycznej, której część powinna stanowić dyplomacja naukowa. Sformułowano również kierunki zmian, które pozwolą doprecyzować miejsce i rolę dyplomacji naukowej UE w przyszłości. Do analizy wykorzystano źródła pierwotne (akty normatywne, dokumenty polityczne) oraz dostępną literaturę naukową i raporty dotyczące dyplomacji naukowej, międzynarodowej współpracy naukowej. Stworzono autorskie zestawienie działań realizowanych przez UE w czasie pandemii COVID-19, dzieląc je zgodnie z kryterium typów dyplomacji naukowej oraz kierunku oddziaływania. Pozwala to stwierdzić, że dyplomacja naukowa UE to zespół działań wspierających i uzupełniających aktywność państw członkowskich oraz działań koordynacyjnych w tych obszarach, gdzie reakcja wspólnotowa tworzy wartość dodaną. Ma to znaczenie dla wyznaczenia dalszego rozwoju dyplomacji naukowej UE i przygotowania organizacji na przyszłe kryzysy wymagające ponadnarodowej odpowiedzi z wykorzystaniem współpracy naukowej i wiedzy eksperckiej w procesie decyzyjnym.

EN

The aim of the article is to analyse the essence and specificity of the European Union’s (EU) science diplomacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this aim, approaches in defining the concept of science diplomacy and its genesis have been analysed; an attempt has been made to define the specificity of the EU science diplomacy, and the analysis has been conducted of the EU’s actions during the COVID-19 pandemic that fall within the defining scope of science diplomacy. The article refers to the concept of strategic autonomy of the EU as a broader political formula, of which science diplomacy should be a part. The author also formulates directions for changes that will clarify the place and role of EU science diplomacy in the future. Primary sources (normative acts, policy documents), and available scholar literature and reports on science diplomacy and international scientific cooperation were used for the analysis. The list of activities implemented by the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic was created, dividing them according to the criterion of types of science diplomacy and the direction of impact. This allows us to conclude that EU science diplomacy is a set of activities that support and complement the activities of the Member States, as well as coordination activities in those areas, where the community response creates added value. This is important to determine the further development of EU science diplomacy and prepare the organization for future crises requiring a supranational response using scientific cooperation and expertise in the decision-making process.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

dyplomacja naukowa; pandemia; COVID-19; Unia Europejska; UE

EN

Science diplomacy; COVID-19 pandemic; the European Union; EU

• Wydawca: Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych, Uniwersytet Warszawski
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Europejski
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: 2(64)
• Strony: 9-24

Daty

wydano

2022

Twórcy

autor

Szkarłat Monika

• Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin

Bibliografia

• ANGHEL Suzana, IMMENKAMP Beatrix, LAZAROU Elena, SAULNIER Jerôme Leon, WILSON Alex Benjamin (2020), On the path to ‘strategic autonomy’: The EU in an evolving geopolitical environment, European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652096/EPRS_STU(2020)652096_EN.pdf (30.09.2020).
• BARSTON Ronald P. (2019), Modern Diplomacy, London, New York.
• BAUER Matthias, ERIXON Fredrik (2020), Europa na tropie suwerenności technologicznej. Szanse i zagrożenia, Warsaw Enterprise Institute, Warszawa, https://wei.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Raport-Suwerennosc-FINAL.pdf (03.12.2020).
• BENSAUDE-VINCENT Bernadette (2014), The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: The case of “public engagement in science”, „Public Understanding of Science”, vol. 23, no. 3.
• BJOLA Corneliu, KORNPROBST Markus (2018), Understanding International Diplomacy: Theory, Practice and Ethics, London. Dyplomacja naukowa Unii Europejskiej w czasie pandemii COVID-19 21
• CAMPBELL Cathleen (2015), US Science Diplomacy with Arab Countries, w: Lloyd S. Davis, Robert G. Patman (eds.), Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn?, Singapore.
• COPELAND Daryl (2016), Science Diplomacy, in: Costas M. Constantinou, Pauline Kerr, Paul Sharp (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore.
• EUBUSINESS (WWW), EU law, https://www.eubusiness.com/topics/eulaw (10.04.2021).
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2016), Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Implementation of the strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation, COM (2016) 657 final, Brussels, 13.10.2016.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2017), Europe’s Future: Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World. Reflections of the RISE Group, Innovation and Science Policy Experts (RISE) High Level Group, March 2017, Luxembourg. DOI: 10.2777/348700
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2018), 2018 Report on the Implementation of the Strategy for International Cooperation in Research and Innovation, https://www.ffg.at/sites/default/files/downloads/progress_report_oct-2018.pdf (25.10.2018).
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2019), 101 Ideas on the Future of Research and Innovation in Europe, DG for Research and Innovation, February 2019, Brussels. DOI: 10.2777/296402
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2020), Strategic Plan 2020-2024. DG Research and Innovation, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/rtd_sp_2020_2024_en.pdf (08.10.2020)
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021a), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Global Approach to Research and Innovation Europe’s strategy for international cooperation in a changing world, COM(2021) 252 final, Brussels, 18.05.2021.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021b), Directorate-General Research and Innovation, https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/research-and-innovation_en#responsibilities (20.10.2021).
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021c), EU Science Hub, The European Commission’s science and knowledge service, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/about/organisation (25.10.2021).
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021d), European innovation scoreboard, https://ec.europa.eu/info/research--and-innovation/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard_en (25.10.2021).
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021e), Proposal for a Council Recommendation on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe, COM (2021) 407 final, Brussels, 16.07.2021.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021f), Strategic forum for international scientific and technological cooperation, https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/europe--world/international-cooperation/sfic_en (27.10.2021).
• FERGUSON H. Yale, MANSBACH Richard (2004), Remapping Global Politics: History’s Revenge and Future Shock, Cambridge.
• FLINK Tim (2020), The sensationalist discourse of science diplomacy: A critical reflection, „The Hague Journal of Diplomacy”, vol. 15, no 3.
• FLINK Tim, SCHREITERER Ulrich (2010), Science Diplomacy at the Intersection of S&T Policies and Foreign Affairs: Toward a Typology of National Approaches, „Science and Public Policy”, vol. 37, no. 9.
• FUNTOWICZ Silvio, RAVETZ Jerome (1990), Science for Policy: Uncertainty and Quality, w: Silvio Funtowicz, Jerome Ravetz (eds.), Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Dordrecht.
• FUNTOWICZ Silvio, RAVETZ Jerome (1993), Science for the post-normal age, „Futures”, vol. 25, no. 7.
• GLUCKMAN Peter (2017), Enhancing evidence-informed policy making. A report by the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, July 2017, Aukland, https://dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2021-10/pmcsa-17-07-07-Enhancing-evidenceinformed-policy-making.pdf (07.07.2017).
• HEALY Stephen (2011), Post-normal science in postnormal times, „Futures”, vol. 43, no. 2.
• HELWIG Niklas (2021), Introduction: the EU’s Choices in Advancing Strategic Autonomy, w: Niklas Helwig (ed.), Strategic Autonomy and the Transformation of the EU. New Agendas for Security, Diplomacy, Trade and Technology, Report no. 67, April 2021, Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki, https://www.fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/fiia-report-67_niklas-helwig-et-al_strategic-autonomy-and-the-transformation-of-the-eu.pdf (30.04.2021).
• HOCKING Brian (2005), Rethinking the “New” Public Diplomacy, w: Jan Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke, New York.
• HOCKING Brian, MELISSEN Jan, RIORDAN Shaun, SHARP Paul (2012), Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century, Report No. 1, October 2012, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20121030_research_melissen.pdf (30.10.2012).
• HOOGHE Liesbet, MARKS Garry (2001), Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford.
• JAKOBSSON Andre, STOLZ Marcel (2021), Principled Big Tech: European Pursuit of Technological Autonomy, w: Niklas Helwig (ed.), Strategic Autonomy and the Transformation of the EU. New Agendas for Security, Diplomacy, Trade and Technology, Report no. 67, April 2021, Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki, https://www.fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ fiia-report-67_niklas-helwig-et-al_strategic-autonomy-and-the-transformation-of-the-eu.pdf (30.04.2021).
• JÖNSSON Christer (2016), States Only? The Evolution of Diplomacy, w: Gunther Hellmann, Andreas Fahrmeir, Milo Vec (eds.), The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present, Oxford.
• KELLEY John (2014), Agency Change. Diplomatic Action Veyond the State, Lanham, Boulder, New York, London.
• KEOHANE Robert, NYE Joseph (2001), Power and Interdependence, New York.
• KWIEK Marek (2012), Universities and Knowledge Production in Central Europe, „European Educational Research Journal”, vol. 11, no. 1.
• LEITJEN Jos (2017), Exploring the Future of Innovation Diplomacy, „European Journal of Futures Research”, vol. 5, art. 20.
• LEONARD Mark, SHAPIRO Jeremy (2019), Empowering EU Member States with Strategic Sovereignty, European Council on Foreign Relations, https://ecfr.eu/publication/strategic_sovereignty_how_europe_can_regain_the_capacity_to_act/ (25.06.2019).
• MELCHOR Lorenzo, ELORZA Ana, LACUNZA Izaskun (2021), Calling for a Systemic Change. Towards a European Union Science Diplomacy for Addressing Global Challenges, Version 2.0., February 2021, S4D4C Policy Report, Madrid, https://www.s4d4c.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ S4D4C-Calling-for-a-Systemic-Change-Policy-Report-v2.0-1.pdf (28.02.2021).
• MELISSEN Jan (2011), Beyond the New Public Diplomacy, Clingendael Paper no.3, October 2011, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20111014_cdsp_paper_jmelissen.pdf (14.10.2011).
• MOEDAS Carlos (2016), Science Diplomacy in the European Union, „Science & Diplomacy”, vol. 5, no. 1.
• NEW FRONTIERS in science diplomacy (2010), The Royal Society, American Association for the Advancement in Science, https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2010/new-frontiers-science-diplomacy/ (12.01.2010).
• NYE Joseph (2004), Power in the Global Information Age. From Realism to Globalization, London, New York.
• OECD (2021), OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Scoreboard, https://www.oecd.org/innovation/scoreboard.htm (25.10.2021).
• PAPON Pierre (2009), Intergovernmental Cooperation in the Making of European Research, w: Henri Delanghe, Ugur Muldur, Luc Soete (eds.), European Science and Technology Policy Towards Integration or Fragmentation?, Cheltenham, Northampton, MA.
• ROSENAU James (2006), The Study of World Politics: Volume 2: Globalization and Governance, London, New York.
• RÜFFIN Nicolas (2020), EU Science Diplomacy in q Contested Space of Multi-Level Governance: Ambitions, Constraints and Options for Action, „Research Policy”, vol. 49, no. 1.
• RUFFINI Pierre-Bruno (2017), Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations, Cham.
• RUNGIUS Charlotte, FLINK Tim (2020), Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy, „Humanities and Social Sciences Communications”, vol. 7, art. 102. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w
• SÁNCHEZ Juan Luis Manfredi (2020), Introduction to the Forum on COVID-19, „The Hague Journal of Diplomacy”, vol. 15, no. 4.
• SCHMIDT Evanthia (2019), Opening European Research to the World: Evidence from International Cooperation, „European Review”, vol. 27, no. 4.
• SFIC Task Force Science Diplomacy (2021), Survey Analysis on Science Diplomacy Strategies, Activities and Actors of EU Member States and Associated Countries, https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-1354-2021-INIT/en/pdf (27.05.2021).
• SOETE Luc, STIERNA Johan (2018), What matters in research and innovation? Reflections inspired from a ‘Tour d’Europe’, December 2018, European Commission, DG for Research and Innovation, Brussels. DOI: 10.2777/12022
• SZKARŁAT Monika (2020), Science diplomacy of Poland, „Humanities and Social Sciences Communications”, vol. 7, art. 59.
• SZKARŁAT Monika, ŁUSZCZUK Michał, RUFFINI Pierre-Bruno, MARZĘDA-MŁYNARSKA Katarzyna,
• PISARSKA Katarzyna, UMIŃSKA-WORONIECKA Anna, MUSIAŁ Kazimierz, MAZUR Grzegorz (2020), Dyplomacja naukowa. Koncepcja i praktyka, Lublin.
• TFUE, Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, OJ C 326, 25.10.2021.
• TINDEMANS Peter (2009), Post-war Research, Education and Innovation Policy-making in Europe, w: Henri Delanghe, Ugur Muldur, Luc Soete (eds.), European Science and Technology Policy Towards Integration or Fragmentation?, Cheltenham, Northampton, MA.
• TUE, Traktat o Unii Europejskiej, OJ C 326, 25.10.2021.
• TUREKIAN Vaughan, MACINDOE Sarah, COPRELAN Daryl, DAVIS Lloyd S., PATMAN Robert G., POZZA Maria (2015), The Emergence of Science Diplomacy, w: Lloyd S. Davis, Robert G. Patman (eds.), Science Diplomacy. New Day or False Dawn?, Singapore.
• Van LANGENHOVE Luk (2017), Tools for an EU Science Diplomacy, European Commission, DG for Research and Innovation, Brussels, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e668f8cf-e395-11e6-ad7c-01aa75ed71a1 (25.01.2017).
• ZERKA Pawel (2020), In sickness and in health: European cooperation during the coronavirus crisis, Policy Brief, European Council on Foreign Relations, https://ecfr.eu/publication/in_sickness_and_in_health_european_cooperation_during_coronavirus_crisis/ (08.07.2020).
• ZÜRN Michael, WÄLTI Sonia, ENDERLEIN Henrik (2010), Introduction, w: Michael Zürn, Sonia Wälti, Henrik Enderlein (eds.), Handbook on Multi-level Governance, Cheltenham, Northampton, MA.