Harmonia i postęp. Społeczno-polityczne poglądy Leonarda Trelawny’ego Hobhouse’a

• Autorzy: Grygieńć Janusz

Warianty tytułu

EN

Harmony and Progress. Social and Political Views of Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The subject of the article is the social and political thought of Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, one of the pioneers of British sociology and one of the main ideologists of the doctrine of New Liberalism. This essay’s aim consists in presenting both Hobhouse’s academic profile and his most important theoretical claims. It will depict the sources of his philosophical and sociological inspiration as well as his antipathies (particularly, his attitude towards Herbert Spencer). Hobhouse’s theoretical worldview will be portrayed as a systemic entity. The sources of all his social and political theses will be shown to spring from the content of his first, strictly philosophical work, The Theory of Knowledge. Hobhouse’s teleology, evolutionism and organicism originate directly form here.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

British idealism; New Liberalism; totalitarianism; democracy; liberalism; general will

• Wydawca: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Czasopismo: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: 4(26)
• Strony: 85-101

Twórcy

autor

Grygieńć Janusz

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Bibliografia

• Alexander S., L. T. Hobhouse. His Life and Work, „Economica” 1931, nr 33, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F2548034.
• Barnes H. E., Some Typical Contributions of English Sociology to Political Theory, „The American Journal of Sociology” 1922, Vol. 27, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F213376.
• Berlin I., Rzekomy relatywizm w XVIII‑wiecznejmyśli europejskiej, przeł. M. Pietrzak‑Merta, [w:] I. Berlin, Pokrzywione drzewo człowieczeństwa, red. H. Hardy, przeł. M. Pietrzak‑Merta, M. Tański, Warszawa 2004, Pejzaże Myśli. Idee, Stanowiska, Ludzie.
• Bosanquet B., Civilization of Christendom and Other Studies, London–New York 1893.
• Bosanquet B., Distinction between Mind and Its Objects, Bristol 1990.
• Bosanquet B., The Essentials of Logic. Being the Lectures on Judgment and Inference, London 1895.
• Bosanquet B., The Function of the State in Promoting the Unity of Mankind, [w:] tenże, Social and International Ideals. Being Studies in Patriotism, Freeport 1967.
• Bosanquet B., History of Aesthetic, London 1892.
• Bosanquet B., Implication and Linear Inference, London 1920.
• Bosanquet B., Introduction, [w:] tenże, The Philosophical Theory of the State, Aldershot 1993.
• Bosanquet B., Knowledge and Reality, London 1885.
• Bosanquet B., Logic or the Morphology of Knowledge, t. 1‑2, Oxford 1888.
• Bosanquet B., The Philosophical Theory of the State, London 1899.
• Bosanquet B., Psychology of the Moral Self, London–New York 1897.
• Bosanquet B., The Reality of the General Will, [w:] Aspects of the Social Problem, red. tenże, London 1895.
• Bosanquet B., Some Suggestions in Ethics, London 1918.
• Bosanquet B., Three Lectures on Aesthetic, London 1923.
• Bosanquet B., The Value and Destiny of the Individual. The Gifford Lectures for 1912 Delivered in Edinburgh University, London 1913.
• Bosanquet B., What Religion Is, London 1931.
• Bosanquet H. D., Bernard Bosanquet. A Short Account of His Life, London 1924.
• Boucher D., British Idealism, the State and International Relations, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 1994, Vol. 55, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F2709928.
• Bradley F. H., Ethical Studies, Oxford 1959.
• Broad C. D., The Notion of a General Will, „Mind” 1919, Vol. 28, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fmind%2FXXVIII.4.502.
• Cole G. D. H., Conflicting Social Obligations, „Proceedings of Aristotelian Society” 1914‑1915, Vol. 16.
• Cole G. D. H., Essays in Social Theory, London 1950.
• Cole G. D. H., The Nature of The State in Its Internal Relations, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series” 1915‑1916, Vol. 16.
• Cole G. D. H., Social Theory, New York 1920.
• Collini S., Hobhouse, Bosanquet and the State. Philosophical Idealism and Political Argument in England 1880‑1918, „Past and Present” 1976, Vol. 72, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fpast%2F72.1.86.
• Collini S., Sociology and Idealism in Britain 1880‑1920, „European Journal of Sociology” 1978, Vol. 19, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2FS0003975600005105.
• Dunning W. A., Review. The Philosophical Theory of the State, „Political Science Quarterly” 1899, Vol. 14.
• Dyle S. W., Review. The Philosophical Theory of the State, „Philosophical Review” 1900, Vol. 9.
• Gaus G. F., Bosanquet’s Communitarian Defense of Economic Individualism. A Lesson in the Complexities of Political Theory, [w:] The New Liberalism. Reconciling Liberty and Community, red. A. Simhony, D. Weinstein, Cambridge–New York 2001.
• Gibbon J., Review. The Philosophical Theory of the State, „International Journal of Ethics” 1899‑1900, Vol. 10.
• Ginsberg M., Is There a General Will?, „Proceedings of Aristotelian Society” 1920, Vol. 20.
• Green T. H., Lecture on Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract, [w:] tenże, Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, red. P. Harris, J. Morrow, Cambridge 1986.
• Green T. H., Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation, [w:] tenże, Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, red. P. Harris, J. Morrow, Cambridge 1986.
• Green T. H., Prolegomena to Ethics, London 1883.
• Griffin C. M., L. T. Hobhouse and the Idea of Harmony, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 1974, Vol. 35, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F2709091.
• Grygieńć J., Prawne zobowiązania a obowiązki moralne w filozofii politycznej Thomasa Hilla Greena, „Dialogi Polityczne” 2007, nr 7.
• Hegel G. W. F., Zasady filozofii prawa, przeł. A. Landman, Warszawa 1969, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
• Hobhouse L. T., Competitive and Social Value, „Economica” 1924, nr 12, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F2548107.
• Hobhouse L. T., Democracy and Reaction, London 1904.
• Hobhouse L. T., Development and Purpose. An Essay towards a Philosophy of Evolution, London 1913.
• Hobhouse L. T., The Elements of Social Justice, New York 1922.
• Hobhouse L. T., The Ethical Basis of Collectivism, „International Journal of Ethics” 1898, Vol. 8, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F205585.
• Hobhouse L. T., The Labour Movement, New York 1912.
• Hobhouse L. T., Liberalism, New York 1911.
• Hobhouse L. T., Liberalism, [w:] tenże, Liberalism and Other Writings, red. J. Meadowcroft, Cambridge 1994.
• Hobhouse L. T., Liberalizm, [w:] B. Sobolewska, M. Sobolewski, Myśl polityczna XIX i XX w. Liberalizm, Warszawa 1978.
• Hobhouse L..T., The Metaphysical Theory of The State, London 1918.
• Hobhouse L..T., Mind in Evolution, London 1901.
• Hobhouse L..T., Morals in Evolution. A Study in Comparative Ethics, New York 1906.
• Hobhouse L. T., Questions of War and Peace, London 1916.
• Hobhouse L. T., The Rational Good, New York 1921.
• Hobhouse L. T., Social Evolution and Political Theory, New York 1911.
• Hobhouse L. T., The Theory of Knowledge. A Contribution to Some Problems of Logic and Metaphysics, London 1896.
• Hobhouse L. T., The World in Conflict, London 1915.
• Joad C. E. M., Guide to the Philosophy of Morale and Politics, London 1938.
• Laski H. J., Bosanquet’s Theory of General Will, „Proceedings of Aristotelian Society” 1928, Vol. 8, Supplement.
• Laski H. J., A Grammar of Politics, London 1925.
• Laski H. J., The State in Theory and Practice, New York 1935.
• Laslett P., Introduction, [w:] Philosophy, Politics and Society. First Series, red. P. Laslett, W. G. Runciman, Oxford 1956.
• Lindsay A. D., Bosanquet’s Theory of the General Will, „Proceedings of Aristotelian Society” 1928, Vol. 8, Supplement.
• Lindsay A. D., The Modern Democratic State, London 1959.
• MacIver R. M., Community. A Sociological Study, London 1917.
• MacIver R. M., The Modern State, Oxford 1926.
• Marcuse H., Rozum i rewolucja. Hegel a powstanie teorii społecznej, przeł. D. Petsch, Warszawa 1966.
• Mariz G., L. T. Hobhouse as a Theoretical Sociologist, „Albion. A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies” 1974, Vol. 6, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F4048201.
• McBriar A. M., An Edwardian Mixed Doubles. The Bosanquets and the Webbs. A. Study in British Social Policy, 1890‑1929, Oxford 1987.
• Meadowcroft J., Conceptualizing the State. Innovation and Dispute in British Political Thought 1880‑1914, Oxford 1995.
• Mingardi A., Herbert Spencer, London–New York 2001.
• Morrow J., British Idealism, „German Philosophy” and the First World War, „Australian Journal of Politics and History” 1982, Vol. 28, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467‑8497.1982.tb00117.x.
• Muirhead J. H., Recent Criticism of the Idealist Theory of the General Will, „Mind” 1924, Vol. 33, nr 130, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fmind%2FXXXIII.130.166.
• Nicholson P. P., Political Philosophy of the British Idealists. Selected Studies, Cambridge 1990.
• Pfannenstill B., Bernard Bosanquet’s Philosophy of the State. A Historical and Systematical Study, Lund 1936.
• Plamenatz J. P., Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation, London–New York 1968.
• Rousseau J.‑J., Umowa społeczna, przeł., wstęp i przypisy A. Peretiatkowicz, Kęty 2002, Biblioteka Europejska.
• Sabine G. H., Bosanquet’s Theory of the General Will, „Philosophical Review” 1923, Vol. 32.
• Seaman J. W., L. T. Hobhouse and the Theory of „Social Liberalism”, „Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne do science politique” 1978, Vol. 11, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2FS0008423900046606.
• Simhony A., T. H. Green’s Complex Common Good: between Liberalism and Communitarianism [w:] The New Liberalism. Reconciling Liberty and Community, red. A. Simhony, D. Weinstein, Cambridge–New York 2001.
• Spencer H., Jednostka wobec państwa, przeł. A. Bosiacki, Warszawa 2002, Klasycy Myśli Prawnej.
• Strauss L., Prawo naturalne w świetle historii, przeł. T. Górski, Warszawa 1969.
• Sweet W., Idealism and Rights. The Social Ontology of Human Rights in the Political Thought of Bernard Bosanquet, Lanham 1997.
• Taylor A. E., Critical Notice of Hobhouse’s Metaphysical Theory of the State, „Mind” 1920, Vol. 29.
• Thakurdas F., Rousseau and the Concept of the General Will. The Pursuit of an Elusive Concept, Calcutta 1976.
• Vincent A., Plant R., Philosophy, Politics and Citizenship. The Life and Thought of the British Idealists, Oxford 1984.
• Voegelin E., Nowa nauka polityki, przeł. i wstęp P. Śpiewak, Warszawa 1992, Biblioteka Aletheia.
• Watson J., Review. The Philosophical Theory of the State, „Queen’s Quarterly” 1900, Vol. 7.
• Weinstein D., The New Liberalism of L. T. Hobhouse and the Reenvisioning of Nineteenth‑Century Utilitarianism, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 1996, Vol. 57, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307%2F3653951.
• Weinstein D., Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism, Cambridge 2007.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.10.2013.26.04