Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2010 | 15 | 1 | 103-118
Tytuł artykułu

Does “One Cannot Know” Entail “Everyone is Right?” The Relationship between Epistemic Scepticism and Relativism

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The objective of the paper is to seek clarification on the relationship between epistemic relativism and scepticism. It is not infrequent to come across contemporary discussions of epistemic relativism that rely upon aspects of scepticism and, vice versa, discussions of scepticism drawing upon aspects of relativism. Our goal is to highlight the difference(s) between them by illustrating (1) that some arguments thought to be against relativism are actually against scepticism, (2) that there are different ways of understanding the relationship between relativism and scepticism, and (3) that a commitment to either relativism or scepticism does not entail commitment to the other. The paper focuses upon the works of Peter Unger and Paul Boghossian to show how this terrain can be variously conceived and to illustrate that Boghossian's conception of the landscape is incorrect.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
15
Numer
1
Strony
103-118
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2010
Twórcy
autor
  • Virginia State University
  • Virginia State University
Bibliografia
  • Boghossian, Paul Artin. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
  • Burnyeat, M. F. “Can the Sceptic Live his Scepticism?” In Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, edited by Malcolm Schofield, Myles Burnyeat, and Jonathan Barnes, 20–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
  • Feyerabend, Paul. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso, 1987.
  • Fumerton, Richard A. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.
  • Harré, Rom, and Michael Krausz. Varieties of Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
  • Scanlon, Thomas M. What We Owe To Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
  • Sedley, David. “The Protagonists.” In Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, edited by Malcolm Schofield, Myles Burnyeat, and Jonathan Barnes, 1–19. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
  • Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Translated by Robert Gregg Bury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933.
  • Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism. Translated by Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • Unger, Peter, K. Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
  • Unger, Peter K. Philosophical Relativity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
URI
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=53739336&lang=pl&site=ehost-live
URI
http://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=forphil&id=forphil_2010_0015_0001_0103_0118
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.desklight-6b845075-b2ec-43fd-aea6-967106c54bd1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.