Bośniacko-hercegowińska etnonacjonalna polityka w kontekście ustroju i przyszłości państwa

• Autorzy: Zekić Marinko

Warianty tytułu

EN

The Ethno‑politics and the Status of the Sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The underlying aim of the article is to contribute to the understanding the relation between ethnic claims and policies which determine social relations in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the debate on the current constitutional crisis in this country. The present ethno‑political regime heavily depends on the perpetual crisis as the primary source of political articulation and action. Though the Dayton Accords ended war and established peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the agreement did not create a functional central government, lacking the capacity to undertake the reforms needed to meet the terms of accession to the European Union. The peace treaty designed future state structures around the very ethnic‑based power struggles that shaped the conflict. As a result, ethnic‑based politics continued to dominate political space. These politics, combined with high levels of international oversight have distorted the state building process, and reduced democratization efforts. Today, Bosnia’s future is still uncertain. Political squabbles have seriously detracted from Bosnia’s ability to engage in reforms needed to boost its economy and move closer to the EU. Conflicting ambitions of national party leaders is an important factor in this failure. Representatives of an ethnic group can veto any decision that they feel does not accord with their interests. This means in effect that all major decisions have to be made by consensus among the main ethnic parties, which is often very difficult since they have fundamentally different views on Bosnia’s future. Although Bosnia and Herzegovina is currently not in danger of being dismembered, awareness that the country cannot survive without multi‑ethnic collaboration should remain one of the guiding principles for Bosnia’s ruling ethnically‑based political parties.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Bosnia and Herzegovina; multiculturalism; ethnopolitics; political elites; ethnic conflict; Dayton Peace Agreement; state building process; democratization; European integration

• Wydawca: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Czasopismo: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Rocznik: 2014
• Numer: 5(31/1)
• Strony: 523-538

Twórcy

autor

Zekić Marinko

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Altermatt U., Sarajewo przestrzega. Etnonacjonalizm w Europie, przeł. G. Sowiński, Kraków 1998, Biblioteka Myśli Politycznej.
• Babić M., Węzeł gordyjski: 15 lat daytonowskiej Bośni i Hercegowiny, [w:] Bośnia i Hercegowina 15 lat po Dayton. Przeszłość – teraźniejszość – perspektywy. Studia i szkice, red. P. Chmielewski, S.L. Szczesio, Łódź 2011, Bałkany XX/XXI.
• Bałkany Zachodnie a integracja europejska. Perspektywy i implikacje, Warszawa 2008, Urząd Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej, [online] https://polskawue.gov.pl/files/Dokumenty/Publikacje_o_UE/UKIE_Balkany_PL.pdf.
• Banović D., Gavrić S., Ustavna reforma u Bosni i Hercegovini, „Politička Misao” 2010, nr 2.
• Fakti: Rezultati ankete: građani ne vjeruju institucijama vlasti i političkim partijama u Bosni i Hercegovini novembar 2013. godine, Analitika – centar za društvena istraživanja, [online]http://www.analitika.ba/sites/default/files/publikacije/fact_attitudes_of_citizens_13nov2013.pdf.
• Federalny Urząd Statystyczny, Bośnia i Hercegowina, Federacja Bośni i Hercegowiny, Spis ludności 1999, [online] http://www.fzs.ba/popis.htm#_POPIS STANOVNIŠTVA 1991 I STARIJI.
• Hayden R., From Yugoslavia to the Western Balkans. Studies of a European Disunion, 1991‑2011, Boston 2012, Balkan Studies Library, 7.
• Hodžić K., Hasanović I., Neriješena ustavna pitanja u svjetlu kontraverzi i neslaganja o državnom uređenju i fiskalnom sistemu Bosne i Hercegovine. Društveni ogledi, „Časopis za Pravnu Teoriju i Praksu” 2014, nr 1.
• Human Rights Papers, Paper 3: Alternativni izvještaj o napretku 2014: politički kriteriji, Sarajevo 2014, Inicijativa za monitoring evropskih integracija Bosne i Hercegovine, [online] http://adi.org.ba/wp‑content/uploads/2014/07/Alternativni‑izvjestaj‑2014_BHS_za‑web.pdf.
• Imamović M., Osnove upravno‑političkog razvitka i državnopravnog položaja Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 2006.
• Izvještaj o ispunjenosti predizbornih obećanja partija na vlasti u Bosni i Hercegovini u mandatu 2010‑2014 [Sprawozdanie z realizacji obietnic wyborczych partii rządzącej w Bośni i Hercegowinie w kadencji 2010‑2014], UG „Zašto ne”, [online] http://istinomjer.ba/im3/wp‑content/uploads/2014/09/Izvje%C5%A1taj‑o‑ispunjenosti‑predizbornih‑obe%C4%87anja‑partija‑na‑vlasti‑u‑Bosni‑i‑Hercegovini‑u‑mandatu‑2010‑2014.‑partije.pdf.
• Krysieniel K., Między Dayton a Brukselą. Perspektywy transformacji, [w:] Bośnia i Hercegowina 15 lat po Dayton. Przeszłość – teraźniejszość – perspektywy. Studia i szkice, red. P. Chmielewski, S.L. Szczesio, Łódź 2011, Bałkany XX/XXI.
• Malcolm N., Povijest Bosne. Kratki pregled, Zagreb–Sarajevo 1995, Erasmus: Svjedočanstva.
• Mehmedić S., Opći izbori 2010 – Demokratski napredak ili dalje slabljenje države?, Sarajevo 2011, Centar za Sigurnosne Studije, Policy Brief, [online] http://www.css.ba/wp‑content/uploads/2011/06/images_docs_opci_izbori%202010.pdf.
• Nešković R., Nedovršena država. Politički sistem Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 2013.
• Nezavršeni mir. Potreba za dugoročnom strategijom u Bosni i Hercegovini, Nansen Dijalog Centar Sarajevo, Saferworld, 2010, [online] http://ndcsarajevo.org/files/Nezavrseni%20mir%20HR.pdf.
• Opći izbori 2010. Statistika općih izbora, Agencija za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 2011, [online] http://www.bhas.ba/tematskibilteni/2010_OP_IZB_bh.pdf.
• Preliminarni rezultati Popisa stanovništva, domaćinstava i stanova u Bosni i Hercegovini 2013, Agencija za statistiku BiH, [online] http://www.bhas.ba/obavjestenja/Preliminarni_rezultati_bos.pdf.
• Sahadžić M., Priroda političkog sistema u Bosni i Hercegovini, [w:] Uvod u politički sistem Bosne i Hercegovine. Izabrani aspekti, red. S. Gavrić, D. Banović, Ch. Krause, Sarajevo 2009.
• Sarajlić‑Maglić D., EU politika demokratizacije u BiH – Ispravni principi, pogrešne politike, Program podrške istraživanjima u oblasti javnih politika 2007‑2008, [online] http://civilnodrustvo.ba/files/docs/EU_politika_demokratizacije_u_BiH.pdf.
• Strategija za Bosnu i Hercegovinu, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, [online] http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/country/strategy/bosnia‑herzegovina‑draft‑local.pdf.
• Thorsten G., Daytonski sporazum za Bosnu i Hercegovinu, [w:] Uvod u politički sistem Bosne i Hercegovine. Izabrani aspekti, red. S. Gavrić, D. Banović, Ch. Krause, Sarajevo 2009.
• Utvrđeni rezultati općih izbora 2014 godine, Predsjedništvo BiH, 27 X 2014, [online] http://www.izbori.ba/Utvrdjeni2014/Finalni/PredsjednistvoBiH/Default.aspx.
• Walkiewicz W., Periodyzacja: 5 – 10 – 15, czyli etapy nieimplementacji Dayton, [w:] Bośnia i Hercegowina 15 lat po Dayton. Przeszłość – teraźniejszość – perspektywy. Studia i szkice, red. P. Chmielewski, S.L. Szczesio, Łódź 2011, Bałkany XX/XXI.
• Sistem ranog upozoravanja, UNDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, [online] http://issuu.com/unitednations_bih/docs/ews_bih_final.
• The Silent Majority Speaks: Snapshots of Today and Visions of the Future of Bosnia and Herzegovina, UNDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajewo 2000, [online] http://www.ba.undp.org/content/bosnia_and_herzegovina/en/home/library/democratic_governance/the‑silent‑majority‑speaks.html.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.31-1.27