Razem czy osobno? Przegląd badań nad edukacją zróżnicowaną ze względu na płeć

• Autorzy: Koniewski Maciej , Mazelanik Robert

Warianty tytułu

Together or apart? A research review on the continuing controversy of the effectiveness of single-sex education

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Edukacja zróżnicowana ze względu na płeć budzi wiele kontrowersji wśród polityków, rodziców, nauczycieli, a także badaczy edukacyjnych. Niestety dyskusja na temat jej ewentualnych przewag nad szkolnictwem koedukacyjnym, w obliczu niepewnych dowodów naukowych, została zdominowana ideologicznie i do dziś taką pozostaje. W artykule zidentyfikowano problemy definicyjne, które utrudniają prowadzenie dyskusji nad efektywnością edukacji zróżnicowanej ze względu na płeć. W neutralny sposób, oczyszczone z nieścisłości i pozamerytorycznych treści, zostały przedstawione argumenty wysuwane zarówno przez zwolenników, jak i przeciwników tego, uważanego za kontrowersyjny, sposobu organizacji nauczania.

EN

Single-sex education provokes many controversies among policy makers, parents, teachers, as well as education researchers. Unfortunately, the discussion about its potential advantages over coeducational schooling, in light of uncertain empirical evidence, has been ideologically dominated and remains this way to date. This article identifies definitional problems, which hinder effective discussions on the issue of single-sex education. Arguments proposed by advocates and opponents of this form of education are outlined in a neutral way, focusing on their merits rather than on their ideological grounds.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

socjologia edukacji; badania edukacyjne; edukacja zróżnicowana ze względu na płeć; koedukacja; polityka oparta na dowodach

EN

sociology of education; educational research; single-sex education; coeducation; evidence-based policy

• Wydawca: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych
• Czasopismo: Edukacja
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: 3(2017)
• Strony: 20–36

Twórcy

autor

Koniewski Maciej

• Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

autor

Mazelanik Robert

• Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Bibliografia

• ACLU (2012). Preliminary findings of ACLU “Teach Kids, Not Stereotypes” campaign. New York: American Civil Liberties Union.
• Bracey, G. W. (2006). Separate but superior? A review of issues and data bearing on single-sex education. East Lansing: The Great Lakes Center for Education Research & Practice.
• Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
• Cooray, A. i Potrafke, N. (2011). Gender inequality in education: political institutions or culture and religion? European Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 268–280.
• Dunning, T. (2008). Improving causal inference: strengths and limitations of natural experiments. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 282–293.
• Eisenkopf, G., Hessami, Z., Fischbacher, U. i Ur-sprung, H. W. (2015). Academic performance and single-sex schooling: evidence from a natural experiment in Switzerland. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 123–143.
• Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., … Martin, C. L. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333(6050), 1706–1707.
• Harker, R. (2000). Achievement, gender and the single-sex/coed debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(2), 203–218.
• Jakson, C. K. (2012). Single-sex schools, student achievement, and course selection: evidence from rule-based student assignments in Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Public Economics, 96(1–2), 173–187.
• Jackson, C. K. (2016). The effect of single-sex education on test scores, school completion, arrests, and teen motherhood: evidence from school transitions (Working Paper nr w22222). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Klein, S., Lee, J., McKinsey, P. i Archer, C. (2014). Identifying US K-12 public schools with deliberate sex segregation. Arlington: Feminist Majority Foundation.
• Kwak, D. W. i Ku, H. (2013). Together or separate: disentangling the effects of single-sex schooling from the effects of single-sex schools (Working Paper nr 487). Pobrano z http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/abstract/487.pdf
• LePore, P. C. i Warren, J. R. (1997). A comparison of single-sex and coeducational Catholic secondary schooling: evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. American Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 485–511.
• Levin, H. M. (1976). Concepts of economic efficiency and educational production. W: J. T. Froomkin, D. T. Jamison i Radner, R. (red.), Education as an industry (s. 149–198). Pobrano z http://www.nber.org/chapters/c4491.pdf
• Liben, L. S. (2015). Probability values and human values in evaluating single-sex education. Sex Roles, 72(9–10), 401–426.
• Mael, F., Alonso, A., Gibson, D., Rogers, K. i Smith, M. (2005). Single-sex versus coeducational schooling: a systematic review. Pobrano z http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/other/single-sex/single-sex.pdf
• Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W. i Hau, K. T. (2013). Effects of single-sex schooling in the final years of high school: a comparison of analysis of covariance and propensity score matching. Sex Roles, 69(7–8), 404–422.
• OECD (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S. i Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1042–1072.
• Park, H., Behrman, J. R. i Choi, J. (2013). Causal effects of single-sex schools on college entrance exams and college attendance: random assignment in Seoul high schools. Demography, 50(2), 447–469.
• Riordan, C. H. (2015). Single-sex schools: a place to learn. Lanham–London: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Signorella, M. L., Hayes, A. R. i Li, Y. (2013). A meta-analytic critique of Mael et al.’s (2005) review of single-sex schooling. Sex Roles, 69(7–8), 423–441.
• Signorella, M. L. i Bigler, R. S. (2013). Single-sex schooling: Bridging science and school boards in educational policy. Sex Roles, 69(7–8), 349–355.
• Smithers, A. i Robinson, P. (2006). The paradox of single-sex and co-educational schooling. Buckingham: Carmichael Press.
• Szaleniec, H., Kondratek, B., Kulon, F., Pokropek, A., Skórska, P., Świst, K., ... Żółtak, M. (2015). Porównywalne wyniki egzaminacyjne. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
• Wiseman, A. W. (2008). A culture of (in)equality? A cross-national study of gender parity and gender segregation in national school systems. Research in Comparative and International Education, 3(2), 179–201.

Uwagi

http://www.edukacja.ibe.edu.pl/images/numery/2017/3-2-koniewski-mazelanik-razem-czy-osobno.pdf

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24131/3724.170302