Współczesne konteksty znaczeniowe terminu „niepełnosprawność” – implikacje Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawności i Zdrowia (ICF)

• Autorzy: Stanisława Byra , Magdalena Boczkowska , Marlena Duda

Warianty tytułu

EN

Contemporary contexts of the meaning of the term “disability” – Implications of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

• Języki publikacji: PL EN

Abstrakty

PL

Artykuł zawiera teoretyczną analizę współczesnych kontekstów znaczeniowych terminu „niepełnosprawność”. Wychodząc od pierwotnego modelu medycznego, poprzez model społeczny i biopsychospołeczny, ukazany został proces kształtowania się tego pojęcia. Odwołano się do Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Uszkodzeń, Niepełnosprawności i Upośledzeń oraz jej zmodyfikowanej wersji – Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawnościi Zdrowia. Przybliżone zostało pojęcie niepełnosprawności zawarte w ICF, a następnie w głównej mierze skoncentrowano się na jego różnorodnych kontekstach znaczeniowych. Dokonana w ich obrębie analiza ukazuje złożony charakter samego zjawiska niepełnosprawności, zróżnicowane wymiary jego doświadczania, rolę czynników osobistych i kontekstualnych, a także skomplikowaną naturę powiązań między poszczególnymi komponentami ICF: funkcjonowaniem, niepełnosprawnością i zdrowiem.

EN

The article provides a theoretical analysis of the contemporary contexts of the meaning of the term “disability.” Starting with the original medical model, through the social and biopsychosocial model, it shows the concept development process. Reference is made to the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps and its modified version – the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The article explains the concept of disability included in ICF and focuses mainly on the various contexts of its meaning. The analysis presented in the paper shows the complexity of the phenomenon of disability itself, different dimensions of disability experience, the role of personal and contextual factors, as well as the complex nature of relationships between the individual components of ICF: functioning, disability and health.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

niepełnosprawność; funkcjonowanie; zdrowie; ICF

EN

disability; functioning; health; ICF

• Wydawca: Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej. Wydawnictwo APS
• Czasopismo: Człowiek - Niepełnosprawność - Społeczeństwo
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: 4(34)
• Strony: 15-31

Twórcy

autor

Stanisława Byra

• Instytut Pedagogiki UMCS w Lublinie, ul. Narutowicza 12, 20-004 Lublin; tel. [phone];,

autor

Magdalena Boczkowska

• Instytut Pedagogiki UMCS w Lublinie, ul. Narutowicza 12, 20-004 Lublin; tel. [phone],

autor

Marlena Duda

• Instytut Pedagogiki UMCS w Lublinie, ul. Narutowicza 12, 20-004 Lublin; tel. [phone],

Bibliografia

• Albrecht, G.L., Seelman, K.D., Bury, M. (2001). Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
• Altman, M.B. (2014). Definitions, concepts, and measures of disability. Annals of Epidemiology,24(1), 2–7.
• Badley, E.M. (2008). Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation componentsof the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Social Scienceand Medicine, 66, 2335–2345.
• Bickenbach, J. (2013). Disability, “being unhealthy”, and right to health. Human Rights and Disability,4, 821–828.
• Bruyére, S.M., Peterson, D.B. (2005). Introduction to special section on the International Classificationof Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): Implications for rehabilitation psychology.Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 103–104.
• Chiu, H.-Ch., Ada, L., Butler, J., Coulson, S. (2010). Relative contribution of motor impairments tolimitations in activity and restrictions in participation in adults with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.Clinical Rehabilitation, 24, 454–462.
• Crow, L. (1996). Including all for our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. W: C. Barnes,G. Mercer (red.), Exploring the Divide (s. 55–72). Leeds: The Disability Press.
• Dahl, T.H. (2002). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An introductionand discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. Journal ofRehabilitation Medicine, 34, 201–204.
• Davis, A.M., Perruccio, A.V., Ibrahim, S., Hogg-Johnson, S., Wong, R., Badley, E.M. (2012).Understanding recovery: Changes in the relationships of the International Classification ofFunctioning (ICF) components over time. Social Science and Medicine, 75, 1999–2006.
• Dixon, D., Johnston, M., Elliott, A., Hannaford, P. (2012). Testing integrated behavioural andbiomedical models of activity and activity limitations in a population-based sample. Disabilityand Rehabilitation, 34, 1157–1166.
• Emerson, E., Madden, R., Graham, H., Llewellyn, G., Hatton, C., Robertson, J. (2011). The healthof disabled people and the social determinants of health. Public Health, 125, 145–147.
• Falvo, D.R. (2014). Medical and Psychosocial Aspects of Chronic Illness and Disability. Burlington:Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
• Huber, J.G., Sillick, J., Skarakis-Doyle, E. (2010). Personal perception and personal factors: Incorporatinghealth-related quality of life into the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(23), 1955–1965.
• ICF: Międzynarodowa Klasyfikacja Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawności i Zdrowia. (2001). Geneva:Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia.
• Jette, A.M., Tao, W., Haley, S.M. (2007). Blending activity and participation subdomains of theICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(22), 1742–1750.
• Jette, A.M. (2006). Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. PhysicalTherapy, 86(5), 726–734.
• Kearney, P.M., Pryor, J. (2004). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability andHealth (ICF) and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2), 162–170.
• Khan, F., Pallant, J.F. (2007). Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability andHealth (ICF) to describe patient reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification ofrelevant environmental factors. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(1), 63–70.
• Klejn-de Vrankrijker, M.W., de (2006). On health, ability and activity: Comments on some basicnotions in the ICF. Response on some issues raised by Nordenfelt. Disability and Rehabilitation,28(23), 1475–1476.
• Nagi, S. (1965). Some Conceptual Issues in Disability and Rehabilitation. Washington: AmericanSociological Association.
• Nagi, S. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications. W: A. Pope, A. Tarlow (red.), Disabilityin America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention (s. 309–327). Washington: NationalAcademy Press.
• Nazli, A. (2012). “I’m healthy”: Construction of health in disability. Disability and Health Journal,5, 233–240.
• Nordenfelt, L. (2006). On health, ability and activity: Comments on some basic notions in the ICF.Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(23), 1461–1465.
• Parenboom, R.J.M., Wijlhuizen, G.J., Garre, F.G., Heerkens, Y.F., Meeteren, N.L.U., van (2012).An empirical exploration of the relations between the health components of the InternationalClassification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 34,1556–1561.
• Perenborn, R.J.M., Wijlhuizen, G.J., Galindo Garre, F., Heerkens, Y., Meeteren, N.L.U., van(2012). An empirical exploration of the relations between the health components of the InternationalClassification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation,34(18), 1556–1561.
• Peterson, D.B. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An introductionfor rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2), 105–112.
• Peterson, D.B., Kosciulek, J.F. (2005). Introduction to the special issue of Rehabilitation Education:International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). RehabilitationEducation, 19(2–3), 75–80.
• Pollard, B., Johnston, M., Dieppe, P. (2011). Exploring the relationships between InternationalClassification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constructs of impairment, activitylimitation, and participation restriction in people with osteoarthritis prior to joint replacement.BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12(97), 1–8.
• Prince, M., Patel, V., Saxena, S., Maj, M., Maselko, J., Phillips, M.R., Rahman, A. (2007). Nohealth without mental health. Lancet, 8, 859–877.
• Quinn, F., Johnston, M., Dixon, D., Johnston, D.W., Pollard, B., Rowley, D.I. (2012). Testing theintegration of ICF and behavioral models of disability in orthopedic patients: Replication andextension. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57, 167–177.
• Reinhardt, J.D., Miller, J., Stucki, G., Sykes, C., Gray, D.B. (2011). Measuring impact of environmentalfactors on human functioning and disability: A review of various scientific approaches.Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(23–24), 2151–2165.
• Rosenbaum, P., Steward, D. (2004). The World Health Organization International Classification ofFunctioning, Disability, and Health: A model to guide clinical thinking, practice and researchin the field of cerebral palsy. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 1(11), 5–10.
• Rouquette, A., Badley, E.M., Falissard, B., Dub, T., Leplege, A., Coste, J. (2015). Moderators,mediators, and bidirectional relationships in the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health (ICF) framework: An empirical investigation using a longitudinal designand structural equation modeling (SEM). Social Science and Medicine, 135, 133–142.
• Salvador-Carulla, L., Garcia-Gutierrez, C. (2011). The WHO construct of health-related functioning(HrF) and its implications for health policy. BMC Public Health, 11 (Suppl. 4), 59–72.
• Salvador-Carulla, L., Gasca, V.I. (2010). Defining disability, functioning, autonomy and dependencyin person-centered medicine and integrated care. International Journal of IntegratedCare, 10(5), 69–72.
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. The Disability Studies Reader, 2, 197–204.
• Smart, J.F. (2007). The promise of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability andHealth (ICF). W: A.E. Dell Orto, P.W. Power (red.), The Psychological and Social Impact ofIllness and Disability (s. 582–595). New York: NY Springer.
• Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Melvin, J. (2007). The International Classification of Functioning, Disabilityand Health: A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy.Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(4), 279–285.
• Sullivan, K.J., Cen, S.Y. (2011). Model of disablement and recovery: Knowledge translation inrehabilitation research and practice. Physical Therapy, 91, 1892–1904.
• Verbrugge, L.M., Jette, A.M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science Medicine, 38, 1–14.
• Wang, P.P., Badley, E.M., Gignac, M. (2006). Exploring the role of contextual factors in disabilitymodels. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(2), 135–140.
• Whiteneck, G., Dijkers, M.P. (2009). Difficult to measure constructs: Conceptual and methodologicalissues concerning participation and environmental factors. Archives of Physical MedicineRehabilitation, 90 (Suppl. 1), 22–35.
• World Health Organization. (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, andHandicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva:World Health Organization.
• World Health Organization. (1997). International Classification of Impairments, Activities andParticipation: Beta-1 Draft for Field Trials. Geneva: World Health Organization.
• World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, andHealth: Children and Youth Version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/17345537.1233867