Структурно-полевой подход к синтаксической фразеологии русского языка. Часть I

• Autorzy: Pavlova Anna

Warianty tytułu

EN

Structural-field approach to syntactic phraseology of Russian. Part I

• Języki publikacji: RU

Abstrakty

EN

The paper deals with the problems of the structural-field approach to the study of linguistic phenomena. The foundations for building a field theory in the grammatical structure of language were laid by V. G. Admoni in his works on the theoretical grammar of German. Effectively, the same approach can be applied to any language phenomenon as it has a number of advantages over classifications involving the distribution of objects in systems of level hierarchy. The paper demonstrates the advantages and possibilities of the structural-field approach. It aims at studying the field of syntactic phraseological phenomena (phraseme constructions), identifying its core, centre, periphery, and adjacent fields. Phraseme constructions belong to the linguistic system and occupy an important place in construction grammar. They are constantly reproduced in spoken language and filled in with concrete vocabulary. They are stable syntactic models of idiomatic character that are retrieved from memory as whole entities rather than by separate units (the meaning of a filled model cannot be deduced without prior knowledge of its structure and its semantics per se). The properties, namely polyelementality, reproducibility, stable syntactic structure, idiomaticity, fillability in speech, are indispensable characteristics of the phenomenon described herein: deprived of at least one of them, a construction ceases to be a phraseme. However, phraseme constructions have a larger, typical set of characteristics. In this paper, they are viewed from the perspective of an increase and decrease of these characteristics, making the study of phraseological constructions as a field whose structure is determined by multiple axes possible. The structural-field approach waives the need to make clear distinctions between linguistic phenomena with similar functionality at different levels. The use of the field approach and its methodological advantages are explained through the example of the field of syntactic phraseology.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

syntactic idiomatics; syntactic pattern; illocution; prosody; structural-field approach

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 2
• Strony: 361–375

Daty

wydano

2022-12-30

Twórcy

autor

Pavlova Anna

• University of Mainz,

Bibliografia

• АДМОНИ, В. Г. (1979), Структура грамматического значения и его статус в системе языка. В: В. Г. Адмо-ни (ред.), Структура предложения и словосочетания в индоевропейских языках. Ленинград, 6-36. [Admoni, V. G. (1979), Struktura grammaticheskogo znacheniya i yego status v sisteme yazyka. In: Admoni, V. G. (ed.), Struktura predlozheniya i slovosochetaniya v indoyevropeyskikh yazykakh. Lenin-grad, 6-36.] Google Scholar
• БОНДАРКО, А. В. (1983), Принципы функциональной грамматики и вопросы аспектологии. Ленинград. [Bondarko, A. V. (1983), Printsipy funktsional'noy grammatiki i voprosy aspektologii. Leningrad.] Google Scholar
• БОНДАРКО, А. В. (1984), Функциональная грамматика. Ленинград. [Bondarko, A. V. (1984), Funktsio-nal'naya grammatika. Leningrad.] Google Scholar
• ДОБРОВОЛЬСКИЙ, Д. О. (2016), Грамматика конструкций и фразеология. В: Вопросы языкознания, 3, 7-21. [Dobrovol'skiy, D. O. (2016), Grammatika konstruktsiy i frazeologiya. In: Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 3, 7 21.] Google Scholar
• ДОБРОВОЛЬСКИЙ, Д. О. (2017), Грамматика и фразеология: точки пересечения. В: Известия РАН. Серия литературы и языка. 76 (1), 5-14. [Dobrovol'skiy, D. O. (2017), Grammatika i frazeologiya: tochki peresecheniya. In: Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 76 (1), 5-14.] Google Scholar
• ЖИРМУНСКИЙ, В. М. (1968), О природе частей речи и их классификации. В: Жирмунский В. М., Суник, О. П. (ред.). Вопросы теории частей речи (на материале языков различных типов). Ленинград, 7-33. [Zhirmunskiy, V. M. (1968), Oprirode chastey rechi i ikh klassifikatsii. In: Zhirmunskiy V. M., Sunik, O. P. (ed.), Voprosy teorii chastey rechi (na materiale yazykov razlichnykh tipov). Leningrad, 7-33.] Google Scholar
• МЕЛИКЯН, В. Ю. (2004), Современный русский язык. Синтаксис нечленимого предложения. Ростов-на-Дону. [Melikyan, V. Yu. (2004), Sovremennyyrusskiy yazyk. Sintaksis nechlenimogo predlozheniya. Rostov-na-Donu.] Google Scholar
• МЕЛЬЧУК, И. А. (2017), Как... так и...: что это за? В: Русский язык в научном освещении, 1 (33), 67-85. [Mel'chuk, I. A. (2017), Kak...tak i...: chto eto za? In: Russkiy yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 1(33), 67-85.] Google Scholar
• ПАВЛОВ, В. М. (1996), Полевые структуры в строе языка. Ст.-Петербург. [Pavlov, V. M. (1996), Polevyyestruktury v stroye yazyka. St.-Peterburg.] Google Scholar
• ПАВЛОВ, В. М. (1998), Полевой подход и континуальность языковой системы. В: Бондарко, А. В. (ред). Общее языкознание и теория грамматики: Материалы чтений, посвященных 90-летию со дня рож-дения Соломона Давидовича Кацнельсона. Санкт-Петербург, 22-27. [Pavlov, V. M. (1998), Polevoy podkhod i kontinual'nost' yazykovoy sistemy. In: Bondarko, A. V. (ed.), Obshcheye yazykoznaniye i te-oriyagrammatiki: Materialy chteniy, posvyashchennykh 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Solomona Da-vidovichakatsnel'sona. Sankt-Peterburg, 22-27.] Google Scholar
• ПАДУЧЕВА, Е. В. (2011), Отрицание. Материалы для проекта корпусного описания русской грамматики (http://rusgram.ru). Москва. [Paducheva, Ye. V. (2011), Otritsaniye. Materialy dlya proyekta korpusno-go opisaniya russkoy grammatiki. http://rusgram.ru. Moskva.] Google Scholar
• ПАДУЧЕВА, Е. В. (2017), Конструкции с независимым инфинитивом. Материалы для проекта корпусного описания русской грамматики (http://rusgram.ru). Москва. [Paducheva, Ye. V. (2017), Konstruktsii s nezavisimym infinitivom. Materialy dlya proyekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoy grammatiki. http://rusgram.ru Moskva.] Google Scholar
• ШМЕЛЁВ, Д. Н. (1977), Современный русский язык. Лексика. Москва. [Shmelëv, D. N. (1977), Sovremenny-yrusskiy yazyk. Leksika. Moskva.] Google Scholar
• ЩЕРБА, Л. В. (1975), Избранные работы по русскому языку. Москва. [Shcherba, L. V. (1975), Izbrannyye raboty po russkomu yazyku. Moskva.] Google Scholar
• AVGUSTINOVA, T. | IOMDIN, L. (2019), Towards a Typology of Microsyntactic Constructions. In: Computa-tional and Corpus-Based Phraseology. Third International Conference, Europhras 2019, Malaga, Spain, September 25-27 2019, 15-30. Google Scholar
• FEILKE, H. (1994), Common-sense-Kompetenz: Überlegungen zu einer Theorie des „sympathischen“ und „na-türlichen“ Meinens und Verstehens. Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar
• FILLMORE, CH. J. | KAY, P. | O’CONNOR, М. (1988), Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of ‘let alone’. In: Language, 64 (3), 501-538. Google Scholar
• FLEISCHER, W. (1997), Phraseologie der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen. Google Scholar
• GOLDBERG, A. (1995), Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago. Google Scholar
• GOLDBERG, A. (2006), Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York. Google Scholar
• MEL'ČUK, I. (1995), Phrasemes in Language and Phraseology in Linguistics. In: Everaert, M. et al. (eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. Hillsdale, 167-232. Google Scholar
• SAUSSURE, F. (1959), Course in general linguistics. New York. Google Scholar

Identyfikatory

ISSN

2081-1128