Specyfika konstytucjonalizmu stanowego w USA

• Autorzy: Stolicki Dariusz
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The article summarizes major peculiarities of American state constitutionalism, understood as a set of general principles governing form, legal nature, and content of state constitutions. It focuses primarily on the areas in which state constitutions differ from the federal Constitution. With the large difference in length as its starting point, the article analyzes such features of state constitutions as greater level of detail, broader catalog of constitutional subject matters, frequent incidence of constitutional legislation, plenary as opposed to enumerated character of state governmental powers, and relative ease of constitutional change at state level. It concludes that the foregoing features of state constitutions primarily reflect distrust in state governments (particularly legislatures) and willingness of political actors to treat constitutions as ordinary policy instruments as opposed to fundamental law. The article further examines the influence of those features on state constitutional interpretation, noting that the greater specificity and elasticity of state constitutions on one hand diminishes importance of originalism, but on the other hand – promotes strict textualism and is one of the leading causes of lesser incidence on informal constitutional changes (especially judge‑made) in the states.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

United States; state constitutionalism; constitutional subject matters; constitutional interpretation

• Wydawca: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Czasopismo: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: 48
• Strony: 203-239

Twórcy

autor

Stolicki Dariusz

Bibliografia

• Abrahamson S.S., Gutmann D.S., The New Federalism: State Constitutions and State Courts, „Judicature” 1991, Vol. 71.
• Adams B. i in., Environmental and Natural Resources Provisions in State Constitutions, „Journal of Land, Resources & Environmental Law” 2002, Vol. 22.
• Adams W.P., The First American Constitutions. Republican Ideology and the Making of the State Constitutions in the Revolutionary Era, Lanham 2001.
• Alexander K., Alexander M.D.,. American Public School Law, Belmont 2005.
• Allen J.M. III, Hinds J.W., Alabama Constitutional Reform, „Alabama Law Review” 2001, Vol. 53, nr 1.
• Backman J.H., Public Land Law Reform – Reflections from Western Water Law, „Brigham Young University Law Review” 1982, Vol. 1982, nr 1.
• Baude P., Interstate Dialogue in State Constitutional Law, „Rutgers Law Journal” 1997, Vol. 28.
• Biber E., The Price of Admission: Causes, Effects, and Patterns of Conditions Imposed on States Entering the Union, „American Journal of Legal History” 2004, Vol. 46.
• Blackstone W., Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Volumes, red. G. Sharswood, B. Field, Philadelphia 1893.
• Blocher J., Reverse Incorporation of State Constitutional Law, „Southern California Law Review” 2011, Vol. 84, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1653619.
• Blum G. i in., American Jurisprudence, wyd. 2, t. 16A: Constitutional Law, St. Paul 2009.
• The Book of the States, t. 44, red. A.S. Wall, H.M. Perkins, Lexington 2013.
• Braden G.D. i in., The Constitution of the State of Texas. An Annotated and Comparative Analysis, Austin 1977.
• Briffault R., The Disfavored Constitution: State Fiscal Limits and State Constitutional Law, „Rutgers Law Journal” 2003, Vol. 34.
• Briffault R., The Item Veto in State Courts, „Temple Law Review” 1993, Vol. 66.
• Bryce J., The American Commonwealth, Indianapolis 2005.
• Caeser J.W., The Constitution as Political Theory. Between Rationalism and Reverence. 2014 Walter Berns Constitution Day Lecture, Washington 2014, [online] https://www.aei.org/wp‑content/uploads/2014/12/The‑Constitution‑as‑Political‑Theory.pdf.
• Caldeira G.A., The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts, „American Political Science Review” 1985, Vol. 79, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1956126.
• Chayes A., The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, „Harvard Law Review” 1976, Vol. 89, nr 7, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1340256.
• Colantuono M.G., The Revision of American State Constitutions: Legislative Power, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Change, „California Law Review” 1987, Vol. 75, nr 4, [online]http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3480598.
• Collins R.K.L., Galie P.J., Models of Post‑Incorporation Judicial Review: 1985 Survey of State Constitutional Individual Rights Decisions, „Publius. The Journal of Federalism” 1985, Vol. 16, nr 3.
• Conley P.T., Flanders R.G., The Rhode Island State Constitution. A Reference Guide, Westport 2007.
• Cooley T.M., A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations which Rest upon the Legislative Power of the States of the American Union, Boston 1883.
• Cornwell E.E., Goodman J.S., Swanson W.R., State Constitutional Conventions. The Politics of the Revision Process in Seven States, New York 1975.
• Crawford E.T., The Construction of Statutes, Holmes Beach 1999.
• Croley S.P., The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law, „University of Chicago Law Review” 1995, Vol. 62, nr 2.
• Dealey J.Q., Growth of American State Constitutions from 1776 to the End of the Year 1914, Boston 1915.
• Developments in the Law: The Interpretation of State Constitutional Rights, „Harvard Law Review” 1982, Vol. 95, nr 6, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1340746.
• Dinan J.J., The American State Constitutional Tradition, Lawrence 2006.
• Dinan J.J., The Virginia State Constitution. A Reference Guide, Westport 2006.
• Dodd W.F., The Function of a State Constitution, „Political Science Quarterly” 1915, Vol. 30, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2141919.
• Dodd W.F., Implied Powers and Implied Limitations in Constitutional Law, „Yale Law Journal” 1919, Vol. 29, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/786104.
• Dodd W.F., The Revision and Amendment of State Constitutions, Union, NJ 1999.
• Dorf M.C., The Relevance of Federal Norms for State Separation of Powers, „Roger Williams University Law Review” 1998, Vol. 4, nr 1.
• Dragich M., State Constitutional Restrictions on Legislative Procedure: Rethinking Analysis of Original Purpose, Single Subject, and Clear Title Challenges, „Harvard Journal on Legislation” 2001, Vol. 38.
• Easterbrook F.H., Text, History, and Structure in Statutory Interpretation, „Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy” 1994, Vol. 17.
• Elazar D.J., The Principles and Traditions Underlying American State Constitutions, „Publius. The Journal of Federalism” 1982, Vol. 12, nr 1.
• Ely J.H., Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, Mass. 1980.
• Eskridge W.N., Frickey P.P., Cases and Materials on Legislation. Statutes and the Creation of Public Policy, St. Paul 1995.
• Fallon R.H. i in., Hart and Wechsler’s Federal Courts and the Federal System, New York 2003.
• Fino S.P., Judicial Federalism and Equality Guarantees in State Supreme Courts, „Publius. The Journal of Federalism” 1987, Vol. 17, nr 1.
• Fiss O.M., Rendleman D., Injunctions, Mineola 1984.
• Friedelbaum S.H., State Courts and the Separation of Powers: A Venerable Doctrine in Varied Contexts, „Albany Law Review” 1998, Vol. 61, nr 5.
• Friedman D., Applying Federal Constitutional Theory to the Interpretation of State Constitutions: The Ban on Special Laws in Maryland, „Maryland Law Review” 2012, Vol. 71, nr 2.
• Friedman L., The Constitutional Value of Dialogue and the New Judicial Federalism, „Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly” 2000, Vol. 28.
• Fritz Ch.G., The American Constitutional Tradition Revisited: Preliminary Observations on State Constitution‑Making in the Nineteenth‑Century West, „Rutgers Law Journal” 1994, Vol. 25.
• Fritz Ch.G., Book Review: Rethinking the American Constitutional Tradition: National Dimensions in the Formation of State Constitutions, „Rutgers Law Journal” 1995, Vol. 26.
• Gardner J.A., The Failed Discourse of State Constitutionalism, „Michigan Law Review” 1992, Vol. 90, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1289401.
• Gardner J.A., The Positivist Revolution that Wasn’t: Constitutional Universalism in the States, „Roger Williams University Law Review” 1998, Vol. 4, nr 1.
• Gardner J.A., What Is a State Constitution?, „Rutgers Law Journal” 1993, Vol. 24.
• Gelfand M.D., Mintz J.A., Salsich P.W., State and Local Taxation and Finance in a Nutshell, St. Paul 2000.
• Gettleman M.E., The Dorr Rebellion. A Study in American Radicalism, 1833‑1849, New York 1973.
• Goebel T., A Government by the People. Direct Democracy in America, 1890‑1940, Chapel Hill2002.
• Grad F.P., The State Constitution: Its Function and Form for Our Time, „Virginia Law Review” 1968, Vol. 54, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1071895.
• Grad F.P., Williams R.F., State Constitutions for the Twenty‑First Century, t. 2: Drafting State Constitutions, Revisions, and Amendments, Albany 2006.
• Griffin S.M., Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 1990, Vol. 10, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/10.2.200.
• Grossenbacher K., Implementing Structural Injunctions: Getting a Remedy When Local Officials Resist, „Georgia Law Review” 1992, Vol. 80.
• Hamilton A., The Federalist No. 78, [w:] The Federalist Papers, red. G.W. Carey, J. McClellan, Indianapolis 2001.
• Hammons Ch.W., Was James Madison Wrong? Rethinking the American Preference for Short, Framework‑Oriented Constitutions, „American Political Science Review” 1999, Vol. 93, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2586116.
• Harrison J., The Constitutional Origins and Implications of Judicial Review, „Virginia Law Review” 1998, Vol. 84, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1073667.
• Hershkoff H., Positive Rights and State Constitutions: The Limits of Federal Rationality Review,„Harvard Law Review” 1999, Vol. 112, nr 6, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1342383.
• Hershkoff H., State Courts and the „Passive Virtues”: Rethinking the Judicial Function, „Harvard Law Review” 2001, Vol. 114, nr 7, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1342498.
• Hill M.B., The Georgia State Constitution. A Reference Guide, Westport 1994.
• Hoar R.S., Constitutional Conventions. Their Nature, Powers, and Limitations, Boston 1917.
• Holland R.J. i in., State Constitutional Law. The Modern Experience, St. Paul 2010.
• Horwitz M.J., The Transformation of American Law, 1870‑1960. The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy, New York 1992.
• Hurst J.W., The Growth of American Law. The Law Makers, Union, NJ 2001.
• Hutchins W.A., Water Rights Laws in the Nineteen Western States, Washington 1972.
• Johansen R.B., The New Federalism: Toward a Principled Interpretation of the State Constitution, „Stanford Law Review” 1977, Vol. 29, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1228242.
• Journals of the Continental Congress, red. W. Ford, Washington 1904‑1937.
• Kahn P.W., Interpretation and Authority in State Constitutionalism, „Harvard Law Review” 1993, Vol. 106, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1341687.
• Kahn P.W., Legitimacy and History. Self‑Government in American Constitutional Theory, New Haven 1992.
• Kammen M.G., A Machine that Would Go of Itself. The Constitution in American Culture, New Brunswick 2006.
• Keller M., The Politics of State Constitutional Revision, 1820‑1930, [w:] The Constitutional Convention as an Amending Device, red. K.L. Hall, H.M. Hyman, L.V. Sigal, Washington 1981.
• Kennedy R.H., Advisory Opinions: Cautious About Non‑Judicial Undertakings, „University of Richmond Law Review” 1989, Vol. 23, nr 2.
• Kiewiet D.R., Szakaty K., Constitutional Limitations on Borrowing: An Analysis of State Bonded Indebtedness, „Journal of Law, Economics & Organization” 1996, Vol. 12, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023362.
• Killian J.H. i in., The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, S. Doc. No. 108‑17, Washington 2004.
• Kramer L., The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, New York 2004.
• Laidler P., Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Od prawa do polityki, Kraków 2011.
• Langer T., Stany w USA. Instytucje, praktyka, doktryna, Koszalin 1997.
• Leuchtenburg W.E., The Supreme Court Reborn. The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt, New York 1995.
• Levinson L.H., Interpreting State Constitutions by Resort to the Record, „Florida State University Law Review” 1978, Vol. 6.
• Levinson S., Constitutional Faith, Princeton 2011.
• Libonati M.E., The Legislative Branch, [w:] State Constitutions for the Twenty‑First Century, t. 3: The Agenda of State Constitutional Reform, red. G.A. Tarr, R.F. Williams, Albany 2006.
• Libonati M.E., State Constitutions and Legislative Process: The Road Not Taken, „Boston University Law Review” 2009, Vol. 89, nr 2.
• Linde H.A., Are State Constitutions Common Law?, „Arizona Law Review” 1992, Vol. 34.
• Linde H.A., Due Process of Lawmaking, „Nebraska Law Review” 1976, Vol. 55, nr 2.
• Linde H.A., E Pluribus – Constitutional Theory and State Courts, „Georgia Law Review” 1984, Vol. 18.
• Linde H.A., The State and the Federal Courts in Governance: Vive la Difference!, „William and Mary Law Review” 2005, Vol. 46.
• Lutz D.S., Popular Consent and Popular Control. Whig Political Theory in the Early State Constitutions, Baton Rouge 1980.
• Lutz D.S., The Purposes of American State Constitutions, „Publius. The Journal of Federalism” 1982, Vol. 12, nr 1.
• Lutz D.S., Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment, „American Political Science Review” 1994, Vol. 88, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2944709.
• Madison J., The Federalist No. 48, [w:] The Federalist Papers, red. G.W. Carey, J. McClellan, Indianapolis 2001.
• Madison J., The Federalist No. 49, [w:] The Federalist Papers, red. G.W. Carey, J. McClellan, Indianapolis 2001.
• Maltz E.M., Lockstep Analysis and the Concept of Federalism, „Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 1988, Vol. 496.
• Małajny I., Reguła „kwestii politycznych” w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego USA, [w:] Konstytucjonalizm a doktryny polityczno‑prawne.
• Najnowsze kierunki badań, red. R.M. Małajny, Katowice 2008.
• Małajny R.M., Doktryna podziału władzy „Ojców Konstytucji” USA, Katowice 1985.
• Manning J.F., Textualism and the Equity of the Statute, „Columbia Law Review” 2001, Vol. 101, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1123509.
• NettikSimmons D., Towards a Theory of State Constitutional Jurisprudence, „Montana Law Review” 2014, Vol. 46, nr 2.
• Permaloff A., Methods of Altering State Constitutions, „Cumberland Law Review” 2003, Vol. 33.
• Persky J.D., „Ghosts That Slay”: A Contemporary Look at State Advisory Opinions, „Connecticut Law Review” 2004, Vol. 37.
• Peters E.A., Getting Away from the Federal Paradigm: Separation of Powers in State Courts, „Minnesota Law Review” 1997, Vol. 81.
• Peters E.A., Review: State Constitutional Law: Federalism in the Common Law Tradition: Developments in State Constitutional Law by Bradley D. McGraw, „Michigan Law Review” 1986, Vol. 84, nr 4/5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1288831.
• Pope J.G., An Approach to State Constitutional Interpretation, „Rutgers Law Journal” 1993, Vol. 24.
• Pottorff J.F., Political Stew: Item Veto Issues Bubbling to the Top in State Court Jurisdictions, „Emerging Issues in State Constitutional Law” 1988, Vol. 1.
• Prakash S., Yoo J.C., The Origins of Judicial Review, „University of Chicago Law Review” 2003, Vol. 70.
• Reed D.S., Twenty‑Five Years after Rodriguez: School Finance Litigation and the Impact of the New Judicial Federalism, „Law & Society Review” 1998, Vol. 32, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/827752.
• Rendleman D., Complex Litigation. Injunctions, Structural Remedies and Contempt, New York 2010.
• Rosenthal A., The State of State Legislatures: An Overview, „Hofstra Law Review” 1983, Vol. 11.
• Rubin D.F., Constitutional Aid Limitation Provisions and the Public Purpose Doctrine, „Saint Louis University Public Law Review” 1993, Vol. 12.
• Ruud M.H., „No Law Shall Embrace More than One Subject”, „Minnesota Law Review” 1958, Vol. 42.
• Scalia A,, The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers, „Suffolk University Law Review” 1983, Vol. 17.
• Schapiro R.A., Contingency and Universalism in State Separation of Powers Discourse, „Roger Williams University Law Review” 1998, Vol. 4, nr 1.
• Schlam L., State Constitutional Amending, Independent Interpretation, and Political Culture: A Case Study in Constitutional Stagnation, „DePaul Law Review” 1994, Vol. 43, nr 2.
• Schuman D., A Failed Critique of State Constitutionalism, „Michigan Law Review” 1992, Vol. 91, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1289687.
• Shepsle K.A., Congress Is a „They,” Not an „It”: Legislative Intent as Oxymoron, „International Review of Law and Economics” 1992, Vol. 12, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0144‑8188(92)90043‑Q.
• Singer N.J., Singer J.D.S., Sutherland Statutes and Statutory Construction, St. Paul 2008.
• Stern N., The Political Question Doctrine in State Courts, „South Carolina Law Review” 1984, Vol. 35.
• Sturm A.L., The Development of American State Constitutions, „Publius. The Journal of Federalism” 1982, Vol. 12, nr 1.
• Tarr G.A., State Constitutional Design and State Constitutional Interpretation, „Montana Law Review” 2013, Vol. 72.
• Tarr G.A., Understanding State Constitutions, Princeton 1998.
• Tarr G.A., Porter M.C., Introduction: State Constitutionalism and State Constitutional Law, „Publius. The Journal of Federalism” 1987, Vol. 17, nr 1.
• Tarr G.A., Williams R.F., Foreword: Getting from Here to There: Twenty‑First Century Mechanisms and Opportunities in State Constitutional Reform, „Rutgers Law Journal” 2005, Vol. 36.
• Townsend N.J., Single Subject Restrictions as an Alternative to the Line‑Item Veto, „Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy” 1985, Vol. 1, nr 2.
• Wallis J.J., Constitutions, Corporations, and Corruption: American States and Constitutional Change, 1842 to 1852, „Journal of Economic History” 2005, Vol. 65, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022050705050084.
• Wieciech T., Anglosaska formuła politycznego konstytucjonalizmu, Kraków 2014.
• Wieciech T., Ustroje federalne Stanów Zjednoczonych, Kanady i Australii, Kraków 2009.
• Williams R.F., Are State Constitutional Conventions Things of the Past? The Increasing Role of the Constitutional Commission in State Constitutional Change, „Hofstra Law & Policy Symposium” 1996, Vol. 1.
• Williams R.F., The Brennan Lecture: Interpreting State Constitutions as Unique Legal Documents, „Oklahoma City University Law Review” 2002, Vol. 27.
• Williams R.F., Equality Guarantees in State Constitutional Law, „Texas Law Review” 1985, Vol. 63.
• Williams R.F., In the Supreme Court’s Shadow: Legitimacy of State Rejection of Supreme Court Reasoning and Result, „South Carolina Law Review” 1984, Vol. 35, nr 3.
• Williams R.F., The Law of American State Constitutions, New York 2009.
• Williams R.F., On the Importance of a Theory of Legislative Power under State Constitutions, „Quinnipiac Law Review” 1996, Vol. 15.
• Williams R.F., State Constitutional Law. Cases and Materials, Newark 2006.
• Williams R.F., State Constitutional Law Processes, „William and Mary Law Review” 1983, Vol. 24.
• Williams R.F., State Constitutional Limits on Legislative Procedure: Legislative Compliance and Judicial Enforcement, „Publius. The Journal of Federalism” 1987, Vol. 17, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037637.
• Willoughby W.W., The Constitutional Law of the United States, New York 1910.
• Wood G.S., The Creation of the American Republic, 1776‑1787, Chapel Hill 1998.
• Wood G.S., Foreword: State Constitution‑Making in the American Revolution, „Rutgers Law Journal" 1993, Vol. 24.
• Wright Ch.A., Miller A.R., Federal Practice and Procedure, St. Paul 1969‑2012.
• Zwierzchowski K., Amerykańskie instytucje demokracji bezpośredniej, Białystok 2005.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.48.10