Coordination of perception and action in music performance

• Autorzy: Peter Q. Pfordresher

Abstrakty

EN

This review summarizes recent research on the way in which music performance may rely on the perception of sounds that accompany actions (termed auditory feedback). Alterations of auditory feedback can profoundly disrupt performance, though not all alterations cause disruption and different alterations generate different types of disruption. Recent results have revealed a basic distinction between the role of feedback contents (musical pitch) and the degree to which feedback onsets are synchronized with actions. These results further suggest a theoretical framework for the coordination of actions with feedback in which perception and action share a common representation of sequence structure.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

music performance; sequence production; auditory feedback

• Wydawca: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie
• Czasopismo: Advances in Cognitive Psychology
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 2
• Numer: 2-3
• Strony: 183-198

Twórcy

autor

Peter Q. Pfordresher

• Department of Psychology and Institute for Music Research, University of Texas at San Antonio

Bibliografia

• Bangert, M., & Altenmüller, E. O. (2003). Mapping perception to action in piano practice: A longitudinal DC-EEG study.BMC Neuroscience, 4, 26-40.
• Benitez, B. (2005).Effects of Altered Auditory Feedback in Music Performance: The Role of Impulsivity, Musical Aptitude, and General Intelligence.Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
• Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C. & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (1999). Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements.Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 246-258.
• Black J. W. (1951). The effect of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16, 56-60.
• Blakemore, S. J., Goodbody, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Predicting the consequences of our own actions: The role of sensorimotor context esimation.The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7511-7518.
• Boltz, M. & Jones, M.R. (1986). Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does?Cognitive Psychology, 18, 389-431
• Butler, R. A. & Galloway, F. T. (1957). Factorial analysis of the delayed speech feedback phenomenon.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 632-365.
• Chase, R. A. (1965). An information-flow model of the organization of motor activity. I: Transduction, transmission and central control of sensory information.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 140, 239-251.
• Chase, R. A., Harvey, S., Standfast, S., Rapin, I. & Sutton, S. (1961). Studies on sensory feedback I: Effect of delayed auditory feedback on speech and keytapping.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 141-152.
• Cooper, G. & Meyer L. B. (1960).The rhythmic structure of music.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992).The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Costa-Giomi, E. (1999). The effects of three years of piano instruction on children's cognitive developement.Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 198-212.
• Costa-Giomi, E. (2004). Effects of three years of piano instruction on children's academic achievement, school performance, and self-esteem.Psychology of Music, 32, 139-152.
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
• Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.Psychological Review, 85, 341-354.
• Drost, U. C., Rieger, M., Brass, M., Gunter, T. C., & Prinz, W. (2005). Action-effect coupling in pianists.Psychological Research, 69, 233-241.
• Fairbanks, G. & Guttman, N. (1958). Effects of delayed auditory feedback upon articulation.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1, 333-346.
• Finney, S. A. (1997). Auditory feedback and musical keyboard performance.Music Perception, 15, 153-174.
• Finney, S. A. (1999).Disruptive Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Motor Sequencing.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University, Providence, RI.
• Finney, S. A. (2001). FTAP: A Linux-based program for tapping and music experiments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 33, 65-72.
• Finney, S. A. & Palmer, C. (2003). Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect.Memory & Cognition, 31, 51-64.
• Finney, S. A., & Warren, W. H. (2002). Delayed auditory feedback and rhythmic tapping: Evidence for a critical interval shift.Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 896-908.
• Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The nonanomalous nature of anomalous utterances.Language, 47, 27-52.
• Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.)The Psychology of Music2ndEd. (pp. 501-602). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Gabrielsson, A. (2003). Music performance research at the millenium.Psychology of Music, 31, 221-272.
• Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production: Speech and talk(pp. 177-220). London: Academic Press.
• Gates, A., & Bradshaw, J. L. (1974). Effects of auditory feedback on a musical performance task.Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 105-109.
• Gates, A., Bradshaw, J., & Nettleton, N. (1974). Effect of different delayed auditory feedback intervals on a music performance task.Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 21-25.
• Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism.Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
• Hashimoto, Y., & Sakai, K. L. (2003). Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: An fMRI study.Human Brain Mapping, 20, 22-28.
• Havlicek, L. (1968). Effects of delayed auditory feedback on musical performance.Journal of Research in Music Education, 16, 308-318.
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
• Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.Science, 279, 1213-1216.
• Howell, P. (2001). A model of timing interference to speech control in normal and altered listening conditions applied to treatment of stuttering. In B. Massen, W. Julstijn, R. Kent. H. F. M. Peters. & P. H. M. M. Van Lieshout (Eds.)Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered speech(pp. 291-294). Nijmegen: Uttgeverij Vantilt.
• Howell, P. (2004a). Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering.Stammering Research, 1, 34-43.
• Howell, P. (2004b). Assessment of some contemporary theories of stuttering that apply to spontaneous speech.Contemporary Issues in Communicative Sciences and Disorders, 39, 122-139.
• Howell, P. & Archer, A. (1984). Susceptibility to the effects of delayed auditory feedback.Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 296-302.
• Howell, P., Powell, D. J., & Khan, I. (1983). Amplitude contour of the delayed signal and interference in delayed auditory feedback tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 9, 772-784.
• Ivry, R., Diedrichsen, J., Spencer, R., Hazeltin, E., & Semjen, A. (2004). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on bimanual coordination and interferences. In S. Swinnen & J. Duysens (Eds.).Neuro-Behavioral Determinants of Interlimb Coordination(pp. 259-295). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
• James. W. (1890).Principles of psychology(volume 2). New York: Holt.
• Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review, 83, 323-355.
• Jones, M. R. (1987). Dynamic pattern structure in music: Recent theory and research.Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 621-634.
• Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time.Psychological Review, 96, 459-491.
• Jones, M. R. & Holleran, S. (1992).Cognitive bases of musical communication.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Jones, M. R. & Pfordresher, P.Q. (1997). Tracking melodic events using joint accent structure.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 271-291.
• Juslin, P. N. & Sloboda. J. A. (2001).Music and emotion: Theory and research.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kalmus, H. Denes, F., & Fry, D. B. (1955). Effect of delayed acoustic feedback on some nonvocal activities.Nature, 175, 1078.
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995).Dynamic Patterns.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Krampe, R. T., Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Timing, sequencing, and executive control in repetitive movement production.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 379-397.
• Krumhansl, C. L. (1990).Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of muscal keys.Psychological Review, 89, 334-368.
• Krumhansl, C. L. & Shepard, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 579-594.
• Large, E. W. & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review, 106, 119-159.
• Lashley, K. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.)Cerebral mechanisms in behavior(pp. 112-136). New York: Wiley.
• Lehiste, I. (1977). Isochrony reconsidered.Journal of Phonteics, 5, 253-263.
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989).Speaking: From intention to articulation.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Lerdahl, F. & Jackendoff, R. (1983).A Generative Theory of Tonal Music.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Lee, B. S. (1950). Effects of delayed speech feedback.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 824-826.
• Lee, B. S. (1951). Artificial Stutter.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16, 53-55.
• MacKay, D. G. (1968). Metamorphosis of a critical interval: Age-linked changes in the delay in auditory feedback that produces maximal disruption of speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 811-821.
• MacKay, D. G. (1987).The organization of perception and action.New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Müsseler, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event coding account for more equally-ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.)Cognitive Contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events(pp. 121-148). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance.Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115-138.
• Palmer, C., & Drake, C. (1997). Monitoring and planning capacities in the acquisition of music performance skills.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 369-384.
• Palmer, C., & Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Mental representations for musical meter.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 728-741.
• Palmer, C. & Pfordresher, P.Q. (2003). Incremental planning in sequence production.Psychological Review, 110, 683-712.
• Peretz, I., Champod, S., & Hyde, K. (2003). Varieties of musical disorders: the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia.Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 58-75.
• Pfordresher, P.Q. (2003a). Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 949-964.
• Pfordresher, P. Q. (2003b). The role of melodic and rhythmic accents in musical structure.Music Perception, 20, 431-464.
• Pfordresher, P. Q. (2005). Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
• Pfordresher, P. Q. (2006).Relationships between movement trajectories and pitch trajectories in music performance as a basis for perception/action similarity.Manuscript in preparation.
• Pfordresher, P. Q. & Benitez, B. (2006).Temporal coordination of actions and sound during sequence production.Manuscript in preparation.
• Pfordresher, P. Q. & Palmer, C. (2002). Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance.Psychological Research, 66, 71-79.
• Pfordresher, P. Q. & Palmer C. (in press). Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance.Perception & Psychophysics.
• Piedmont, R. L. (1998).The Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Clinical and Research Applications.New York: Plenum Press.
• Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
• Rauscher, F., Shaw, G., Levine, L., Wright, E., Dennis, W., & Newcomb, R. (1997). Music training causes long-term enhancement of preschool children's spatial-temporal reasoning.Neurological Research, 19, 2-8.
• Repp, B. H. (1999). Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance.Music Perception, 16, 409-438.
• Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity: How pianists recognize their own performance.Psychological Science, 15, 604-609.
• Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
• Robinson, G. M. (1972). The delayed auditory feedback effect is a function of speech rate.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 1-5.
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991).Human motor control.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints.Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 110-114.
• Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ.Psychological Science, 15, 511-514.
• Schmidt, R. A. & Lee, T. D. (1999).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.Science, 237, 1317-1323.
• Singer, W. (1993). Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning.Annual Review of Physiology, 55, 349-374.
• Sloboda, J. A. (1982). Music performance. In D. Deutsch (Ed.)Psychology of Music.New York: Academic Press.
• Sloboda, J. A. (1985).The Musical Mind.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sloboda, J. A. (2005).Exploring the Musical Mind.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Smith, K. U. (1962).Delayed Sensory Feedback and Behavior.Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
• Thomassen, J. M. (1982). Melodic Accent: Experiments and a tentative model.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1596-1605.
• Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination.American Psychologist, 48, 938-953.
• Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration.Science, 269, 1880-1882.
• Wonderlic, E. (1992).Wonderlic personnel test.Wonderlic, Inc.: Libertyville, IL.
• Yates, A. J. (1963). Delayed auditory feedback.Psychological Bulletin, 60, 213-232.
• Zaal, T. J., Bingham, G. P. & Schmidt, R. C. (2000). Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1209-1220.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10053-008-0054-8