MOŽNOSTI REKONŠTRUKCIE, ANALÝZY A HODNOTENIA ARGUMENTOV

• Autorzy: Bielik Lukáš

Warianty tytułu

EN

Alternative options for reconstructing, analysing and evaluating arguments

• Języki publikacji: SK

Abstrakty

EN

Arguments formulated in a natural or scientific language usually allow for various different reconstructions. Alternative reconstructions may pertain to different approaches to inference and argumentation (such as classical predicate logic, Bayesian epistemology and many others). However, how are we to select one from among various available reconstructions? The paper provides an analysis of three different reconstructions of a particular argument and discusses their pros and cons with respect to several logical and extra-logical properties. Moreover, the three potential selection principles are considered. It is argued that they work adequately only when subjected to a specific aim of the context of argument-reconstruction.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ARGUMENT; ARGUMENT-RECONSTRUCTION; EVALUATION

• Wydawca: Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Filozofia (Philosophy)
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 75
• Numer: 2
• Strony: 91 – 108

Twórcy

autor

Bielik Lukáš

• Katedra logiky a metodológie vied, Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave, Bratislava, Slovak Republic,

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.2.2