Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Karl Popper lamented the prevalence of dogmatic argument in philosophy and commended the kind of critical argument that is found in the sciences. David Miller criticises the uncritical nature of so-called critical thinking because of its attachment to dogmatic arguments. The author expounds and clarifies Popper’s distinction between critical and dogmatic arguments and the background to it. He criticises some errors in Miller’s discussion and he reaffirms the need for philosophers to eschew dogmatic arguments in favour of critical ones.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
9 - 20
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Slate House Hunstan Lane, Old Leake Boston, Lincolnshire, PE22 9RG, United Kingdom, dannyfrederick77@gmail.com
Bibliografia
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-356aa12a-3a04-4e86-b062-62c8aa3ca28b