Site-specific Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part II. Hazard Estimation

• Autorzy: Muthuganeisan, P. , Raghukanth, S. T. G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article presents site-specific probable seismic hazard of the Himachal Pradesh province, situated in a seismically active region of northwest Himalaya, using the ground motion relations presented in a companion article. Seismic recurrence parameters for all the documented probable sources are established from an updated earthquake catalogue. The contour maps of probable spectral acceleration at 0, 0.2, and 1 s (5% damping) are presented for 475 and 2475 years return periods. Also, the hazard curves and uniform hazard response spectrums are presented for all the important cities in this province. Results indicate that the present codal provision underestimates the seismic hazard at cities of Bilaspur, Shimla, Hamirpur, Chamba, Mandi, and Solan. In addition, regions near Bilaspur and Chamba exhibit higher hazard levels than what is reported in literature

Słowa kluczowe

PL

PSHA; GMPE; zagrożenie sejsmiczne; Himalaje

EN

PSHA; GMPE; seismic hazard; Himalaya; site coefficients

• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 64, no. 4
• Strony: 853--884
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Muthuganeisan, P.

• Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

autor

Raghukanth, S. T. G.

• Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India,

Bibliografia

• Ambraseys, N., and R. Bilham (2000), A note on the Kangra Ms = 7.8 earthquake of 4 April 1905, Curr. Sci. India 79, 1, 45-50.
• Ambraseys, N., and D. Jackson (2003), A note on the early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet, Curr. Sci. India 84, 4, 570-582.
• Bansal, B.K., and M. Verma (2013), Science and technology based earthquake risk reduction strategies: The Indian scenario, Acta Geophys. 61, 4, 808-821, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-013-0105-5.
• Bhatia, S.C., R.M. Kumar, and H.K. Gupta (1999), A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions, Ann. Geophys. 42, 6, 1153-1164, DOI: 10.4401/ag-3777.
• Bilham, R., S. Lodi, S. Hough, S. Bukhary, A.M. Khan, and S.F.A. Rafeeqi (2007), Seismic hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: Uncertain past, uncertain future, Seismol. Res. Lett. 78, 6, 601-631, DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.78.6.601.
• Census (1991), Census of India 1991, Directorate of Census Operations, Himachal Pradesh, India.
• Census (2011), Census of India 2011, Directorate of Census Operations, Himachal Pradesh, India.
• Chandel, V.B.S., and K.K. Brar (2010), Seismicity and vulnerability in Himalayas: the case of Himachal Pradesh, India, Geomat. Nat. Hazard. Risk 1, 1, 69- 84, DOI: 10.1080/19475701003643441.
• Cornell, C.A. (1968), Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58, 5, 1583-1606.
• Department of Planning (2003), An overview of planning in Himachal Pradesh, Planning Department, State Government of Himachal Pradesh, India.
• Der Kiureghian, A., and A.H.S. Ang (1977), A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67, 4, 1173-1194.
• Gardner, J.K., and L. Knopoff (1974), Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64, 5, 1363-1367.
• GSI (2000), Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs, Geological Survey of India, Bangalore, India.
• IBC (2009), International Building Code, International Code Council, International Seismological Centre (ISC), Thatcham, United Kingdom, on-line bulletin, available from http://www.isc.ac.uk.
• IS:1893 (2002), Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1 – General provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India.
• Iyengar, R.N., and S. Ghosh (2004), Microzonation of earthquake hazard in Greater Delhi area, Curr. Sci. India 87, 9, 1193-1202.
• Iyengar, R.N., D. Sharma, and J.M. Siddiqui (1999), Earthquake history of India in medieval times, Indian J. History Sci. 34, 3.
• Karan, P.P. (1966), Geographic regions of the Himalayas, Bull. Tibetology 3, 5-26.
• Khattri, K.N., A.M. Rogers, D.M. Perkins, and S.T. Algermissen (1984), A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas, Tectonophysics 108, 1-2, 93-134, DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(84)90156-2.
• Kijko, A. (2004), Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, mmax, Pure Appl. Geophys. 161, 8, 1655-1681, DOI: 10.1007/s00024-004-2531-4.
• Kijko, A., and G. Graham (1998), Parametric-historic procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Part I: Estimation of maximum regional magnitude Mmax, Pure Appl. Geophys. 152, 3, 413-442, DOI: 10.1007/ s000240050161.
• Knopoff, L., and Y. Kagan (1977), Analysis of the theory of extremes as applied to earthquake problems, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 36, 5647-5657, DOI: 10.1029/ JB082i036p05647.
• Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education, 672 pp.
• Kumar, S., S.G. Wesnousky, T.K. Rockwell, D. Ragona, V.C. Thakur, and G.G. Seitz (2001), Earthquake reccurrence and rupture dynamics of Himalayan Frontal Thrust, India, Science 294, 5550, 2328-2331, DOI: 10.1126/ science.1066195.
• Lave, J., D. Yule, S. Sapkota, K. Basant, C. Madden, M. Attal, and R. Pandey (2005), Evidence for a great medieval earthquake (~1100 A.D.) in the Central Himalayas, Nepal, Science 307, 5713, 1302-1305, DOI: 10.1126/science.1104804.
• Mahajan, A.K., V.C. Thakur, M.L. Sharma, and M. Chauhan (2010), Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area, India, Nat. Hazards 53, 3, 443-457, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-009-9439-3.
• McGuire, R.K. (1976), FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis, Open-file Report 76-67, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, USA.
• Milne, J. (1911), A catalogue of destructive earthquakes: A.D. 7 to A.D. 1899, British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, UK, 92 pp.
• Montessus de Ballore, F. (1911), The seismic phenomena in British India and their connection with its geology, Mem. Geol. Surv. India 35, part 3 (reprint).
• Muthuganeisan, P., and S.T.G. Raghukanth (2016), Site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part I. Site-specific ground motion relations, Acta Geophys. 64, 2, 336-361, DOI: 10.1515/acgeo-2016- 0010
• NDMA (2011), Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India, Tech. Report of the Working Committee of Experts (WCE), National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Govt. of India, New Delhi, India.
• Oldham, T. (1883), Catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest times to the end of 1869, Mem. Geol. Surv. India 19, 3, 1-53.
• Parvez, I.A., F. Vaccari, and G.F. Panza (2003), A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas, Geophys. J. Int. 155, 2, 489-508, DOI: 10.1046/ j.1365-246X.2003.02052.x.
• Patil, N.S., J. Das, A. Kumar, M.M. Rout, and R. Das (2014), Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Himachal Pradesh and adjoining regions, J. Earth Syst. Sci. 123, 1, 49-62, DOI: 10.1007/s12040-013-0378-8.
• PMD (2007), Seismic hazard analysis and zonation for Pakistan, Azad-Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMD), Pakistan and NORSAR, Norway.
• Prabhu, M., and S.T.G. Raghukanth (2014), Development of surface level probabilistic seismic hazard map of Himachal Pradesh. In: Proc. 9th Structural Engineers Convention (SEC 2014), 22-24 December 2014, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India.
• Quittmeyer, R.C., and K.H. Jacob (1979), Historical and modern seismicity of Pakistan, Afghanistan, northwestern India, and southeastern Iran, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 69, 3, 773-823.
• Raghukanth, S.T.G. (2011), Seismicity parameters for important urban agglomerations in India, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 9, 5, 1361-1386, DOI: 10.1007/s10518- 011-9265-3.
• Stepp, J.C. (1972), Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Microzonation, Seattle, USA, Vol. 2, 897-909.
• Uhrhammer, R.A. (1986), Characteristics of northern and central California seismicity, Earthq. Notes 57, 1, 21.
• USNRC (1997), USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.165: Identification and characterization of seismic sources and determination of safe shutdown earthquake ground motion, Unites States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C., USA.
• Valdiya, K.S. (1976), Himalayan transverse faults and folds and their parallelism with subsurface structures of North Indian plains, Tectonophysics 32, 3-4, 353-386, DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(76)90069-X.
• Valdiya, K.S. (2002), Emergence and evolution of Himalaya: reconstructing history in the light of recent studies, Prog. Phys. Geog. 26, 3, 360-399, DOI: 10.1191/0309133302pp342ra.
• Wells, D.L., and K.J. Coppersmith (1994), New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 4, 974-1002.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na
działalność upowszechniającą naukę

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/acgeo-2016-0011