Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The primary energy source in developing countries, including Indonesia, is fossil energy. Therefore, evaluating the environmental impact of coal-fired steam power plants is crucial, but limited. Comprehensive scientific analysis is required to develop appropriate alternative measures. This research aims to analyze the life cycle impact of the coal power plant at the gate, including the coal yard, coal crusher, boiler, turbine, and generator, with the functional unit of 1 kWh of electricity produced. This research provides clear recommendations for mitigating emissions from the main contributing units. The analysis reveals the highest impact in the climate change potential category (1.40 × 10-1 kg CO2 eq/kWh), while the smallest impact was recorded in the Eutrophication potential category (7.55 × 10-4 kg PO4 eq/kWh), with no impact on ozone depletion in the stratosphere. The operation of boiler and generator units (gate hotspots) are the main contributors to climate change impacts, including carbon dioxide (9.25 × 10-2 kg CO2 ), sulfur dioxide (8.21 × 10-3 kg SO2 ), and nitrogen dioxide (7.55 × 10-4 kg PO4 ). Alternative programs that may be implemented to reduce emissions include co-firing and installation of flue gas desulfurization and low NOx burner. The findings of this research provide guidance for developing a policy framework to promote more environmentally friendly coal power plants, thereby achieving greater energy sustainability.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
308--321
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Environmental Management Department, Graduate School, Universitas Sriwijaya, Jl. Padang Selasa No. 524 Bukit Besar, Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia, ptriatmojo@gmail.com
autor
- Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Ogan Ilir 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia, febrian.hadinata@yahoo.co.id
autor
- Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Ogan Ilir 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia, tutiindahsari@ft.unsri.ac.id
Bibliografia
- 1. Bakay, M.S., Ağbulut, Ü. 2021. Electricity production based forecasting of greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey with deep learning, support vector machine and artificial neural network algorithms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125324
- 2. Cardoso, J.S., Silva, V., Chavando, J.A.M., Eusébio, D., Hall, M.J. 2022. Numerical modelling of the coal phase-out through ammonia and biomass co-firing in a pilot-scale fluidized bed reactor. Fuel Communications, 10, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfueco.2022.100055
- 3. Dastjerdi, B., Strezov, V., Rajaeifar, M.A., Kumar, R., Behnia, M. 2021. A systematic review on life cycle assessment of different waste to energy valorization technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125747
- 4. Forstner, S.E.U., Murphy, R., Rulkens, W.H. 1997. Air quality control: formation and sources, dispersion, characteristics and impact of air pollutants: measuring methods, techniques for reduction of emissions and regulations for air quality control. Choice Reviews Online, 34(10). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-5695
- 5. Gaete-Morales, C., Gallego-Schmid, A., Stamford, L., Azapagic, A. 2019. Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Chile over a ten-year period. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1499–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.374
- 6. Galimova, T., Ram, M., Bogdanov, D., Fasihi, M., Gulagi, A., Khalili, S., Breyer, C. 2023. Global trading of renewable electricity-based fuels and chemicals to enhance the energy transition across all sectors towards sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 183(June), 113420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113420
- 7. Henriques, C.O., Sousa, S. 2023. A Review on Economic Input-Output Analysis in the Environmental Assessment of Electricity Generation. Energies, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062930
- 8. Kim, H.S., Kasipandi, S., Kim, J., Kang, S.H., Kim, J.H., Ryu, J.H., Bae, J.W. 2020. Current catalyst technology of selective catalytic reduction (Scr) for nox removal in south korea. Catalysts, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010052
- 9. Larki, I., Zahedi, A., Asadi, M., Forootan, M.M., Farajollahi, M., Ahmadi, R., Ahmadi, A. 2023. Mitigation approaches and techniques for combustion power plants flue gas emissions: A comprehensive review. Science of the Total Environment, 903(August), 166108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166108
- 10. Li, X., Han, J., Liu, Y., Dou, Z., Zhang, T. 2022. Summary of research progress on industrial flue gas desulfurization technology. Separation and Purification Technology, 281, 119849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119849
- 11. Li, Z., Jiang, J., Ma, Z., Wang, S., Duan, L. 2015. Effect of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) on fine particle emission from two coal-fired power plants in China. Atmospheric Environment, 120, 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.046
- 12. Liu, Y., Lu, S., Yan, X., Gao, S., Cui, X., Cui, Z. 2020. Life cycle assessment of petroleum refining process: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120422
- 13. Malode, S., Prakash, R., Mohanta, J.C. 2023. A life cycle assessment of coal-fired thermal power plants with post-combustion control techniques: an India scenario. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(39), 90639–90655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28447-3
- 14. Ministry of Environment and Forestry. 2021. Regulation of the Minister of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2021. In Kementrian LHK RI.
- 15. Prakash, J., Agrawal, S.B., Agrawal, M. 2023a. Global Trends of Acidity in Rainfall and Its Impact on Plants and Soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23(1), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-01051-z
- 16. Rahmanta, M.A., Aprilana, A., Ruly, Cahyo, N., Hapsari, T.W.D., Supriyanto, E. 2024. Technoeconomic and environmental impact of biomass co-firing with carbon capture and storage in Indonesian Power Plants. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083423
- 17. Rasheed, R., Javed, H., Rizwan, A., Sharif, F., Yasar, A., Tabinda, A.B., Ahmad, S.R., Wang, Y., Su, Y. 2021. Life cycle assessment of a cleaner supercritical coalfired power plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123869
- 18. Rasheed, R., Yasar, A., Wang, Y., Tabinda, A.B., Ahmad, S.R., Tahir, F., Su, Y. 2019. Environmental impact and economic sustainability analysis of a novel anaerobic digestion waste-to-energy pilot plant in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(25), 26404–26417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05902-8
- 19. Rashid, S.S., Harun, S.N., Hanafiah, M.M., Razman, K.K., Liu, Y.Q., Tholibon, D.A. 2023. Life cycle assessment and its application in wastewater treatment: A brief overview. Processes, 11(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010208
- 20. Somova, E.V., Tugov, A.N., Tumanovskii, A.G. 2023. Modern coal-fired power units for ultrasupercritical steam conditions (Review). Thermal Engineering, 70(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601523020064
- 21. Spath, P.L., Mann, M.K., Kerr, D.R., Marano, J., Ramezan, M. 1999. Life cycle assessment of coalfired power production including contributions on process definition and data acquisition from: Life Cycle Assessment.
- 22. Strezov, V., Cho, H.H. 2020. Environmental impact assessment from direct emissions of australian thermal power generation technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122515
- 23. Svinterikos, E., Zuburtikudis, I., Al-marzouqi, M. 2019. Carbon Nanomaterials for the Adsorptive Desulfurization of Fuels. 2019.
- 24. Thaker, S., Oni, A.O., Gemechu, E., Kumar, A. 2019. Evaluating energy and greenhouse gas emission footprints of thermal energy storage systems for concentrated solar power applications. Journal of Energy Storage, 26(February), 100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.100992
- 25. Wang, Y., Pan, Z., Zhang, W., Borhani, T.N., Li, R., Zhang, Z. 2022. Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review. Environmental Research, 207, 112219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112219
- 26. Yang, B., Wei, Y.-M., Hou, Y., Li, H., Wang, P. 2019. Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage. Applied Energy, 252, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113483
- 27. Yousefi, H., Habibifar, R., Farhadi, A., Hosseini, S.M. 2023. Integrated energy, cost, and environmental life cycle analysis of electricity generation and supply in Tehran, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 97, 104748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104748
- 28. Zhang, H., Wang, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Sun, B., Pan, W.P. 2020. A review on adsorbent/catalyst application for mercury removal in flue gas: Effect of sulphur oxides (SO2 , SO3 ). Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124220
- 29. Zhao, K., Sun, X., Wang, C., Song, X., Wang, F., Li, K., Ning, P. 2021. Supported catalysts for simultaneous removal of SO2 , NOx , and Hg0 from industrial exhaust gases: A review. Chinese Chemical Letters, 32(10), 2963–2974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.023
- 30. Zhao, S., Peng, J., Ge, R., Wu, S., Zeng, K., Huang, H., Yang, K., Sun, Z. 2022. Research progress on selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts for NOx removal from coal-fired flue gas. Fuel Processing Technology, 236(x), 107432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107432
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-e1d556d6-ce55-4cf4-93a6-52298b7d6b8a