Metody oceny monitorów przeznaczonych do prezentacji obrazów medycznych

• Autorzy: Skrzyński, W.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Methods of assessment of medical display devices

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W pracy przedstawiono przegląd metod oceny wybranych parametrów monitorów przeznaczonych do prezentacji obrazów medycznych. Omówiono stosowane klasyfikacje monitorów.

EN

Methods of assessment of selected parameters of medical display devices are presented in the paper. The short discussion of classifications schemes of the displays, is introduced.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

monitory; kontrola jakości; DICOM GSDF

EN

medical display devices; quality control; DICOM GSDF

• Czasopismo: Inżynier i Fizyk Medyczny
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 1, nr 2
• Strony: 45--53
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., il., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Skrzyński, W.

• Centrum Onkologii – Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie w Warszawie, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warszawa,

Bibliografia

• 1. American Association of Physicists in Medicine: AAPM on-line report no. 03. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems, 2005, http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/.
• 2. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes: Commissioning and routine testing of full field digital mammography systems, version 2, 2006, http://www.cancerscreening. nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp-equipment-report-0604.html.
• 3. European Commission: European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, Fourth edition, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg 2006.
• 4. International Atomic Energy Agency: IAEA Human Health Series No. 17: Quality assurance programme for digital mammography, IAEA 2011, http://www-pub.iaea.org/ books/iaeabooks/8560/Quality-Assurance-Programme-for-Digital-Mammography.
• 5. AmericanCollegeofRadiology:Practiceguideline for determinantsof imagequality in digital mammography, ACR 2007, http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/breast/image_quality_digital_mammo.aspx.
• 6. Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 18 lutego 2011 w sprawie bezpiecznego stosowania promieniowania jonizującego dla wszystkich rodzajów ekspozycji medycznej, Dz.U. 11.51.265, 2011. 7. D.S. Brettle: Display considerations for hospital-wide viewing of soft copy images, Br J Radiol, vol. 80, 2007, 503-507.
• 8. R.S. Saunders et al.: Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography, Academic Radiology, vol. 13, 2006, 1317-1326.
• 9. H. Vorkerk et al.: The delineation of target volumes for radiotherapy of lung cancer patients, Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 91, 2009, 455-460.
• 10. C.W. Hurkmans et al.: Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 50, 2001, 1366-1372.
• 11. R. Steenbakkers et al.: Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: A ’Big Brother’ evaluation, Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 77, 2005, 182-190.
• 12. Society of Motion Pictures and Television Engineers (SMPTE): Recommended Practice RP 133‑1999: Specifications for medical diagnostic imaging test pattern for television monitors and hard-copy recording cameras, 1999.
• 13. J.E. Gray et al.: Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras, Radiology, vol. 154, 1985, 519-527.
• 14. European Reference Organisation for Quality Assured Breast Screening and Diagnostic Services, EUREF, http://www.euref.org/.
• 15. E. Samei, S.L. Wright: Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays, Med Phys, vol. 33, 2006, 645-654.
• 16. R.S. Saunders, E. Samei: Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays, Med Phys, vol. 33, 2006, 308-319.
• 17. A.S.Chawla,E.Samei:Ambient illuminationrevisited:Anewadaptation-basedapproach foroptimizingmedical imagingreadingenvironments,MedPhys,vol.34,2007,81-90.
• 18. P.C. Brennan et al.: Ambient lighting: Effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist, AJR AmJ Roentgenol, vol. 188, 2007, W177-W180.
• 19. National Electrical Manufacturers Association: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 14: Grayscale standard display function, 2011, http://medical.nema.org/dicom/.
• 20. P.G.J. Barten: Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 1666, 1992, 57-72.
• 21. M. Yamaguchi et al.: Psychophysical analysis of monitor display functions affecting observer diagnostic performance of CT image on liquid crystal display monitors, Eur Radiol, vol. 15, 2005, 2487-2496.
• 22. K.A. Fetterly, H.R. Blume, M.J. Flynn, E. Samei: Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays, J Digit Imaging, vol. 21, 2008, 193-207.
• 23. M. Matsuyama M et al.: SU-GG-I-50: When should we recalibrate the grayscale standard display function in different ambient lighting conditions?, Med Phys, vol. 37, 2010, 3113.