Silicone attachment for avoidance of bone tissue overloading in single implant-retained denture

• Autorzy: Żmudzki, J. , Chladek, G. , Kasperski, J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The application of single implant-retained dentures (SIDs) is still rare. It seems that the reason of that is the fear of the overloading of a bone tissue around the implant that alone bears the occlusal loads. In this paper, stress level in the bone tissue around the single mini-implant that alone retained the lower denture was investigated. This stress level depends on the denture joint (the attachment) to the implant. Design/methodology/approach: 3D finite element method (FEM) analysis was used in order to determine the transmission of occlusal loads between mucous membrane foundation and the bone tissue around small diameter (1.8 mm) implant. Standard rotationally and axially mobile denture attachments were compared with the laterally compliant silicone attachment. Oblique mastication loads were assumed for the purposes of a better simulation of realistic conditions. Findings: Both types of standard attachments, rotationally and axially mobile, born remarkable values of oblique mastication force. This load results in a high stress in the bone tissue around a single mini-implant, in the area convergent with clinically observed “funnel-shaped” marginal bone loss around the implant neck. The silicone attachment reduced the loading to a level, which did not create any stress that would be dangerous for the bone tissue. Research limitations/implications: In the FEM model a perfect denture adherence to mucous foundation was assumed and a perfect joint between the implant and bone tissue. Further simplification were the linear isotropic characteristics of used materials. Practical implications: The use of single mini-implants requires the highest quality of the alloy and surface finishing due to the risk of fatigue cracks in case of a quickly progressing “funnel-shaped” bone loss. The silicone attachment provided better utilization of the mucous membrane support that significantly improves safety of implant and diminishes the requirements of bone foundation conditions for an implantological treatment. Originality/value: Presented was a possibility to achieve a much more reliable SID by means of used silicone attachment.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

mocowanie protezy; biokompatybilność; implant

EN

denture attachment; biocompatibility; implant

• Czasopismo: Archives of Materials Science and Engineering
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 51, nr 2
• Strony: 107-115
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Żmudzki, J.

autor

Chladek, G.

autor

Kasperski, J.

• Department of Materials Technology, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Krasińkiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] F. Muller, M. Naharro, GE. Carlsson, What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe?, Clinical Oral Implants Research 18 (2007) 2-14.
• [2] J. Okrajni, M. Plaza, S. Ziemba, Computer modelling of the heat flow in surgical cement during endoprosthesoplasty, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 20 (2007) 311-314.
• [3] M.I. MacEntee, J.N. Walton, N. Glick, A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: Three-year results, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 93 (2005) 28-37.
• [4] R. Zagalak, W. Hędzelek, T. Łodygowski, M. Wierszycki, Correlation between bone loss and bone denisity with risk of implant fracture - finite element analysis, Prosthetic Dentistry 6/1 (2005) 3-7.
• [5] W. Chladek, G. Chladek, T. Lipski, J. Margielewicz, J. Żmudzki, Biomechanical Problems Related to Design of Implantological Overdenture Stabilization System, Silesian University of Technology Press, Gliwice, 2008 (in Polish).
• [6] J. Żmudzki, Can typical overdentures attachments prevent from bone overloading around mini-implants?, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 43/2 (2010) 542-55.
• [7] G. Chladek, Durability evaluation of a friction couple intended for implantological stabilization of complete dentures, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics 10/3 (2008) 7-12.
• [8] G. Chladek, A. Mertas, I. Barszczewska-Rybarek, T. Nalewajek, J. Żmudzki, W. Król, J. Łukaszczyk, Antifungal activity of denture soft lining material modified by silver nanoparticles - a pilot study, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12/7 (2011) 4735-4744.
• [9] G. Cordioli, Z. Majzoub, S. Castagna, Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: A five-year prospective study, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 78 (1997) 159-165.
• [10] G.J. Liddelow, P.J. Henry, A prospective study of immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: Preliminary one-year results, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 97 (2007) S126-S137.
• [11] S. Harder, S. Wolfart, C. Egert, M. Kern, Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures - Results of preliminary prospective study, Journal of Dentistry 39 (2011) 656-661.
• [12] Y. Maeda, M. Horisaka, K. Yagi, Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study, Clinical Oral Implants Research 19/3 (2008) 271-275.
• [13] J. Okrajni, M. Plaza, S. Ziemba, Computer modelling of the heat flow in surgical cement during endoprosthesoplasty, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 20 (2007) 311-314.
• [14] W. Chladek, Engineering biomechanics of the mastication organ, Selected Problems, Monograph 165, 2008, 174 (in Polish).
• [15] H. Van Oosterwyck, J. Duyck, J. Vander Sloten, G. Van der Perre, M. De Cooman, S. Lievens, R. Puers, I. Naert, The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants, Clinical Oral Implants Research 9 (1998) 407-418.
• [16] M. Wierszycki, W. Kąkol, T. Łodygowski, Numerical complexity of selected biomechanical problems, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 44/4 (2006) 797-818.
• [17] W. Chladek, S. Majewski, J. Zmudzki, J. Krukowska, The mechanical conditions of the functionality of choosing implant-dentures constructions - model investigations, Implantoprotetyka 2 (2003) 3-10 (in Polish).
• [18] S. Szmukler-Moncler, H. Salama, Y. Reingewirtz, J.H. Dubruille, Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 43 (1998) 192-203.
• [19] H. Van Oosterwyck, J. Duyck, J. Vander Sloten, G. Van der Perre, M. De Cooman, S. Lievens, R. Puers, I. Naert, The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants, Clinical Oral Implants Research 9 (1998) 407-418.
• [20] R. Kenney, MW. Richards, Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 80 (1998) 559-564.
• [21] H.J. Chun, D.N. Park, C.H. Han, S.J. Heo, M.S. Heo, J.Y. Koak, Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32/3 (2005) 193- 205.
• [22] T. Łodygowski, M. Wierszycki, K. Szajek, W. Hędzelek, R. Zagalak, Tooth-implant life cycle design, Computer Methods in Mechanics, Eds. M. Kuczma, K. Wilmanski. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, Advanced Structured Materials 1 (2010) 391-422.
• [23] S.M. Heckmann, M.G. Wichmann, W. Winter, M. Meyer, H.P. Weber, Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area, Part 2: A methodical study using five types of attachment, Clinical Oral Implants Research 12/6 (2001) 640-647.
• [24] N.H.M. Alsabeeha, A.G.T. Payne, R.K. De Silva, W.M. Thomson, Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems, Clinical Oral Implant Research 22 (2011) 330-337.
• [25] J. Żmudzki, Mastication loads affecting the mucosa of the mandibular alveolar region beneath lower denture as assessed by FEM, Journal of Stomatology 11/63 (2010) 711-72.