Risk acceptation principles in transport

• Autorzy: Szymanek, A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zasady akceptowalności ryzyka w transporcie

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper are presented few methodological problems related to valuing and acceptation risk in transport. In this lecture are presented such problems as: 1. philosophical, ethical and practical rules of risk acceptation. 2. ALARP, ALARA, GAMAB, MEM principles in relation to risk in transport.

PL

W artykule przedstawiono kilka problemów metodologicznych dotyczących wartościowania i akceptacji ryzyka w transporcie. W pracy przedstawiono m. innymi takie problemy, jak: 1. filozoficzno-etyczne i praktyczne zasady akceptacji ryzyka. 2. zasady ALARP, ALARA, GAMAB, MEM w odniesieniu do ryzyka w transporcie.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

transport; akceptowalność ryzyka; zarządzanie ryzykiem; bezpieczeństwo transportu

EN

transport; risk acceptation; risk management; safety transport

• Czasopismo: Journal of KONBiN
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: No. 2 (5)
• Strony: 271-290
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Szymanek, A.

• Technical University of Radom. Faculty of Transport Politechnika Radomska. Wydział Transportu 26-600 Radom, ul. Malczewskiego 29

Bibliografia

• 1. Szymanek A., Road safety transport: some methodological reflection's. 10th International Conference "Computer Systems Aided Science, Industry and Transport" TRANSCOMP 2006, Vol. II, p. 361 - 366. Zakopane, 4 - 7 December 2006
• 2. Szymanek A., Bezpieczeństwo i ryzyko w technice. Politechnika Radomska. Radom 2006, sec. V
• 3. Jennergren L. P., Keeney R. L., Metody oceny ryzyka. (w:) Analiza systemowa - podstawy i metodologia. W. Findeisen (red.), PWN, Warszawa, 1985 s. 572
• 4. Ashby F. R. S. The Risk Equations: The Subjective Side of Assessing Risks. New Scientist 1977, vol.74, No. 1052, s. 398-400
• 5. The Tolerability of Risk from Nuclear power Stations. HSE. London 1992.
• 6. Prest A. R., Turvey R., Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Survey. Economic Journal 1965, vol. 75, s. 683-735
• 7. A review of risk control. SVS 1994/27A, VROM, 1995
• 8. Brearly S. A., UK Railways: Using Risk Information in Safety Decision Making. Proceedings of Workshop on Promotion of Technical Harmonization on Risk-Based Decision-Making. Stresa 2000
• 9. Ch. A., Kontovas, Formal Safety Assessment. Critical Review and Future Role. /Diploma Thesis, July 2005/. National Technical University of Athens. School of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering
• 10. Khalil J. Spencer, Traffic Safety: An integrated ALARA approach; ( http://www.bikewalk.org
• 11. Kuhlmann A., Introduction to Safety Science. New York - Berlin - Heidelberg - Tokyo, 1985, s. 430
• 12. A discussion of Risk Tolerance Principles. /By Odd Nordland - wg: http://www.informatics.sintef.no
• 13. Assessing Risk and Setting Targets in Transport Safety Programmes. ETSC Report, Brussels 2003
• 14. CENELEC prR009-004, "Railway applications, Systematic Allocation of Safety Integrity Requirements", March 1999
• 15. The Netherlands Derivation of Safety Targets for the Random Failure of Programmable Vehicle Based System. SafeComp 2000, 25-27 October 2000, Rotterdam
• 16. E. M. El Koursi, Ching-Yao Chan and Wei-bin Hang, Preliminary Hazard analnyses: A case study of advanced Vehicle control and safety system, IEEE, SMC'99, TOKYO, Japan, 12 -15, October 1999, Volume 1V, pp 558-563
• 17. Rumar K. (1999). Road safety and benchmarking. In: Proceedings of the Paris Conference on Transport Benchmarking. November 1999, Paris
• 18. Hauer E. On exposure and accident rate. Traffic Engineering +Control, 36(3), 1995, pp.134-138
• 19. Elvik R., Vaa T., The Handbook of Road safety Measures. Elsevier Science, Oxford 2004
• 20. White Paper. European transport Policy for 2010: time to decise, Brussels, 12 IX 2001
• 21. Wilde G. J. S., A Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health. Risk Analysis 2 (1982), p. 209 - 225; see: Evans L., Risk Homeostasis Theory and Traffic Accident Data. Risk Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1986, pp. 81 - 94; Wilde G. J. S., Notes on the Interpretation of Traffic Accident Data and of Risk Homeostasis Theory: Reply to L. Evans