Evaluation of a small inland ferry’s energy requirements from the acceleration stage of towing tank model tests

• Autorzy: Kunicka, Magdalena , Wrzask, Klaudia , Litwin, Wojciech , Grygorowicz, Mirosław , Zeratgaar, Hamid
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Computing the power required to meet a ship’s operational needs is one of the most important tasks in naval design. The power required to propel a vessel is directly related to the resistance the hull experiences as it moves through the water. The conventional method of determining a ship’s resistance involves towing tank tests of ship models at a fixed speed; however, for short-range vessels, where constant speed is not the primary mode of operation, a dynamic model is needed. This paper demonstrates a way in which different operational motion profile models can be retrieved from the acceleration stage of towing tank tests. We show that the data from the acceleration stage, often overlooked in towing tank tests, allow us to derive the gliding equations of motion. A dynamic model of a small inland ferry on the Motława River in the city of Gdańsk is developed, which enables optimisation of the required power based on different operation profiles.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

inland ferry; green shipping; hybrid; power requirement; acceleration stage towing tests; added mass

• Czasopismo: Polish Maritime Research
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: nr 3
• Strony: 34--41
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kunicka, Magdalena

• Poland,

autor

Wrzask, Klaudia

• Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland, Poland

autor

Litwin, Wojciech

• Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland, Poland

autor

Grygorowicz, Mirosław

• Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland, Poland

autor

Zeratgaar, Hamid

• Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

Bibliografia

• 1. Skjong E, Volden R, Rodskar E, Molinas M, Johansen T A, Cunningham J. Past, present, and future challenges of the marine vessel’s electrical power system. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 2016, 2(4), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2016.2552720.
• 2. Geertsma R D, Negenborn R R, Visser K, Hopman J J. Design and control of hybrid power and propulsion systems for smart ships: A review of developments. Applied Energy 2017, 194, 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.060.
• 3. Planakis N, Papalambrou G, Kyrtatos N. Predictive power–split system of hybrid ship propulsion for Energy management and emissions reduction. Control Engineering Practice 2021, 111, 104795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104795.
• 4. Lee T, Nam H. A study on green shipping in major countries: In the view of shipyards, shipping companies, ports, and policies. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 2017, 33(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.009.
• 5. Kalikatzarakis M, Geertsma R D, Boonen E J, Visser K, Negenborn R R. Ship energy management for hybrid propulsion and power supply with shore charging. Control Engineering Practice 2018, 76, 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.04.009.
• 6. Leśniewski W, Piatek D, Marszałkowski K, Litwin W. Small vessel with inboard engine retrofitting concepts; Real boat tests, laboratory hybrid drive tests and theoretical studies. Energies 2020, 13(10), 2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102586.
• 7. Kunicka M, Litwin W. Energy demand of short-range inland ferry with series hybrid propulsion depending on the navigation strategy. Energies 2019, 12(18), 3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183499.
• 8. Kunicka M, Litwin W. Energy efficient small inlandpassenger shuttle ferry with hybrid propulsion—Concept design, calculations and model tests. Polish Maritime Research 2019, 26(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0028.
• 9. Ahmad S M, Sutton R. Dynamic modelling of a remotely operated vehicle. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 2003, 36(4), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474–6670(17)36655–7.
• 10. Hammoud A, Sahili J, Madi M, Maalouf E. Design and dynamic modeling of ROVs: Estimating the damping and added mass parameters. Ocean Engineering 2021, 239, 109818. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:244198376.
• 11. Wrzask K. Vessel energy requirement prediction from acceleration stage towing tests on scale models. Polish Maritime Research 2023, 30(2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr–2023–0017.
• 12. Motora S. On the measurement of added mass and added moment of inertia of ships in steering motion. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Ship Maneuverability, David Taylor Model Basin Report, 1960, 1461, pp. 241–274.
• 13. Ghassemi H, Yari E. The added mass coefficient computation of sphere, ellipsoid and marine propellers using boundary element method. Polish Maritime Research 2011, 18(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-011-0003-1.
• 14. Bidikli B, Tatlicioglu E, Zergeroglu E. Compensating of added mass terms in dynamically positioned Surface vehicles: A continuous robust control approach. Ocean Engineering 2017, 139, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.05.002.
• 15. Zeraatgar H, Moghaddas A, Sadati K. Analysis of surge added mass of planing hulls by model experiment. Ships and Offshore Structures 2020, 15(3), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1615705.
• 16. Froude W. Experiments on the surface-friction experienced by a plane moving through water. British Association for the Advancement of Science 1872, 42, 118–124.
• 17. Froude W. On experiments with HMS Greyhound. Trans. INA 1874, 15.
• 18. Froude W. Experiments upon the effect produced on the wave-making resistance of ships by length of paralel middle body. Institution of Naval Architects 1877.
• 19. Hughes G. Friction and form resistance in turbulent flow and a proposed formulation for use in model and ship correlation. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 1954, 96, 314–376.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pomr-2024-0034