The application of ICPA optimization algorithm in multi-objective optimization structural design of prefabricated buildings

• Autorzy: Li, Chao
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

With the prefabricated buildings developing, traditional architectural design methods can no longer meet the requirements of efficient, green, and sustainable development. In view of this, based on the analysis of the framework structure of the cyclical parthenogenesis algorithm, the study introduced chaotic optimization algorithm for improvement. And the improved new algorithm was applied to multi-objective problems in the optimization design of prefabricated building structures. Finally, a novel structural design optimization model was proposed. These experiments confirmed that the improved algorithm had the least 160 iterations and 17 optimal solutions, which was an increase of 15 compared to traditional aphid algorithms. Two function solutions of this new structural design optimization model were both between -0:5 and 0.5, with relatively smaller values. In addition, this model could effectively optimize and transform physical buildings, increasing their structural stability by 2.43%, increasing their structural quality coefficient by 4.49%, reducing vibration cycles by 0.06%, and reducing inter story displacement angles by 0.04%. In summary, the improved cyclical parthenogenesis algorithm has good performance in solving multi-objective problems in prefabricated structures, and can quickly and accurately find the global optimal solution. This study aims to provide guidance for the prefabricated building structure design.

• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 70, nr 4
• Strony: 57--70
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Li, Chao

• School of Modern Technology, Mianyang City College, Mianyang, China,

Bibliografia

• [1] B. Du, G. Li, Y. Wu, et al., “Efficient storey lateral stiffness estimate and gradient-based multi-objective optimization of reinforced concrete frames with hybrid semi-rigid precast connections”, Engineering Optimization, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1964-1979, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2020.1839444.
• [2] H. Sun, M. Tang, W. Peng, and R. Wang, “Interval prediction of short-term building electrical load via a novel multi-objective optimized distributed fuzzy model”, Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 33, no. 22, pp. 15357-15371, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-06162-9.
• [3] B. Abdollahzadeh and F.S. Gharehchopogh, “A multi-objective optimization algorithm for feature selection problems”, Engineering with Computers, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1845-1863, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00366-021-01369-9.
• [4] S. Sharma and V. Kumar, “A comprehensive review on multi-objective optimization techniques: Past, present and future”, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 5605-5633, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09778-9.
• [5] J. Peng, Y. Feng, Q. Zhang, and X. Liu, “Multi-objective integrated optimization study of prefabricated building projects introducing sustainable levels”, Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, art. no. 2821, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29881-6.
• [6] G. Yao, R. Li, and Y. Yang, “An Improved multi-objective optimization and decision-making method on construction sites layout of prefabricated buildings”, Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7, art. no. 6279, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15076279.
• [7] M. Hui, W. Zhang, and D. Meihong, “Spatial conflict analysis and multi-objective optimization for prefabricated building hoisting construction”, China Safety Science Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 28-29, 2020, doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.005.
• [8] C.Y. Ma and J. van Ameijde, “Adaptable modular construction systems and multi-objective optimisation strategies for mass-customised housing: A new user-driven paradigm for high-rise living in Hong Kong”, International Journal of Architectural Computing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 96-113, 2022.
• [9] A. Kaveh, K.B. Hamedani, and T. Bakhshpoori, “Optimal design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls utilizing eleven meta-heuristic algorithms: a comparative study”, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 156-168, 2020, doi: 10.3311/PPci.15217.
• [10] A. Kaveh and M.R. Seddighian, “Domain decomposition of finite element models utilizing eight meta-heuristic algorithms: a comparative study”, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 2616-2634, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15397734.2020.1781655.
• [11] R. Sun, E. Zhang, D. Mu, S. Ji, Z. Zhang, H. Liu, and Z. Fu, “Optimization of the 3D point cloud registration algorithm based on FPFH features”, Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 5, art. no. 3096, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13053096.
• [12] X. Shen, S. Aliko, Y. Han, J. Skipper, and C. Peng, “Finding core-periphery structures with node influences”, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 875-887, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2021.3138436.
• [13] B. Nan, Y. Bai, and Y. Wu, “Multi-objective optimization of spatially truss structures based on node movement”, Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 6, art. no. 1964, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10061964.
• [14] C.A. Nallolla, P. Vijayapriya, D. Chittathuru, and S. Padmanaban, “Multi-objective optimization algorithms for a hybrid AC/DC microgrid using RES: a comprehensive review”, Electronics, vol. 12, no. 4, art. no. 1062, 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12041062.
• [15] S. Choudhuri, S. Adeniye, and A. Sen, “Distribution alignment using complementive entropy objective and adaptive consensus-based label refinement for partial domain adaptation”, Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43-51, 2023, doi: 10.47852/bonviewAIA2202524.
• [16] M. Lendo-Siwicka, R. Trach, K. Pawluk, G. Wrzesiński, and A. Żochowska, “Assessment of the technical condition of heritage buildings with the use of fuzzy logic”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 123-140, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ace.2023.145257.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ace.2024.151879