Symbiotic design and numerical methods of industrial architecture and urban landscape in the context of sustainable development

• Autorzy: Zu, Beibei , Cao, Wen , Fan, Haixia
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The status quo of low sustainability of urban landscape symbiosis design programme and low referability of the corresponding comprehensive evaluation method, the study will take the environmental and ecological value as the symbiosis goal to design the urban landscape. The study constructs a comprehensive evaluation model of industrial heritage urban landscape ecology, researches each index affecting landscape ecology, and determines the weight of each influence index by combining qualitative and quantitative methods. The maximum influence factors of the four criteria layers of emotion, culture, material and ecology are pleasure, obvious cultural symbols, appropriate scale and microclimate regulation, and the corresponding values are 0.313, 0.404, 0.315 and 0.495, respectively. Compared with that before the introduction of the self-organised neural network fusion K-Means clustering algorithm, the ecological evaluation scores of the urban landscape of the industrial heritage are much closer to the real situation, and the overall error is much higher. The ecological evaluation model of industrial heritage buildings is closer to the real situation, and the overall error fluctuation is 0.012-0.020. The precision-recall curve of the comprehensive evaluation model of industrial heritage buildings is more advantageous than that of other comprehensive evaluation models. The results of the study provide a scientific reference basis for the design of the external landscape environment of industrial heritage buildings, and provide a strong scientific support for the ecological symbiosis between old industrial buildings and the environment under the concept of sustainability.

• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 70, nr 4
• Strony: 11--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zu, Beibei

• Xuchang Vocational Technical College, Xuchang, China,

autor

Cao, Wen

• Xuchang Vocational Technical College, Xuchang, China,

autor

Fan, Haixia

• Xuchang Vocational Technical College, Xuchang, China,

Bibliografia

• [1] A. Gravagnuolo, M. Angrisano, and L. F. Girard, “Circular economy strategies in eight historic port cities: Criteria and indicators towards a circular city assessment framework”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 13, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11133512.
• [2] X. Yang, P. Grussenmeyer, M. Koehl, H. Macher, A. Murtiyoso, and T. Landes, “Review of built heritage modelling: integration of HBIM and other information techniques”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 46, pp. 350-360, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2020.05.008.
• [3] F. Banfi, R. Brumana, and C. Stanga, “Extended reality and informative models for the architectural heritage: From scan-to-BIM process to virtual and augmented reality”, Virtual Archaeology Review, vol. 10, no. 21, pp. 14-30, 2019, doi: 10.4995/VAR.2019.11923.
• [4] G. De Luca, A. S. Dastgerdi, C. Francini, and G. Liberatore, "Sustainable cultural heritage planning and management of vertourism in art cities: Lessons from atlas world heritage”, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12093929.
• [5] H. Wang, Y. Pan, and X. Luo, “Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: A review and bibliometric analysis”, Automation in Construction, vol. 103, pp. 41-52, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.005.
• [6] M. Goncikowski, “Research by design: architectural and structural solutions allowing the integration of the skyscraper complex with the urban space in Warsaw”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 21-36, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ace.2023.147645.
• [7] A. Tofiluk, “Problems and challenges of the built environment and the potential of prefabricated architecture”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 405-424, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ace.2023.146088.
• [8] M. Bottero, C. D’Alpaos, and A. Oppio, “Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11030785.
• [9] S. Schindler and J. M. Kanai, “Getting the territory right: infrastructure-led development and the reemergence of spatial planning strategies”, Regional Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 40-51, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984.
• [10] M. Sun and C. Chen, “Renovation of industrial heritage sites and sustainable urban regeneration in post-industrial Shanghai”, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 729-752, 2023, doi: 10.1080/07352166.2021.1881404.
• [11] O. I. Psomadaki, C. A. Dimoulas, G. M. Kalliris, and G. Paschalidis, "Digital storytelling and audience engagement in cultural heritage management: A collaborative model based on the Digital City of Thessaloniki”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 36, pp. 12-22, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2018.07.016.
• [12] G. Bertino, J. Kisser, J. Zeilinger, G. Langergraber, T. Fischer, and D. Österreicher, “Fundamentals of building deconstruction as a circular economy strategy for the reuse of construction materials”, Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 939-969, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11030939.
• [13] D. S. I. Elsayed, “Reaccessing marginalised heritage sites in historic Cairo: a cross-case comparison”, Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 375-397, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JCHMSD-01-2019-0005.
• [14] S. Çetin, C. De.Wolf, and N. Bocken, “Circular digital built environment: an emerging framework”, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13116348.
• [15] D. Barillari and C. A. Stival, “The industrial heritage of the Trieste Shipyard in Monfalcone. Restoring the garden-city model in the residential typologies of the Panzano District”, Journal of Architectural Conservation, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 217-242, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13556207.2022.2057092.
• [16] X. Ollier, “Colour coordination project for the historic shipyard site of La Ciotat: A geopoetic approach to urban colour design”, Color Research Application, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 433-444, 2023, doi: 10.1002/col.22884.
• [17] F. Vidal, R. Vicente, and J. M. Silva, “Review of environmental and air pollution impacts on built heritage: 10 questions on corrosion and soiling effects for urban intervention”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 37, pp. 273-295, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2018.11.006.
• [18] A. Lak, M. Gheitasi, and D. J. Timothy, “Urban regeneration through heritage tourism: Cultural policies and strategic management”, Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 386-403, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14766825.2019.1668002.
• [19] K. Liu, Y. Sun, and D. Yang, “The administrative center or economic center: Which dominates the regional green development pattern? A case study of Shandong peninsula urban agglomeration, China", Green and Low-Carbon Economy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 110-120, 2023, doi: 10.47852/bonviewGLCE3202955.
• [20] G. Rocha, L. Mateus, J. Fernández, and V. Ferreira, “A scan-to-BIM methodology applied to heritage buildings”, Heritage, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47-65, 2020, doi: 10.3390/heritage3010004.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ace.2024.151876